throbber
Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38699 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38700 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 16393
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38701 Filed 03/10/21 Page 3 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 2 of 9 Pg ID 16394
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`IN RE: REFRIGERANT COMPRESSORS
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`
`This document Relates to
`ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MDL No. 2:09-md-02042-SFC
`
`
`HONORABLE SEAN F. COX
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`DECLARATION OF LORI L. CASTANEDA REGARDING THE REFRIGERANT
`COMPRESSORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION DISTRIBUTION
`
`I, Lori L. Castaneda, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a Vice President of Garden City Group, LLC (“GCG”). The following
`
`statements are based on my personal knowledge and information provided by other experienced
`
`GCG employees working under my supervision, and, if called on to do so, I could and would
`
`testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`GCG is serving in this matter as the Claims Administrator assisting with various
`
`tasks, including: disseminating Notices and claims forms; publishing Summary Notices;
`
`receiving and processing claims and requests for exclusion; responding to Class Member
`
`inquiries; establishing and maintaining a settlement website; and performing such other duties as
`
`may be directed by the Court or the Parties including distribution of Settlement Funds.
`
`3.
`
`This Declaration discusses the administrative work that GCG has performed and
`
`the determinations made with respect to the processing of claims filed in connection with the
`
`DECLARATION OF LORI L. CASTANEDA RE DISTRIBUTION
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38702 Filed 03/10/21 Page 4 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 3 of 9 Pg ID 16395
`
`
`
`1
`
`Refrigerant Compressors Antitrust Litigation (“Settlements”) by Plaintiffs with the following
`
`2
`
`Defendants: (1) Tecumseh Products Company, Tecumseh Compressor Company, Tecumseh do
`
`3
`
`Brasil, Ltda and their subsidiaries and affiliates (“Tecumseh Defendants”); (2) Embraco North
`
`4
`
`America, Inc. and Whirlpool S.A. (“Embraco Defendants”); (3) Danfoss Flensburg GmbH,
`
`5
`
`formerly Danfoss Compressors GmbH (“Danfoss Flensburg”), and; (4) Panasonic Corporation
`
`6
`
`and Panasonic Corporation of North America (“Panasonic Defendants”).
`
`7
`
`8
`
`CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION
`
`4.
`
`Claims Received. GCG received and reviewed claims for validity and inclusion
`
`9
`
`in the Settlements. The postmark deadline for Class Members to file claims was June 9, 2014. To
`
`10
`
`make a claim, Class Members were required to complete the approved Claim Form. GCG
`
`11
`
`received a total of 164 timely Claim Forms and eight (8) late Claim Forms, for a total of 172
`
`12
`
`claims received. GCG reviewed claims for completeness, identification of duplicative claims,
`
`13
`
`timeliness, fraud, and, where high values were claimed whether the claim could be supported by
`
`14
`
`documentation and defendant data.
`
`15
`
`5.
`
`Duplicate Claims. During the claims administration process, some claims were
`
`16
`
`identified to be duplicative, meaning they were submitted for the same entity and same value. In
`
`17
`
`total, four (4) claims were identified as such and were removed from further review and
`
`18
`
`processing, leaving 168 unique claims.
`
`19
`
`6.
`
`Late Claims. As stated above, eight (8) claims were received after the postmark
`
`20
`
`deadline. None of these claims were received so late as to interfere with the claims
`
`21
`
`administration process. However, after the claims review process described below, it was
`
`22
`
`determined that only four (4) of the late claims were valid claims. GCG has included these
`
`23
`
`remaining four late claims in the group of claims discussed below and in the calculation of award
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`DECLARATION OF LORI L. CASTANEDA RE DISTRIBUTION
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38703 Filed 03/10/21 Page 5 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 4 of 9 Pg ID 16396
`
`
`
`1
`
`amounts. If approved by the Court, they will be included in the distribution of award payments.
`
`2
`
`7.
`
`Claim Review, Deficiency, and Audit Process. The Claim Form required each
`
`3
`
`claimant to provide the U.S. Dollar amount of Compressor purchases in the United States from
`
`4
`
`one or more Defendants during the Class Period. GCG reviewed all Claim Forms for
`
`5
`
`completeness and collected the information provided, including any supporting documentation
`
`6
`
`submitted, in GCG’s proprietary database. GCG also audited all claims received and compared
`
`7
`
`the stated purchase amounts against purchase data provided to GCG by the Defendants. Through
`
`8
`
`the review process, GCG identified claims where further information was needed to verify the
`
`9
`
`claim and claims that were deficient due to a failure to provide required information.
`
`10
`
`Deficiencies included:
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
` Failure to provide purchase amount(s);
`
` provided amounts that did not correspond to the amounts contained in Defendants’
`
`data;
`
` name not found in defendant data as purchaser.
`
`15
`
`
`
`GCG mailed or otherwise communicated to Class Members identified deficiencies and
`
`16
`
`discrepancies with Defendants’ data and provided opportunities to cure said deficiencies and
`
`17
`
`provide further data. A total of 136 of 168 claims submitted information that did not align with
`
`18
`
`Defendants’ data or were deemed deficient. These claimants were sent a letter requesting further
`
`19
`
`information to correct the deficiency or validate their claim. As necessary, after receiving any
`
`20
`
`written responses, GCG engaged in additional follow-up discussions with claimants via
`
`21
`
`telephone and email concerning their responses and the supporting documentation provided.
`
`22
`
`After GCG reviewed all responses and documentation, 85 of the 136 claims remained deficient,
`
`23
`
`were withdrawn, or did not pass the audit review. All of the claims that did not pass the review
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`DECLARATION OF LORI L. CASTANEDA RE DISTRIBUTION
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38704 Filed 03/10/21 Page 6 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 5 of 9 Pg ID 16397
`
`
`
`1
`
`process ultimately revealed themselves to not be eligible for one or more of the following
`
`2
`
`reasons:
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
` The compressors were not purchased in U.S. Dollars or were purchased outside of the
`
`United States;
`
`the compressors purchased were greater than one horsepower;
`
`the compressors were not purchased during the class period;
`
`the compressors were not purchased individually, but were purchased as components
`
`of integrated products, such as condensing units or refrigeration decks;
`
`the compressors were not purchased directly from one of the Defendants.
`
`Eligible Claims. After GCG’s review of all claims, the total number of claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`eligible for payment in the Settlements is 83.
`
`9.
`
`Settlement Funds. Based on the escrow statements provided to GCG, a total of
`
`$21,112,110.52 in settlement funds are available from the Settling Defendants as detailed below;
`
` Tecumseh Defendants: $4,996,033.76;
`
` Embraco Defendants: $8,255,533.99;
`
` Danfoss Flensburg: $2,413,366.34; and
`
` Panasonic Defendants: $5,447,176.43.
`
`The balances above include earned interest and reflect reductions for the payment of
`
`attorneys’ fees, expenses, and incentive awards approved by the Court.
`
`10.
`
`Administrative Fees and Expenses. Pursuant to the Defendants’ Settlement
`
`Agreements, up to a total of $752,214.18 in the Tecumseh, Danfoss, and Embracco escrow
`
`accounts are available to pay administration costs and expenses. GCG anticipates that
`
`administrative fees and expenses, including publication of notice, direct mail of notice, class
`
`DECLARATION OF LORI L. CASTANEDA RE DISTRIBUTION
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38705 Filed 03/10/21 Page 7 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 6 of 9 Pg ID 16398
`
`
`
`1
`
`member communications, the deficiency and audit process, bank fees, and the award distribution,
`
`2
`
`will be $269,850.
`
`3
`
`11.
`
`Net Settlement Fund. Taking into account the fees paid and adjustments to the
`
`4
`
`Settlement Fund described above, the total amount available for distribution to claimants at this
`
`5
`
`time (the “Net Settlement Fund”) is $20,842,260.52, including earned interest. The Net
`
`6
`
`Settlement Fund is in accordance with the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court, and in
`
`7
`
`consultation with Settlement Class Counsel.
`
`8
`
`12.
`
`Recommended Allocations. GCG has calculated awards in accordance with the
`
`9
`
`Plan of Allocation. GCG has included all claims approved in the review process including late
`
`10
`
`claims. The high, low, and average award amounts are $4,696,247.37, $33.14, and $251,111.57,
`
`11
`
`respectively. Using the purchase data as provided by the defendants and confirmed by the
`
`12
`
`claimants, the rate of return on purchase amounts is approximately 3.74%. Attached as Exhibit
`
`13
`
`A is a chart showing information about each claimant’s purchases and GCG’s application of pro
`
`14
`
`rata awards pursuant to the Plan of Allocation. The chart identifies each claimant by claim
`
`15
`
`number and provides the amounts in U.S. Dollars of their approved purchases. It also notes
`
`16
`
`whether the claim was received after the claims deadline.
`
`17
`
`13.
`
`Upon Court approval of the above, GCG is prepared to commence distribution for
`
`18
`
`the Settlements in accordance with the calculations noted above and the Plan of Allocation.
`
`19
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States of America
`
`20
`
`that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`Executed on this 8th day of March, 2017, at Seattle, Washington.
`
`
`
`__________________________________
` LORI L. CASTANEDA
`
`DECLARATION OF LORI L. CASTANEDA RE DISTRIBUTION
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38706 Filed 03/10/21 Page 8 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 7 of 9 Pg ID 16399
`
`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38707 Filed 03/10/21 Page 9 of 10
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 8 of 9 Pg ID 16400
`
`Timely Unique ID Embracco Claim Danfoss Claim Panasonic Claim Tecumseh Claim Total Award
`Yes
`1000278
`$79,427,949.00 $79,427,949.00
`$79,427,949.00
`$79,427,949.00 $4,696,247.37
`Yes
`1000081
`$46,193,663.00 $46,193,663.00
`$46,193,663.00
`$46,193,663.00 $2,731,240.97
`Yes
`1000259
`$40,521,141.00 $40,521,141.00
`$40,521,141.00
`$40,521,141.00 $2,395,848.12
`Yes
`1000126
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$223,770,085.00 $1,950,220.49
`Yes
`1000104
`$27,067,619.00 $27,067,619.00
`$27,067,619.00
`$27,067,619.00 $1,600,396.80
`Yes
`2000052
`$22,041,537.22 $22,041,537.22
`$22,041,537.22
`$22,041,537.22 $1,303,225.29
`Yes
`3000006
`$17,077,487.00 $17,077,487.00
`$17,077,487.00
`$17,077,487.00 $1,009,721.45
`Yes
`1000280
`$10,804,297.40 $10,804,297.40
`$10,804,297.40
`$10,804,297.40
`$638,813.58
`Yes
`2000189
`$8,657,571.00
`$8,657,571.00
`$8,657,571.00
`$8,657,571.00
`$511,886.51
`Yes
`2000178
`$8,308,336.20
`$8,308,336.20
`$8,308,336.20
`$8,308,336.20
`$491,237.68
`Yes
`73
`$7,452,431.00
`$7,452,431.00
`$7,452,431.00
`$7,452,431.00
`$440,631.54
`Yes
`1000136
`$6,896,095.00
`$6,896,095.00
`$6,896,095.00
`$6,896,095.00
`$407,737.69
`Yes
`1000289
`$4,445,350.00
`$4,445,350.00
`$4,445,350.00
`$4,445,350.00
`$262,835.24
`Yes
`2000108
`$3,956,078.60
`$3,956,078.60
`$3,956,078.60
`$3,956,078.60
`$233,906.64
`Yes
`1000703
`$2,972,084.67
`$2,972,084.67
`$2,972,084.67
`$2,972,084.67
`$175,727.12
`Yes
`2000246
`$2,964,634.00
`$2,964,634.00
`$2,964,634.00
`$2,964,634.00
`$175,286.60
`Yes
`2000094
`$2,682,257.00
`$2,682,257.00
`$2,682,257.00
`$2,682,257.00
`$158,590.81
`Yes
`72
`$2,298,127.40
`$2,298,127.40
`$2,298,127.40
`$2,298,127.40
`$135,878.80
`Yes
`1000103
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$14,949,508.00
`$130,289.25
`Yes
`1000203
`$2,069,777.21
`$2,069,777.21
`$2,069,777.21
`$2,069,777.21
`$122,377.39
`Yes
`1000171
`$1,966,303.00
`$1,966,303.00
`$1,966,303.00
`$1,966,303.00
`$116,259.39
`Yes
`1000291
`$1,716,549.07
`$1,716,549.07
`$1,716,549.07
`$1,716,549.07
`$101,492.48
`Yes
`1000742
`$1,549,702.39
`$1,549,702.39
`$1,549,702.39
`$1,549,702.39
`$91,627.51
`Yes
`1000112
`$1,465,772.92
`$1,465,772.92
`$1,465,772.92
`$1,465,772.92
`$86,665.11
`Yes
`1000239
`$1,044,089.73
`$1,044,089.73
`$1,044,089.73
`$1,044,089.73
`$61,732.72
`Yes
`2000164
`$915,729.01
`$915,729.01
`$915,729.01
`$915,729.01
`$54,143.28
`Yes
`1000334
`$883,296.00
`$883,296.00
`$883,296.00
`$883,296.00
`$52,225.65
`Yes
`3000001
`$796,739.00
`$796,739.00
`$796,739.00
`$796,739.00
`$47,107.90
`Yes
`1000473
`$705,914.07
`$705,914.07
`$705,914.07
`$705,914.07
`$41,737.78
`Yes
`1000199
`$682,087.73
`$682,087.73
`$682,087.73
`$682,087.73
`$40,329.04
`Yes
`1000482
`$602,501.00
`$602,501.00
`$602,501.00
`$602,501.00
`$35,623.41
`Yes
`2000139
`$601,905.00
`$601,905.00
`$601,905.00
`$601,905.00
`$35,588.16
`Yes
`1000751
`$588,643.00
`$588,643.00
`$588,643.00
`$588,643.00
`$34,804.04
`Yes
`1000405
`$586,105.00
`$586,105.00
`$586,105.00
`$586,105.00
`$34,653.97
`Yes
`2000238
`$572,703.70
`$572,703.70
`$572,703.70
`$572,703.70
`$33,861.61
`Yes
`2000105
`$562,507.30
`$562,507.30
`$562,507.30
`$562,507.30
`$33,258.74
`Yes
`1000246
`$524,176.00
`$524,176.00
`$524,176.00
`$524,176.00
`$30,992.36
`Yes
`2000120
`$516,495.92
`$516,495.92
`$516,495.92
`$516,495.92
`$30,538.27
`Yes
`1000133
`$483,303.63
`$483,303.63
`$483,303.63
`$483,303.63
`$28,575.75
`Yes
`1000140
`$464,627.00
`$464,627.00
`$464,627.00
`$464,627.00
`$27,471.49
`Yes
`1000290
`$395,512.00
`$395,512.00
`$395,512.00
`$395,512.00
`$23,384.99
`Yes
`2000223
`$330,081.53
`$330,081.53
`$330,081.53
`$330,081.53
`$19,516.37
`Yes
`1000311
`$326,752.11
`$326,752.11
`$326,752.11
`$326,752.11
`$19,319.51
`Yes
`29
`$287,919.67
`$287,919.67
`$287,919.67
`$287,919.67
`$17,023.50
`Yes
`1000692
`$272,777.56
`$272,777.56
`$272,777.56
`$272,777.56
`$16,128.21
`Yes
`75
`$257,399.13
`$257,399.13
`$257,399.13
`$257,399.13
`$15,218.95
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2125-15, PageID.38708 Filed 03/10/21 Page 10 of
`2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 607-1 Filed 03/08/17 Pg 9 of 9 Pg ID 16401
`10
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`No
`No
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`No
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`No
`
`2000109
`1000395
`1000599
`2000137
`1000722
`1000487
`1000096
`1000115
`1000647
`1000032
`2000042
`1000517
`1000283
`1000436
`1000708
`1000542
`1000581
`1000607
`2000198
`1000182
`1000624
`1000513
`1000616
`1000271
`1000003
`1000415
`2000142
`1000245
`2000048
`1000188
`1000417
`1000255
`105
`1000470
`1000427
`1000512
`1000739
`
`$241,856.90
`$237,421.80
`$236,104.09
`$194,022.96
`$162,207.57
`$103,611.00
`$92,019.00
`$82,186.15
`$79,961.81
`$76,380.00
`$74,334.10
`$73,431.56
`$73,213.00
`$71,968.74
`$61,411.67
`$45,263.19
`$44,734.50
`$43,120.00
`$41,569.42
`$40,854.00
`$39,409.13
`$38,684.20
`$36,221.29
`$34,910.00
`$31,806.00
`$20,892.67
`$18,986.70
`$17,201.00
`$14,683.49
`$14,304.00
`$10,307.82
`$10,064.00
`$9,616.00
`$4,791.78
`$2,449.45
`$2,170.00
`$560.44
`
`$241,856.90
`$237,421.80
`$236,104.09
`$194,022.96
`$162,207.57
`$103,611.00
`$92,019.00
`$82,186.15
`$79,961.81
`$76,380.00
`$74,334.10
`$73,431.56
`$73,213.00
`$71,968.74
`$61,411.67
`$45,263.19
`$44,734.50
`$43,120.00
`$41,569.42
`$40,854.00
`$39,409.13
`$38,684.20
`$36,221.29
`$34,910.00
`$31,806.00
`$20,892.67
`$18,986.70
`$17,201.00
`$14,683.49
`$14,304.00
`$10,307.82
`$10,064.00
`$9,616.00
`$4,791.78
`$2,449.45
`$2,170.00
`$560.44
`
`$241,856.90
`$237,421.80
`$236,104.09
`$194,022.96
`$162,207.57
`$103,611.00
`$92,019.00
`$82,186.15
`$79,961.81
`$76,380.00
`$74,334.10
`$73,431.56
`$73,213.00
`$71,968.74
`$61,411.67
`$45,263.19
`$44,734.50
`$43,120.00
`$41,569.42
`$40,854.00
`$39,409.13
`$38,684.20
`$36,221.29
`$34,910.00
`$31,806.00
`$20,892.67
`$18,986.70
`$17,201.00
`$14,683.49
`$14,304.00
`$10,307.82
`$10,064.00
`$9,616.00
`$4,791.78
`$2,449.45
`$2,170.00
`$560.44
`
`$241,856.90
`$237,421.80
`$236,104.09
`$194,022.96
`$162,207.57
`$103,611.00
`$92,019.00
`$82,186.15
`$79,961.81
`$76,380.00
`$74,334.10
`$73,431.56
`$73,213.00
`$71,968.74
`$61,411.67
`$45,263.19
`$44,734.50
`$43,120.00
`$41,569.42
`$40,854.00
`$39,409.13
`$38,684.20
`$36,221.29
`$34,910.00
`$31,806.00
`$20,892.67
`$18,986.70
`$17,201.00
`$14,683.49
`$14,304.00
`$10,307.82
`$10,064.00
`$9,616.00
`$4,791.78
`$2,449.45
`$2,170.00
`$560.44
`
`$14,300.00
`$14,037.77
`$13,959.85
`$11,471.79
`$9,590.67
`$6,126.09
`$5,440.70
`$4,859.34
`$4,727.82
`$4,516.03
`$4,395.07
`$4,341.71
`$4,328.78
`$4,255.22
`$3,631.02
`$2,676.22
`$2,644.96
`$2,549.51
`$2,457.83
`$2,415.52
`$2,330.10
`$2,287.23
`$2,141.62
`$2,064.08
`$1,880.56
`$1,235.30
`$1,122.60
`$1,017.02
`$868.17
`$845.74
`$609.47
`$595.04
`$568.55
`$283.32
`$144.83
`$128.30
`$33.14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket