throbber
Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40003 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40004 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`__________________________________________________________________
`IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
`No. 12-md-02311
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`Hon. Sean F. Cox
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`IN RE : WIRE HARNESS
`IN RE : INSTRUMENT PANEL CLUSTERS
`IN RE : FUEL SENDERS
`IN RE : HEATER CONTROL PANELS
`IN RE : BEARINGS
`IN RE : OCCUPANT SAFETY SYSTEMS
`IN RE : ALTERNATORS
`IN RE : ANTI-VIBRATIONAL RUBBER PARTS
`IN RE : WINDSHIELD WIPERS
`IN RE : RADIATORS
`
`IN RE : STARTERS
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE LAMPS
`IN RE : SWITCHES
`
`IN RE : IGNITION COILS
`IN RE : MOTOR GENERATOR
`IN RE : STEERING ANGLE SENSORS
`IN RE : HID BALLASTS
`IN RE : INVERTERS
`
`IN RE : ELECTRONIC POWERED
`STEERING ASSEMBLIES
`IN RE : AIR FLOW METERS
`IN RE : FAN MOTORS
`IN RE : FUEL INJECTION SYSTEMS
`IN RE : POWER WINDOW MOTORS
`IN RE : AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
`FLUID WARMERS
`
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00103
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00203
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00303
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00403
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00503
` CASE NO. 2:12-CV-00603
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00703
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00803
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00903
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01003
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01103
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01203
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01303
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01403
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01503
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01603
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01703
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01803
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01903
`
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02003
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02103
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02203
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02303
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02403
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40005 Filed 05/09/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`IN RE : VALVE TIMING CONTROL DEVICES CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02503
`IN RE : ELECTRONIC THROTTLE BODIES
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02603
`IN RE : AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
`
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02703
`IN RE : WINDSHIELD WASHER
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:13-CV-02803
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE CONSTANT
`
` CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02903
`VELOCITY JOINT BOOT PRODUCTS
` CASE NO. 2:15-CV-03003
`
`IN RE : SPARK PLUGS
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:15-CV-03203
`
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE HOSES
`
` CASE NO. 2:15-CV-03303
`
`IN RE : SHOCK ABSORBERS
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03403
`
`IN RE : BODY SEALING PRODUCTS
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03503
`
`IN RE : INTERIOR TRIM PRODUCTS
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03603
`
`IN RE : BRAKE HOSES
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03703
`
`IN RE : EXHAUST SYSTEMS
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03803
`
`IN RE : CERAMIC SUBSTRATES
`
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-03903
`
`IN RE : POWER WINDOW SWITCHES
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-04003
`
`IN RE : AUTOMOTIVE STEEL TUBE
` CASE NO. 2:16-CV-04103
`IN RE : ACCESS MECHANISMS ACTIONS
` CASE NO. 2:17-CV-04303
`IN RE : DOOR LATCHES
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`End-Payor Actions
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF EMMA K. BURTON IN SUPPORT OF ENTERPRISE
`FLEET MANAGEMENT, INC’S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
`OF MOTION TO ENFORCE END-PAYOR SETTLEMENTS AND
`STRIKE CONTRADICTORY AND IMPROPER STIPULATION
`
`I, Emma K. Burton, declare as follows.
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner at the law firm of Crowell & Moring LLP and represent
`
`Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (“EFM”) in its claim to the End Payor settlements
`
`in the class action litigation known as In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, MDL
`
`No. 2311 (E.D. Mich.) (“Auto Parts Matter”). Through my representation of EFM, I
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40006 Filed 05/09/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`have personal knowledge of information relating to the company’s claim in this
`
`matter. All of the statements in this declaration are based upon that information and,
`
`if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I submit this declaration in support of EFM’s Reply to End-Payor
`
`Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.’s Motion to Enforce the
`
`End-Payor Settlements and Strike Stipulation reached with Class Action Capital, Inc.
`
`(“CAC”) and certain other fleet management companies (“FMCs”).
`
`3.
`
`End-Payor Plaintiffs (“EPPs”) incorrectly maintain that FMCs like EFM
`
`“could recover for claims in the Auto Dealer cases,” referring to the Automobile
`
`Dealership settlements. PageID.39880.
`
`4.
`
`The Automobile Dealer settlements define Dealer class members as “a
`
`franchised entity or person authorized to engage in the business of selling and/or
`
`leasing Vehicles at retail in the United States.” See, e.g., Panasonic Corporation
`
`Settlement Agreement, 13-cv-02702 PageID.4494. “Authorization” in this context is
`
`by an automobile manufacturer, or OEM. Valid claimants to the Dealer settlements
`
`must show both a Dealership State License/Registration Number, as well as a Dealer
`
`ID Number issued by an OEM. See Auto Dealer Settlement Proof of Claim form
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
`
`5.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is correspondence to my Crowell & Moring
`
`colleague Deborah Arbabi dated March 28, 2017, from the Auto Dealer Settlement
`
`Claim Administrator providing that “In order to be eligible to participate in the
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2207-2, PageID.40007 Filed 05/09/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`Settlements that are the subject of this administration, a Claimant must, among other
`
`things, be an Automobile Dealership which purchases New Vehicles and/or Parts for
`
`resale.” (emphasis added). This correspondence further provides:
`
`Our research indicates that Enterprise Holdings, Inc. offers a portfolio of
`services, including car rental, car sharing vanpooling, used car sales, truck
`rental, online ride matching, and affiliated fleet management. As such,
`Enterprise Holdings, Inc. does not meet the definition of an Automobile
`Dealership and is, therefore, not included in the Class. (emphasis added).
`
`6.
`
`Accordingly, neither Enterprise Holdings, Inc., nor EFM, have claims
`
`pending to the Auto Dealer settlements, nor has either entity recovered any funds
`
`from the Auto Dealer settlements.
`
`7.
`
`The average duration of EFM’s standard TRAC lease is at least thirty-six
`
`(36) months.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this 9th day of May, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Emma K. Burton
`
`
`Emma K. Burton
`Crowell & Moring LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket