throbber
Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2205-3, PageID.39911 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2205-3, PageID.39912 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`Open-End vs. Closed-End Leasing
`January 2016
`by Paul Clinton
`
`The fleet leasing industry is taking a cautiously
`optimistic approach to coming changes in accounting
`standards that have reignited discussions about the
`leasing instruments that have become essential tools
`for procurement of fleet vehicles.
`
`The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB)
`new lease accounting may not have a seismic impact
`on fleet management when they arrive in early 2016,
`but fleet managers will need to assess the impact
`of including lease obligations on corporate balance
`sheets and should initiate thoughtful, preemptive
`conversations with their finance departments.
`
`In the commercial fleet industry, leasing has become
`the dominant way companies acquire their vehicles,
`a trend that stands in stark relief to the public fleet
`realm, where fleet managers often deploy replacement
`reserve funds to fund fleet purchases.
`
`Companies choose to lease their vehicles as a way
`to reduce the amount of capital tied up in non-core
`assets, as well as to reduce sales tax by paying tax on
`a leased vehicle similar to rental instead of paying tax
`on the vehicle purchase amount.
`
`AS FEATURED ON
`www.fleetfinancials.com
`
`Fleets that opt for leasing over financing or outright
`cash purchases still mostly prefer an open-ended
`TRAC lease, which can also be known as an operating
`lease. TRAC, which stands for Terminal Rental
`Adjustment Clause, is a certification that tells the
`Internal Revenue Service that the lease conforms
`to its tax codes and isn’t considered a daily rental
`agreement. Open-ended leases typically offer a fleet
`manager more flexibility in dealing with variable
`mileage and greater input into remarketing decisions.
`
`“We have found that the TRAC lease meets the
`objectives of the widest audience,” said Bruce Wright,
`strategic consulting manager with Element Fleet
`Management. “The TRAC lease traditionally offers the
`lowest total cost of ownership over the long run of the
`portfolio due to the customer experiencing the actual
`depreciation based on their asset utilization patterns.”
`
`Other fleets prefer closed-end operating leases that
`provide greater cost certainty for tighter monthly
`budgets, smaller fleets, or executive fleets that tie
`vehicles to compensation.
`
`“Companies turn to closed-end leases when they’re
`looking to get a fixed-cost solution for the provision
`of vehicles rather than taking the risk themselves
`and waiting until the vehicle is disposed to know
`what their ultimate cost was,” said Joe Pelehach, vice
`president of Motorlease Corp.
`
`A third lease type, known as an open calculation lease,
`has arrived from Europe. The lease isn’t widely offered
`by U.S. fleet management companies, and it offers a
`middle ground on costs and remarketing decisions.
`It functions like a closed-end lease with greater
`transparency.
`
`Commercial leasing has evolved from the early days of
`closed-end offerings, where fleet managers now face
`two main choices, including open-ended and closed-
`ended leases that offer basic benefits. An open-ended
`lease is set up as a “cost plus” arrangement, while the
`closed-end lease offers a fixed price.
`
`
`Choosing a lease should always be undertaken with a
`clear idea of how the vehicle will be used in the field.
`Other factors that must be considered include the
`company’s financial needs, operational requirements,
`asset type and utilization. Executives with fleet
`management companies suggested that fleet
`managers should calculate the total cost of ownership
`of a vehicle before choosing a leasing instrument.
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2205-3, PageID.39913 Filed 04/25/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`Let’s take a closer look at leasing options available to
`commercial fleets. Read our sidebar about the benefits
`of using capital to purchase fleet vehicles outright.
`Financing fleet vehicles is yet another option that may
`lose steam as interest rates rise higher.
`
`In the present leasing environment, a capital lease
`would be added to a company’s balance sheet while
`an operating lease could be kept off the balance
`sheet, a situation that will likely change under the new
`accounting standards.
`
`Open-Ended Leasing: Flexibility and Control
`Open-end leases have become pervasive in fleet leasing
`because they offer fleet managers greater control of
`asset utilization and disposal. In an open-end lease,
`the lessee agrees to a minimum term that’s usually at
`least 12 months and can terminate the agreement at
`any point after the end of the term. The lessor then
`sells the vehicle. If the proceeds of the sale are greater
`than what was calculated in the agreement, the lessee
`receives a reimbursement. If the vehicle is sold for less,
`the lessee must reimburse the lessor for the difference.
`
`Open-end leases appeal to fleet managers with
`remarketing expertise who monitor the used-vehicle
`market and can sell vehicles during peaks in the value
`cycle.
`
`Michael Bieger, senior director of global procurement
`for payroll servicer ADP, uses open-end leases for
`his fleet of mostly Ford Fusion Hybrid sedans for this
`reason. Bieger usually leases his 1,200 vehicles for
`about 36 months.
`
`Open-end leases carry no mileage restrictions and
`as a result appeal to companies with unpredictable
`mileage. High-mileage vehicles will depreciate faster,
`which will force the lessee to bear the brunt of higher
`use in the used-vehicle market. The lessee also assumes
`responsibility for remarketing decisions, including the
`risk or reward involving resale value.
`
`“In North America, most fleets exist to serve as work
`and business tools and are not provided in lieu of
`compensation,” said Norman Din, vice president of
`strategic sales with Wheels, Inc. “Because they are work
`tools, mileage is typically both high and varied.”
`
`Fleet management companies usually offer different
`kinds of open-end leases depending on the accounting
`guidance from the corporation’s finance department.
`A lease would be considered a capital lease versus an
`operating lease if one of four factors is met, said Bryan
`Wilson, ARI’s controller.
`
`“The difference between a capital and operating lease
`comes down to the accounting guidance that governs
`leases,” Wilson said. “If at least one of the four criteria is
`true then the lease would be classified as a capital lease
`on the lessee’s account books.”
`
`A lease would be considered a capital lease if the
`ownership of the asset is shifted to the lessee, the
`lessee purchases the asset at below market price by
`exercising a “bargain purchase option,” the lease term
`encompasses at least 75% of the useful life of the asset,
`or the present value of the minimum lease payments
`plus any lessee guarantee is at least 90 percent of the
`fair value of the asset at lease inception.
`
`“The reason we don’t have hard and fast end points
`is because we need flexibility to respond to market
`conditions,” Bieger said. “We can cycle the vehicles out
`early should it be a good business decision for ADP.
`If you have a closed-end lease that opportunity is not
`provided to you.”
`
`Fleet management companies specializing in open-end
`leases include ARI, Donlen, Element, EMKAY, LeasePlan,
`and Wheels, Inc.
`
`Closed-Ended Leasing: Predictable Outcomes
`Closed-end leases can resemble retail leases and appeal
`to fleets seeking a fixed monthly payment. With this
`lease, the term is set and monthly payments are based
`on the estimated residual value of the vehicle at the end
`of the term. The leasing company estimates this value,
`and sets restrictions on mileage and wear. The lessee
`can walk away from the deal at the end of the term
`with no additional costs if the vehicle didn’t exceed the
`maximum mileage or wear-and-tear parameters. The
`lessor sells the vehicle and assumes responsibility for
`any profits or losses caused by fluctuations in market
`value.
`
`“Closed-end leases have the benefit of a predictable
`monthly payment with no residual risk to the lessee
`at term end,” said Craig Lehmann, Donlen’s director
`of equipment leasing operations. “With the lessor
`assuming the residual risk, the potential drawback
`is there are usage provisions incorporated into the
`lease, which could lead to end-of-term charges for
`customers that did not accurately project usage at
`lease inception.”
`
`Closed-end leases can carry penalties for mileage
`overages or increased wear and tear, but the fleet
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2205-3, PageID.39914 Filed 04/25/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`management companies offering these products say
`they make adjustments to gain customer loyalty.
`
`Closed-end leases can also find favor with multi-
`national fleets that manage vehicles in various countries
`to harmonize their lease accounting across the board.
`
`“The mere prospect of having an excess mileage charge
`or early termination fee causes some fleets to remove
`closed-end leases from consideration,” said Pelehach.
`“The reality is that whether a lessee is in a closed-end
`lease or an open-end lease, they are going to have
`to deal with the economic realities of the use of that
`vehicle, whether it is terminating a lease earlier than
`anticipated or driving higher miles.”
`
`As one way to ease the impact of unpredictable
`mileage, Merchants Fleet Management allows larger
`fleets to pool mileage to help even out driving patterns.
`
`“The economics of a closed-end lease payment usually
`make sense when driver mileage is predictable,” said
`Tom Coffey, vice president of sales and marketing for
`Merchants.
`
`Similarly, Motorlease offers a mile-per-mile credit that
`allows a fleet to apply the unused miles from one
`vehicle to the mileage overage of another vehicle.
`Mileage overages that result in penalties can be viewed
`as a way to account for unplanned depreciation,
`Pelehach added.
`
`“Assuming that the leasing company is fair in their
`excess mileage charge, the additional cost that is
`incurred by an excess mileage charge is nothing more
`than capturing the additional depreciation that occurs
`as a result of the higher mileage,” Pelehach added.
`
`Closed-end leases can also make more sense in an
`environment of rising interest rates, because the rate is
`fixed with other costs at the beginning of the term, said
`Pelehach. However, fleet management companies who
`offer open-end leases said rates can be fixed on those
`products as well.
`
`Closed-end leases provide more certainty to fleet
`managers who worry about the future of the used-car
`market, which has been strong in recent years. These
`leases fix the cost of depreciation, which typically
`makes up the highest cost in the TCO equation.
`
`“The used market is beginning to move off of those
`historic all-time highs, and looking at historical data can
`be dangerous if trying to calculate future expectations,”
`Pelehach said. “That’s a huge problem with open-end
`leases and TCO. You don’t know what your TCO is until
`the vehicle is sold.”
`
`“International accounting standards only recognize
`closed end leases as operating,” said Brad Vliek,
`EMKAY’s vice president of client services. “Because
`of this, U.S. syndicates with foreign parent companies
`typically choose closed-end leases for consistency with
`their parent company.”
`
`Lease accounting may drive a fleet’s decision to steer
`away from a closed-end lease because the right to use
`an asset would be required for the entire lease term.
`Open-end leases average about six months of “right to
`use” with a minimum term of 12 months, said Wheels’
`Din.
`
`Fleet management companies specializing in closed-
`end leases include LeasePlan, Merchants Fleet
`Management, and Motorlease.
`
`Open Calculation Leases: A Hybrid Offering
`LeasePlan has begun offering an open calculation
`lease that has been a popular offering in Europe
`because it functions similarly to a closed-end lease
`but with characteristics of an open-end. In Europe,
`fleets who opt for closed-end leases that don’t list the
`components that make up the monthly payment.
`
`The open calculation lease gives fleets the predictability
`of a set payment, but also offer more transparency
`about how the lessor arrived at that number. At the end
`of the term, the lease offers a risk-and-reward sharing
`scenario that usually involves the lessor paying the
`lessee half of the reward if the vehicle sells for more
`than the expected value. The lessor usually also agrees
`to shoulder the costs if the vehicle sells for less.
`
`This type of lease also suits the European leasing
`market because vehicles are often sold in lots at
`auction rather than being sold individually. The lot
`allows a lessor to mix vehicles in various conditions to
`spread out risk and level the average selling price.
`
`Closed-end lease terms tend to be longer and can
`range from 18 months to 36 months.
`
`LeasePlan is the only fleet management company
`offering an open calculation lease in the U.S.
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2205-3, PageID.39915 Filed 04/25/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`Purchasing Fleet Vehicles with Capital Outlays
`Fleets often choose leasing over purchasing to avoid
`capital expenditures that may be better suited for other
`corporate goals. Companies willing to move forward
`with this outlay can reduce operating costs associated
`with hiring leasing service providers.
`
`Sue Miller, the former fleet manager for McDonald’s
`Corp., shifted the company from a self-funded leasing
`approach to a capital outlay approach in her 29 years
`with the company.
`
`“When we analyzed the lease-versus-own approach,
`we realized we were adding a layer of expense and
`administration that wasn’t necessary by financing our
`own leasing of the vehicles,” said Miller.
`
`Miller turned to fleet management service providers
`for other services and used what’s known as an
`“unbundled” approach. She purchased the vehicles
`through dealers and hired a remarketing company to
`help with disposal. She also implemented a vehicle
`trade-in program that saved the company up to
`$400,000 a year, depending on the quality of the new
`vehicle.
`
`“The unbundled approach became our mode of
`business,” Miller said. “We just wrote a check for the
`cars, and added them to our ledger. During my tenure,
`we were a cash-oriented company. Paying for the car
`outright was still a benefit. With the weighted cost
`of capital, we were still coming out ahead by owning
`the car with no monthly billing reconciliations or
`adjustments that come with leasing. We set up straight
`depreciation for the car and managed it very cleanly in
`that regard. We had no early termination penalties and
`weren’t constrained about how the vehicle was utilized
`or taking a vehicle in or out of service. We were in full
`control of the asset.”
`
`SOURCE: http://www.fleetfinancials.com/channel/leasing/article/story/2016/01/open-end-versus-closed-end-leasing.aspx
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket