throbber
Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2123, PageID.38530 Filed 03/09/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
` Master File No. 12-md-02311
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`Hon. Sean F. Cox
`
`Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen
`
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`
`
`
`ALL END-PAYOR ACTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC’S
`EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF PAGES
`
`Financial Recovery Services, LLC (“FRS”), through its undersigned
`
`counsel, brings this ex parte motion pursuant to L.R. 7.1(d)(3) to request leave to
`
`file a reply brief of no more than 9 pages, excluding signatures, in support of its
`
`Motion to Compel Acceptance and Processing of Vehicle Data (“Motion”).
`
`In support of this motion, FRS states that this extension of the Local Rules’
`
`page limit is necessary for FRS to respond fully to the issues raised in the
`
`Response by counsel for End-Payor Plaintiffs (“Class Counsel”) to FRS’s Motion.
`
`Specifically, additional pages are necessary to: (i) address and refute misleading
`
`factual representations raised by Class Counsel; (ii) set forth an accurate factual
`
`history of the claims submission process, which has been mischaracterized by
`
`Class Counsel; and (iii) accurately summarize this Court’s prior orders, and the
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2123, PageID.38531 Filed 03/09/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`pertinent procedural and administrative posture of this action, to ensure that this
`
`Court has a full and fair picture of this case’s landscape.
`
`FRS believes that addressing these matters is necessary to facilitate a just
`
`decision on the Motion. As Class Counsel were permitted to file a Response to the
`
`Motion exceeding the page limits set forth in the Local Rules by this Court’s order
`
`dated March 4, 2021 [ECF 2121, PageID.38524], FRS requests the same
`
`accommodation be extended to it in replying to that Response.
`
`WHEREFORE, FRS respectfully requests that this Court grant it leave, on
`
`an ex parte basis, to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel Acceptance
`
`and Processing of Vehicle Data of no more than 9 pages, excluding signatures.
`
`Dated: March 9, 2021
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Laura S. Faussié
`Jonathan T. Walton, Jr. (P32969)
`Michael P. Donnelly (P45221)
`Laura S. Faussié (P48933)
`FRASER TREBILCOCK
` DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C.
`One Woodward Avenue, Suite 1550
`Detroit, MI 48226
`(313) 237-7300
`jwalton@fraserlawfirm.com
`mdonnelly@fraserlawfirm.com
`lfaussie@fraserlawfirm.com
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2123, PageID.38532 Filed 03/09/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Aaron M. Panner
`Matthew R. Huppert
`Daniel S. Severson
`KELLOGG, HANSEN, TODD,
` FIGEL & FREDERICK, P.L.L.C.
`1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 326-7900
`apanner@kellogghansen.com
`mhuppert@kellogghansen.com
`dseverson@kellogghansen.com
`
`Counsel for Financial Recovery
`Services, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2123, PageID.38533 Filed 03/09/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that, on March 9, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing
`
`document with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will send
`
`notification of such filing to counsel of record.
`
`
`
` /s/ Laura S. Faussié
` Laura S. Faussié
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket