`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`IN RE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`
`
`Case No. 12-md-2311
`
`Sean F. Cox
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`OPINION AND ORDER
`
`In this multidistrict litigation, the Court denied the motion to intervene filed by Financial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Recovery Services, LLC (“FRS”) on November 17, 2020. (ECF No. 2101.) FRS timely appealed
`
`to the Sixth Circuit, where the case has not yet been argued. (ECF No. 2105.) Then, FRS filed an
`
`“Emergency Motion to Compel Acceptance and Processing of Vehicle Data” with this Court on
`
`February 17, 2021. (ECF No. 2114.) The Court construed that motion as a motion for
`
`reconsideration, under Local Rule 7.1(h), and denied it on April 28, 2021. (ECF No. 2134.) Now,
`
`FRS asks this Court to reconsider its April 28 opinion while the end-payor plaintiffs have moved
`
`to strike. (ECF Nos. 2137, 2138.)
`
`The Court agrees with end-payor plaintiffs that this is an improper motion. The Court
`
`already considered—and rejected—a motion to reconsider from FRS. There is no need to have
`
`briefing or otherwise continue to entertain a motion that “merely present[s] the same issues ruled
`
`upon by the Court.” See E.D. Mich. LR 7.3(h)(3).
`
`End-payor plaintiffs’ motion to strike is hereby GRANTED and FRS’ motion for
`
` 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2140, PageID.39465 Filed 05/19/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`reconsideration is hereby DENIED.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: May 19, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Sean F. Cox
`Sean F. Cox
`U. S. District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
