throbber
Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2169, PageID.39655 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`IN RE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`
`Master File No. 12-md-02311
`Honorable Sean F. Cox
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
`ALL END-PAYOR ACTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`
`
`FURTHER STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER BRIEFING ON PENDING MOTION TO
`ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS
`
`WHEREAS, on September 15, 2021, the attorneys representing Element Fleet
`
`Corporation; Wheels, Inc.; Donlen LLC, and Automotive Rentals, Inc. filed a
`
`Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreements (Dkt. No. 2149);
`
`WHEREAS, on September 27, 2021, End-Payor Plaintiffs (“EPPs”), by and
`
`through their Court-appointed counsel (“class counsel”), filed an unopposed motion
`
`to extend the deadline to file their objection to the Motion to Enforce Settlement
`
`Agreements until October 13, 2021 (Dkt. No. 2150);
`
`WHEREAS, prior to the October 13, 2021 response date, the interested
`
`entities jointly submitted a stipulation to the Court informing the Court that they
`
`were “confer[ring] about potential resolution of that dispute” and seeking a further
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2169, PageID.39656 Filed 12/09/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`extension of the briefing schedule until November 3, 2021 for the opposition and
`
`until November 17, 2021 for the reply;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court granted that stipulation and proposed briefing schedule
`
`on October 13, 2021 (Dkt. 2154);
`
`WHEREAS, prior to the November 3, 2021 deadline for the opposition, the
`
`interested entities once again jointly submitted a stipulation to the Court informing
`
`the Court that they were making “headway on a potential resolution to the dispute
`
`but more time is needed to complete those discussions” and sought a further
`
`extension of the briefing schedule until November 24, 2021 for the opposition and
`
`until December 8, 2021 for the reply;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court granted that stipulation and proposed briefing schedule
`
`on November 2, 2021 (Dkt. 2160);
`
`WHEREAS, prior to the November 24, 2021 deadline for the opposition, the
`
`interested entities once again jointly submitted a stipulation to the Court informing
`
`the Court that they “have mostly resolved the dispute and are negotiating a few minor
`
`details but need one final two-week extension given the Thanksgiving holiday” and
`
`sought a further extension of the briefing schedule until December 8, 2021 for the
`
`opposition and until December 22, 2021 for the reply;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court granted that stipulation and proposed briefing schedule
`
`on November 24, 2021 (Dkt. 2166);
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2169, PageID.39657 Filed 12/09/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, pursuant to that Order, EPPs’ response to the Motion to Enforce
`
`Settlement Agreements is currently due on December 8, 2021;
`
`WHEREAS, the interested entities have made significant progress and have a
`
`working stipulation to resolve this dispute, there remain a few outstanding details
`
`that have cropped up relating to the data and complicated claims in this matter such
`
`that the interested entities need one more two-week extension to resolve these issues
`
`and this dispute in its entirety.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for Element
`
`Fleet Corporation; Wheels, Inc.; Donlen LLC, and Automotive Rentals, Inc. and by
`
`class counsel that:
`
`1. EPPs’ Response to the Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreements shall be
`
`extended two more weeks until December 22, 2021.
`
`2. Any Reply to the Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreements shall be due
`
`on January 5, 2022.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: December 9, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Sean F. Cox
`Sean F. Cox
`U. S. District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2169, PageID.39658 Filed 12/09/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`STIPULATED AND AGREED.
`
`BALCH & BINGHAM LLP
`
`/s/ L. Conrad Anderson IV
`Gregory C. Cook
`L. Conrad Anderson IV
`1901 6th Avenue North
`Suite 1500
`Birmingham, AL 35203
`Telephone: (205) 251-8100
`gcook@balch.com
`canderson@balch.com
`
`Tyler P. Bishop
`BALCH & BINGHAM LLP
`30 Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd., NW
`Suite 700
`Atlanta, Georgia 30308
`Telephone: (404) 962-3521
`tbishop@balch.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Element Fleet
`Corporation, Wheels, Inc.,
`Donlen LLC, and Automotive
`Rentals, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jenna G. Farleigh
`Marc M. Seltzer
`Steven G. Sklaver
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`Telephone: (310) 789-3100
`mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com
`ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Terrell W. Oxford
`Chanler A. Langham
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street, 5100
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone: (713) 651-9366
`toxford@susmangodfrey.com
`clangham@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Floyd G. Short
`Jenna G. Farleigh
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
`Seattle, Washington 98101
`Telephone: (206) 516-3880
`fshort@susmangodfrey.com
`jfarleigh@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Adam J. Zapala
`Elizabeth Castillo
`COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
`San Francisco Airport Office Center
`840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
`Burlingame, California 94010
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-md-02311-SFC-RSW ECF No. 2169, PageID.39659 Filed 12/09/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`Telephone: (650) 697-6000
`azapala@cpmlegal.com
`ecastillo@cpmlegal.com
`
`William V. Reiss
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`399 Park Avenue, Suite 3600
`New York, New York 10022
`Telephone: (212) 980-7400
`wreiss@ robinskaplan.com
`
`Attorneys for End-Payor Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket