throbber
Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-1, PageID.38550 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`ALL END-PAYOR ACTIONS
`
`Master File No. 12-md-02311
`Honorable Sean F. Cox
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF EMMA K. BURTON IN SUPPORT OF CLAIMANTS’
`REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ACCEPTANCE OF POST-DEADLINE
`CLAIM SUBMISSIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-1, PageID.38551 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`I, Emma K. Burton, declare as follows.
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at Crowell & Moring LLP and am counsel for the 25 class
`
`member claimants (“Claimants”) who move this Court to reject End Payor Plaintiffs’ (“EPPs”)
`
`position denying post-deadline amendments filed by class members to timely filed claim forms
`
`and to order such submissions processed by the claims administrator and accepted in the class
`
`action settlements known as In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2311 (E.D.
`
`Mich.). Through my representation of Claimants, I have information relating to their claims to
`
`the End-Payor Settlements, and all of the statements in this Declaration are, unless otherwise
`
`indicated, based upon my information and belief.
`
`2.
`
`During the relevant time period for the End-Payor Settlements, Claimants
`
`together purchased and leased over 70,000 new vehicles containing component parts
`
`manufactured and price fixed by Defendants, and incurred overcharges as a result of Defendants’
`
`illegal conduct.
`
`3.
`
`Upon learning of their eligibility to participate in the End-Payor Settlements and
`
`before the June 18, 2021, claim filing deadline, Claimants filed claim forms with the claims
`
`administrator.
`
`4.
`
`Claimants then worked diligently and expeditiously to collect complete vehicle
`
`information—including all VINs, identification of all makes, models, and model years, and all
`
`dates of purchase or lease—for more than 70,000 vehicles purchased or leased over the nearly
`
`30-year period relevant to the End-Payor Settlements.
`
`5.
`
`The majority of Claimants filed amendments with the claims administrator
`
`containing complete information for all claimed vehicles within 1-2 weeks of the June 18, 2020,
`
`claim filing deadline, and no more than 10 weeks for all Claimants as outlined below:
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-1, PageID.38552 Filed 03/10/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`Claimant ID
`
`10021066
`10016954
`10021511
`10021367
`10022382
`10022306
`1008522
`10025976
`10144572
`10145712
`10018601
`10020479
`10021397
`10144615
`10145653
`10150087
`10022845
`10022714
`10022611
`10022397
`10022648
`10021481
`10021053
`10172223
`10180444
`
`Amended
`Submission Date
`
`06/25/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`06/30/20
`07/01/20
`07/01/20
`07/01/20
`07/01/20
`07/01/20
`07/01/20
`07/13/20
`07/14/20
`07/14/20
`07/14/20
`07/17/20
`07/17/20
`08/07/20
`08/28/20
`08/28/20
`
`Weeks from
`June 18, 2020
`1
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<2
`<4
`<4
`<4
`<4
`<5
`<5
`<8
`10
`10
`
`In response to the amendments submitted by Claimants, the claims administrator
`
`
`
`6.
`
`confirmed receipt of 24 such submissions with boilerplate confirmation emails, and sent only 1
`
`response regarding timeliness, in which the claims administrator represented that it would
`
`“notify [Claimant] once it is clear as to the determination of untimely submissions and whether
`
`they will be allowed for consideration in the Settlements.” A copy of the June 26, 2020, email
`
`from Jeremy Bailey, Epiq Project Coordinator—redacted to remove claimant identification—is
`
`attached at Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-1, PageID.38553 Filed 03/10/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`7.
`
`To date, Claimants have not received any such notification from the claims
`
`administrator regarding the 25 amended submissions. Claimants first became aware of EPPs’
`
`intention to reject post-deadline submissions as untimely from review of EPPs’ correspondence
`
`to FRS appearing as exhibits to FRS’ Motion to Compel Acceptance and Processing of Vehicle
`
`Data, filed February 17, 2021.
`
`8.
`
`Upon learning of EPPs’ intention, Claimants reached out to class counsel Chanler
`
`Langham by email on February 24, 2021, to request a meet and confer regarding the 25 post-
`
`deadline submissions. A copy of my correspondence to Mr. Langham —redacted to remove
`
`claimant identification—is attached here at Exhibit B.
`
`9.
`
`EPPs responded with availability to meet and confer only after filing a Response
`
`to FRS’ Motion on March 3, 2021. On March 5, 2021, I met by phone with class counsel
`
`Chanler Langham, Jenna Farleigh, and William Reiss. During that call, class counsel indicated
`
`that EPPs are inclined to treat post-deadline submissions such as Claimants’ as untimely, but
`
`nonetheless invited me to provide support for the acceptance and processing of post-deadline
`
`submissions as timely. A true and correct copy of my March 5, 2021, follow-up email to Messrs.
`
`Langham, Ross, and Ms. Farleigh providing that support is attached here at Exhibit C.
`
`10.
`
`Claimants and EPPs were unable to reach resolution, forcing Claimants to
`
`preserve their claims in this action by filing the instant Reply Memorandum.
`
` certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
` I
`
`Executed this 10th day of March, 2021, in Washington, DC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Emma K. Burton
`Emma K. Burton
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket