`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40004 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`__________________________________________________________________
`IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
`No. 12-md-02311
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`Hon. Sean F. Cox
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`IN RE : WIRE HARNESS
`IN RE : INSTRUMENT PANEL CLUSTERS
`IN RE : FUEL SENDERS
`IN RE : HEATER CONTROL PANELS
`IN RE : BEARINGS
`IN RE : OCCUPANT SAFETY SYSTEMS
`IN RE : ALTERNATORS
`IN RE : ANTI-VIBRATIONAL RUBBER PARTS
`IN RE : WINDSHIELD WIPERS
`IN RE : RADIATORS
`
`IN RE : STARTERS
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE LAMPS
`IN RE : SWITCHES
`
`IN RE : IGNITION COILS
`IN RE : MOTOR GENERATOR
`IN RE : STEERING ANGLE SENSORS
`IN RE : HID BALLASTS
`IN RE : INVERTERS
`
`IN RE : ELECTRONIC POWERED
`STEERING ASSEMBLIES
`IN RE : AIR FLOW METERS
`IN RE : FAN MOTORS
`IN RE : FUEL INJECTION SYSTEMS
`IN RE : POWER WINDOW MOTORS
`IN RE : AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
`FLUID WARMERS
`
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00103
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00203
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00303
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00403
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00503
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00603
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00703
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00803
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00903
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01003
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01103
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01203
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01303
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01403
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01503
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01603
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01703
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01803
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01903
`
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02003
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02103
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02203
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02303
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02403
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40005 Filed 05/09/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`IN RE : VALVE TIMING CONTROL DEVICES CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02503
`IN RE : ELECTRONIC THROTTLE BODIES
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02603
`IN RE : AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
`
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02703
`IN RE : WINDSHIELD WASHER
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02803
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE CONSTANT
`
` CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02903
`VELOCITY JOINT BOOT PRODUCTS
` CASE NO. 2:15-CV-03003
`
`IN RE : SPARK PLUGS
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:15-CV-03203
`
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE HOSES
`
` CASE NO. 2:15-CV-03303
`
`IN RE : SHOCK ABSORBERS
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03403
`
`IN RE : BODY SEALING PRODUCTS
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03503
`
`IN RE : INTERIOR TRIM PRODUCTS
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03603
`
`IN RE : BRAKE HOSES
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03703
`
`IN RE : EXHAUST SYSTEMS
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03803
`
`IN RE : CERAMIC SUBSTRATES
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03903
`
`IN RE : POWER WINDOW SWITCHES
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-04003
`
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE STEEL TUBE
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-04103
`IN RE : ACCESS MECHANISMS ACTIONS
` CASE NO. 2:17-CV-04303
`IN RE : DOOR LATCHES
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`End-Payor Actions
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF EMMA K. BURTON IN SUPPORT OF ENTERPRISE
`FLEET MANAGEMENT, INC’S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
`OF MOTION TO ENFORCE END-PAYOR SETTLEMENTS AND
`STRIKE CONTRADICTORY AND IMPROPER STIPULATION
`
`I, Emma K. Burton, declare as follows.
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner at the law firm of Crowell & Moring LLP and represent
`
`Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (“EFM”) in its claim to the End Payor settlements
`
`in the class action litigation known as In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, MDL
`
`No. 2311 (E.D. Mich.) (“Auto Parts Matter”). Through my representation of EFM, I
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40006 Filed 05/09/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`have personal knowledge of information relating to the company’s claim in this
`
`matter. All of the statements in this declaration are based upon that information and,
`
`if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I submit this declaration in support of EFM’s Reply to End-Payor
`
`Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.’s Motion to Enforce the
`
`End-Payor Settlements and Strike Stipulation reached with Class Action Capital, Inc.
`
`(“CAC”) and certain other fleet management companies (“FMCs”).
`
`3.
`
`End-Payor Plaintiffs (“EPPs”) incorrectly maintain that FMCs like EFM
`
`“could recover for claims in the Auto Dealer cases,” referring to the Automobile
`
`Dealership settlements. PageID.39880.
`
`4.
`
`The Automobile Dealer settlements define Dealer class members as “a
`
`franchised entity or person authorized to engage in the business of selling and/or
`
`leasing Vehicles at retail in the United States.” See, e.g., Panasonic Corporation
`
`Settlement Agreement, 13-cv-02702 PageID.4494. “Authorization” in this context is
`
`by an automobile manufacturer, or OEM. Valid claimants to the Dealer settlements
`
`must show both a Dealership State License/Registration Number, as well as a Dealer
`
`ID Number issued by an OEM. See Auto Dealer Settlement Proof of Claim form
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
`
`5.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is correspondence to my Crowell & Moring
`
`colleague Deborah Arbabi dated March 28, 2017, from the Auto Dealer Settlement
`
`Claim Administrator providing that “In order to be eligible to participate in the
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40007 Filed 05/09/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`Settlements that are the subject of this administration, a Claimant must, among other
`
`things, be an Automobile Dealership which purchases New Vehicles and/or Parts for
`
`resale.” (emphasis added). This correspondence further provides:
`
`Our research indicates that Enterprise Holdings, Inc. offers a portfolio of
`services, including car rental, car sharing vanpooling, used car sales, truck
`rental, online ride matching, and affiliated fleet management. As such,
`Enterprise Holdings, Inc. does not meet the definition of an Automobile
`Dealership and is, therefore, not included in the Class. (emphasis added).
`
`6.
`
`Accordingly, neither Enterprise Holdings, Inc., nor EFM, have claims
`
`pending to the Auto Dealer settlements, nor has either entity recovered any funds
`
`from the Auto Dealer settlements.
`
`7.
`
`The average duration of EFM’s standard TRAC lease is at least thirty-six
`
`(36) months.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this 9th day of May, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Emma K. Burton
`
`
`Emma K. Burton
`Crowell & Moring LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`