throbber

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`EXHIBIT
`1009
`
`1009
`
`

`

`US 6,603,134 B1
`(10) Patent No.:
`(12)Un1ted States Patent
`
`Wild et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Aug. 5, 2003
`
`US006603134B1
`
`(54) OPTICAL DETECTION SYSTEM
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Norman R, Wild, Nashua, NH (US);
`Paul M. Leavy, Jr., Lynnfield, MA
`(US)
`
`(73) Assignee: BAE Systems Information and
`Electronic Systems Integration Inc.,
`Nashua, NH (US)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.2 04/623,186
`(22)
`Filed:
`Mar. 10, 1967
`
`(51)
`
`(52) US. Cl.
`
`Int. Cl.7 ........................... B64D 1/04; G01B 11/26;
`G01] 5/02
`........................ 250/526; 89/111; 250/342,
`356/1381
`(58) Field of Search ....................... 343/18 E; 331/945,
`250/8331 R, 526, 342; 88/1 M, 1 U; 356/209,
`138.1; 89/1.11
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2/1962 Kingsbury ................. 88/1 Ux
`3,020,792 A *
`
`7/1963
`250/833
`3,098,932 A *
`3,215,842 A * 11/1965 Thomas .................... 343/18 X
`4,112,300 A *
`9/1978 Hall et al.
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Electronics, Nov. 10, 1961, pp. 81—85.*
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner—Stephen C. Buczinski
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Daniel J. Long
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`.
`.
`.
`.
`The present invention pertains to radlant energy systems and
`more particularly to systems exhibiting the retroreflection
`principle wherein the system comprises a focusing means
`and a surface exhibiting some degree of reflectivity posi-
`tioned near the focal plane of the device, and wherein
`incident radiation falling within the field-of-View of said
`system is reflected back in a direction which is parallel to the
`incident radiation. The present invention has great applica-
`bility in military optical system applications for detecting
`the presence of an enemy employing surveillance equipment
`and for neutralizing this surveillance capability.
`
`2,970,310 A *
`
`1/1961 Bruce ....................... 343/13 X
`
`47 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`Panasonic Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1009
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 5, 2003
`
`Sheet 1 0f3
`
`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`26R zen/"ll, 3’2 I
`
`
`
`FIG.1
`
`48
`
`36
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ _
`.
`>
`
`' ."V."
`.‘OQVVV‘V¥3!\\\‘
`“9&3lel?3§:?:9.0‘1€ofofm~>
`
`
`
`36R
`37 I
`"
`
`:30A
`
`_
`
`20c
`46
`
`
` y;vzsz¢gomnm«»‘.}‘
`\\\\\\\\\‘“\\\\\
`‘msoc
`
`WWW '9'va *8
`
`"
`‘
`
`Fl 6 - 4-
`
`48R
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 5, 2003
`
`Sheet 2 0f3
`
`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 5, 2003
`
`Sheet 3 0f3
`
`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`I7|
`
`I70
`
`|66
`
`l68
`
`164
`
`
`FIG. 10.
`
`
`SCANNING AND
`POSITIONING
`MEANS
`
`
`
`I88
`
`I90
`
`COMMON
`
`POWE R AN D
`CONTROL
`MEANS
`
`SEA R C H
`
` OPTICAL
`
`
`INSTRUMENT
`
`HIGH ENERGY
`
`LASER GUN
`
`
`FIG. 12.
`
`f
`
`E
`
`ZIO
`
`; EZIZ
`
`I
`
`E
`
`ZIO
`
`; EZIZ
`
`2|:f;
`
`\{
`
`2|0
`
`§§2|4
`
`FIG- 14.
`
`40o
`
`204%
`
`206
`
`202
`
`FIG. 13.
`
`

`

`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`1
`OPTICAL DETECTION SYSTEM
`
`Applicants herein have made the discovery that any type
`of focusing device in combination with a surface, exhibiting
`any degree of reflectivity and positioned near the focal plane
`of the device, acts as a retro-reflector. A retroreflector is
`defined as a reflector wherein incident rays or radiant energy
`and reflected rays are parallel for any angle of incidence
`within the field-of-view. Acharacteristic of a retroreflector is
`that the energy impinging thereon is reflected in a very
`narrow beam, herein referred to as the retroreflected beam.
`This phenomenon is termed retroreflection.
`It is herein to be noted that the term radiant energy
`includes light energy, radio frequency, microwave energy,
`acoustical energy, X-ray energy, heat energy and any other
`types of energy which are part of the energy spectrum and
`which are capable of being retroreflected by the device,
`instrument or system sought to be detected.
`One type of optical device which exhibits this
`phenomenon, and thus is a particular type of retroreflector,
`is a corner reflector consisting of three mutually perpen-
`dicular reflecting planes, However, this type of retroreflector
`is both difficult and expensive to fabricate.
`Due to the applicants discovery,
`it has now become
`possible to accomplish a great many feats heretofore con-
`sidered impossible, as will become more apparent from the
`discussion to follow hereinafter. In this context it should be
`noted that the eyes of human beings, as well as those of
`animals, operate as retroreflectors. Also, any optical instru-
`ment which includes a focusing lens and a surface having
`some degree of reflectivity, no matter how small, positioned
`near the focal point of the lens, act as a retroreflector,
`whereby any radiant energy from a radiant energy source
`directed at these instruments is reflected back towards the
`source in a substantially collimated narrow beam.
`It is therefore the primary object of the present invention
`to provide a method and apparatus for detecting objects
`exhibiting retroreflection characteristics.
`It is another object of the present invention to provide a
`method and apparatus to detect objects having retroreflec-
`tion characteristics by illuminating the same with a radiant
`energy source.
`It is a more particular object of the present invention to
`provide a method and apparatus for scanning an area to
`detect
`the presence of optical
`instruments such as
`binoculars, telescopes, periscopes, range finders, cameras,
`and the like.
`
`It is a further object of the present invention to provide
`means and apparatus for determining the characteristics of a
`device exhibiting retroreflection characteristics from a
`remote location.
`
`It is a further object of the present invention to provide
`a method and apparatus for detecting optical instruments for
`rendering the instruments ineffective and for neutralizing
`humans utilizing said instruments by employing lasers or
`similar high energy sources.
`It is yet another object of the present invention to provide
`a method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving
`radiant energy utilizing concentric optics.
`These and other objects, features and advantages of the
`present
`invention will become more apparent from the
`following detailed discussion considered in conjunction
`with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
`FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a retroreflection system
`consisting of a lens and a reflector wherein the source
`radiation is parallel to the optical axis of the lens.
`FIG. 2 is a diagram of a retroreflection system similar to
`that of FIG. 1, wherein the source radiation is not parallel to
`the optical axis of the lens.
`
`2
`FIG. 3 is a diagram of a retroreflection system similar to
`FIG. 1 wherein the lens is imperfect so as to form an image
`rather than focusing at a single point.
`FIG. 4 is a diagram of a retroreflection system wherein
`the reflector is obliquely positioned with respect
`to the
`optical axis of the lens.
`FIG. 5 is a diagram of a human eye, wherein there is
`depicted the retroreflection characteristics thereof.
`FIG. 6 is a schematic representation depicting a beam
`splitting optical system for transmitting and receiving radi-
`ant energy.
`FIG. 7 is a schematic representation depicting a concen-
`tric optical system for transmitting and receiving radiant
`energy.
`FIG. 7a is a schematic representation of another embodi-
`ment of the concentric optical system depicted in FIG. 7.
`FIG. 7b is a schematic representation of still another
`embodiment of the concentric optical system depicted in
`FIG. 7.
`
`FIG. 8 is a schematic representation depicting an ordi-
`nary telescope as an image forming system having retrore-
`flection characteristics.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`FIG. 9 is a schematic representation depicting one half of
`an ordinary binocular as an image forming system having
`retroreflection.
`
`25
`
`FIG. 10 is a schematic representation depicting an ordi-
`nary periscope as an image system having retroreflection
`characteristics.
`
`30
`
`FIG. 11 is a schematic representation depicting an ordi-
`nary camera as an image forming system having retrore-
`flection characteristics.
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`FIG. 12 depicts a system for scanning an area to detect
`the presence of optical instruments by utilizing the retrore-
`flection characteristics thereof and for neutralizing observers
`using said optical instruments, and/or rendering the instru-
`ments ineffective.
`
`FIG. 13 is a diagram of a radar system, and more
`particularly of a radar antenna which is to be detected in
`accordance with the principles of the present invention.
`FIG. 14 depicts the waveforms obtained during the
`detection of the radar system shown in FIG. 13.
`In accordance with the general principles of the present
`invention an optical system consisting of a focusing lens and
`a reflective surface positioned near the focal plane of said
`lens has radiant energy rays supplied thereto by a radiant
`energy transmitter. The radiant energy rays reflected by the
`optical system due to its retroreflection characteristics are
`recovered by a radiant energy receiver to thereby detect the
`presence and relative position of said optical system. The
`output of the radiant energy receiver may be applied to a
`utilization means for determining the characteristics of the
`retroreflector or for directing a weapon means.
`Referring now to the drawings and more particularly to
`FIG. 1 thereof, there is shown an optical system consisting
`of a lens 20 and a reflective surface 22, which herein is a
`mirror, positioned in the focal plane 24 of the lens 20. Rays
`of radiation 26 and 28, respectively, are directed towards the
`system, and more particularly towards the lens 20, from a
`radiation source (not shown); the incident rays in the present
`illustration being parallel to the optical axis 30 of the lens.
`It is herein to be noted that for the purpose of clarity the
`incident rays are herein shown as being confined to the top
`half of the lens 20. The incident rays 26 and 28 are refracted
`by the lens 20 and focused at the focal point 32 of the lens,
`which focal point lies on the mirror 22. The rays are then
`reflected by the mirror so that the angle of reflection equals
`the angle of incidence, and are returned to the lower half of
`
`

`

`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`3
`the lens where they are again refracted and emerge there-
`from as retroreflected rays 26R and 28R. The rays 26R and
`28R are returned to the radiation source parallel to the
`incident rays 26 and 28 thereof. However, as shown in the
`drawing, the relative positions of the rays 26 and 28 are
`inverted so that the image returned to the radiation source is
`also inverted.
`
`In the optical system depicted in FIG. 2, similar parts are
`de-noted by similar reference numerals. In this system the
`rays 34 and 36 are not parallel to the optical axis 30A of both
`the lens 20A and the mirror 22A, the mirror 22A being
`positioned in the focal plane 24A of the lens. The rays 34 and
`36 are refracted by the lens 20A and focused at a point 37
`removed from the optical axis but still on the focal plane.
`The rays 34 and 36 are reflected by the mirror. Both of the
`rays 34 and 36 would normally emerge from the lens as
`retroreflected rays 34R and 36R, after refraction by the lens,
`and would be returned to the source of the rays 34 and 36 in
`a direction parallel thereto. However, since the lens 20A is
`of finite size, the reflected ray 34R will miss the lens and will
`not be retroreflected. The loss of reflected rays in this
`manner is called “vignetting”.
`In the system depicted in FIG. 3 wherein similar parts are
`de-noted by similar reference numerals,
`the lens 20B is
`assumed to be imperfect; i.e., it has aberrations. In this case
`the rays 38 and 40 are parallel to the optical axis 30B but are
`not focused at a single point on the focal plane 24B, and
`instead form an image on the mirror 22B, which image is
`referred to as the circle of confusion. In most practical
`optical systems there are circles of confusion and the mirror
`is normally positioned at
`the plane of least circle of
`confusion, herein depicted by the reference numeral 42.
`Thus, the image formed on the mirror by means of the rays
`38 and 40 can be considered to be a radiant source, and the
`retroreflected rays 38R and 40R exit from the lens 20B
`substantially parallel to each other. This is possible since
`each emerging ray can be paired with a parallel incident ray
`which radiates from a common point of the image source
`located at the mirror 22B.
`
`In the system depicted in FIG. 4, the reflecting surface or
`mirror 22C, and its axis 44, is tilted with respect to the
`optical axis 30C of lens 20C. However, the ray 48 is again
`retroreflected by the system and the retroreflected ray 48R is
`returned parallel to the incident ray 48. The retroreflected
`ray 46R, due to the ray 46, is lost because of vignetting.
`The concept set forth herein above in conjunction with
`FIG. 3, that the retroreflected rays be considered as radiating
`from a source on the image plane, is highly significant. With
`this concept in mind, it will be readily apparent that even if
`the retroreflecting surface is dispersive, curved, or tilted, (as
`shown in FIG. 4), the system will still exhibit retroreflective
`properties for any and all rays which are returned to the lens
`by the reflecting surface.
`The rays retroreflected by the optical systems depicted in
`FIGS. 1 to 4 are in the form of a narrow, substantially
`collimated beam having a high radiant flux density. It is to
`be noted that there is an actual increase in the radiant flux
`
`density of the retroreflected beam due to the narrowing
`thereof. This increase in radiant flux density is herein termed
`optical gain.
`For example, if the irradiance produced by the radiating
`source at the collecting lens in FIG. 3 is 100 watts/cm2 and
`the area of the lens is 100 cm2, then the radiant flux at the
`image or focal plane (circle of confusion) is
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`
`
`100 watts
`cm2
`
`X100 cmz,
`
`or 104 watts.
`
`It
`
`is a characteristic of a retroreflector to return the
`
`retroreflected energy or rays in a very narrow beam. The
`dimensions of the retroreflected beam is a function of the
`
`angular resolution of the retroreflector which includes the
`lens and the reflecting surface.
`The solid angle into which the incident radiant flux will
`be retroreflected is determined by the square of the angular
`resolution of the retroreflector. If, for example, the resoltuion
`of the optical system is 10'4 radians, the solid angle into
`which the retroreflected beam will be returned is 10'8
`steradians. One steradian being the solid angle subtended at
`the center of a sphere by a portion of the surface of area
`equal to the square of the radius of the sphere. Thus at a
`distance of 104 cm from the focal plane the area of the
`retroreflected beam is only 1.0 cm2. The retroreflector, by
`radiating into such a small solid angle, has radiant intensity
`of
`
`,
`12
`104 watts
`l 0’
`steradian
`f , or 10 watts/steradian
`
`In order to obtain a measure of the optical gain we must
`compare the retroreflector to a standard or reference. This
`reference has been taken to be a diffuse surface known in the
`art as a Lambertian radiator. If the 104 watts of incident
`radiant flux were simply re-radiated in a Lambertian man-
`ner; i. e., into a solid angle of 3.14 (at) steradians, the radiant
`intensity would be
`
`104 watts
`3.14 steradians’ or 3.1 X 10 watts/steradian
`
`Thus, the retroreflector has an overall optical gain equal to
`
`1012 watts/steradian
`3.1 X 103 watts/steradian
`
`,
`
`or 3.l4>< 10
`
`8
`
`Although there is no actual increase in radiant flux, the
`retroreflector has a radiant
`intensity which is 3.14><108
`greater than that of a Lambertain radiator which emits the
`same radiant flux. Thus, for example, a telescope having a
`collecting area of 100 cm2 and an angular resolution of 0.1
`milliradian would appear similar in size to about 3.5><108
`cm2 of a diffuse or Lambertian radiator.
`It should be noted that in almost all cases, the retrore-
`flector will be disposed within an environment that produces
`background radiation in a Lambertian manner. Thus, the
`radiant intensity of the retroreflector is so much greater than
`that of a Lambertian radiator that it is easily discernible from
`the background, even when, (as shown in FIG. 2) a large
`percentage of the retroreflected radiant flux is lost due to
`vignetting.
`It is herein to be noted that the radiant intensity of the
`retroreflected beam is dependent upon the characteristics of
`the optical system employed. If an optical system of the type
`shown in FIGS. 1, 2, and 4 were possible and there were no
`loss of energy (power) entering the system, then the radiant
`intensity gain would be almost infinite since the energy
`would be retroreflected in an almost perfectly collimated
`beam, i.e. a retroreflected beam whose divergence angle is
`
`

`

`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`5
`almost zero. However, almost all optical systems resemble
`that shown in FIG. 3 and the factor which determined the
`divergence angle of the retroreflected beam is the size of the
`circle of confusion and more particularly, the least circle of
`confusion. The size of the least circle of confusion is
`dependent upon the resolution of the system and in particu-
`lar upon the resolution of the focusing lens. Thus, the less
`aberrations in the lens, the better the resolution, the smaller
`the circle of least confusion,
`the smaller the divergence
`angle of the retroreflected beam, and thus the greater the
`optical gain.
`Referring to FIG. 5, there is shown a magnified cross-
`sectional view of a human eye denoted generally by the
`reference numeral 50. The eye includes a cornea 52, an
`anterior chamber 54, a lens 56, and a retina 58. The retina
`has a small portion or point 60 thereon termed the yellow
`spot or macula lutea, which is approximately 2 mm in
`diameter. At the center of the macula lutea is the fovea
`centralis 62 whose diameter is approximately 0.25 m. The
`acuity of vision is greatest at the macula lutea and more
`particularly at the fovea centralis. Thus, the eye is always
`rotated so that the image being examined or the rays entering
`thereon fall on the fovea 62. As seen in FIG. 5, rays 64 and
`66 enter the eye and pass through the cornea 52 and the
`anterior chamber 54 and are refracted by the lens 56 and
`focused on the fovea centralis portion 62 of the retina 58.
`The rays are then reflected, passing through the lens 56,
`anterior chamber 54 and cornea 52 and emerge therefrom as
`retroreflected rays 64R and 66R which are parallel to the
`rays 64 and 66. Thus, it is seen that even the human eye acts
`as a retroreflector.
`
`Referring now to FIG. 6, there is shown an optical system
`for transmitting and receiving radiant energy,
`the more
`particularly a beam splitter for transmitting radiant energy
`and for receiving or recovering a portion of said radiant
`energy.
`The beam splitter includes an optical bench 70 having an
`optical system consisting of a lens 72 and a rotating pattern
`or reticle 74, which may also be a modulator, said system
`being placed on said bench. The beam splitter also includes
`a radiant energy source 76, a collimator 78, a thin plate of
`glass 80 having a semi-reflective coating thereon, a detector
`82. In the operation of the beam splitter, the radiant energy
`from the source 76 is collimated to form a beam by the
`collimator 78 and the beam is directed upon the glass plate
`80, a portion of the energy in the beam being reflected and
`a portion of the energy in the beam being transmitted by the
`glass plate. The energy is then transmitted down the optical
`bench 70 where the lens refracts the transmitted energy and
`focuses the beam upon the reticle 74 from whence is is
`retroreflected back to the glass plate. A portion of the
`retroreflected energy passes through the glass plate and is
`lost, and a portion thereof is reflected by the glass plate and
`detected by means of the detector and the output thereof is
`then fed to the utilization means 83. The detector 82 is thus
`
`effectively positioned within or concentric with the retrore-
`flected energy beam without affecting the transmission of
`radiant energy from the source to the optical system. The
`energy obtained by the utilization means can be used to
`obtain the spectral and temporal characteristics of the ret-
`roreflected beam, and may the be compared with the trans-
`mitted beam to determine various characteristics of the
`
`optical system being investigated. It will be apparent that the
`use of this test instrument makes possible the investigation
`and characterization of optical systems in terms of recording
`the retroreflective characteristics thereof.
`
`The rotating pattern or reticle 74 can be replaced with a
`reflective surface and a modulator placed on the light
`
`6
`incident side of the lens 72. The modulator can then be tilted
`so that none of the light reflected from its surface returns to
`the beam splitter 80 to be reflected to the detector 82. The
`only light then returning to the detector 82 will be that
`modulated by the modulator and reflected back from the
`reflective surface replacing the reticle 74.
`FIG. 7 depicts a folded concentric optical system for
`transmitting and receiving radiant energy—also known as an
`optical transceiver. The optical transceiver 84 includes a
`primary mirror 86 having a substantially parabolic shape, a
`secondary mirror 88 having a planar configuration, a radiant
`energy source 90, a detector 92 and a utilization means 94.
`The primary mirror has an aperature 96 concentric with its
`principal axis and the principal axis of the secondary mirror
`is aligned so as to be coaxial therewith. The light source and
`detector are also aligned with the mirrors so that all of the
`aforesaid elements are concentrically disposed with respect
`to each other. The light source is positioned adjacent to the
`nonreflecting surface of the primary mirror while the detec-
`tor is positioned adjacent to the nonreflecting surface of the
`secondary mirror.
`In the operation of the transceiver 84, rays 98 and 100 are
`emitted by the radiant energy source 90, and impinge upon
`the secondary mirror 88, from whence they are reflected and
`impinge upon the primary mirror 86. The rays are then
`reflected by the primary mirror and directed towards an
`optical instrument 102 which exhibits retroreflective char-
`acteristics. The incident rays are retroreflected by the optical
`instrument 102 and are returned as retroreflected rays 98R
`and 100R. The rays 98R and 100R return in a direction
`parallel to the rays 98 and 100 and impinge upon the primary
`mirror 86 and are reflected thereby towards the detector 92
`where they are detected, and the detector output signal is
`then fed to the utilization means 94.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`instruments
`the term optical
`As discussed previously,
`exhibiting retroreflective characteristics include the eyes of
`animals and humans.
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`A second embodiment of a folded concentric optical
`transceiver is shown in FIG. 7a, wherein similar parts are
`denoted by similar reference numerals.
`In this embodiment the light source 90A is positioned
`adjacent to the nonreflecting surface of the secondary mirror
`88A and the detector 92A is positioned adjacent
`to the
`nonreflecting surface of the primary mirror 86A.
`In the operation of the transceiver 84A, rays 104 and 106
`are emitted by the radiant energy source 90A, and impinge
`upon the primary mirror 86A,
`from whence they are
`reflected towards the optical instrument 102A. The rays are
`retroreflected by the optical instrument and are returned as
`retroreflected rays 104R and 106R. The rays 104R and 106R
`return in a direction parallel to the rays 104 and 106 and
`impinge upon the primary mirror and are reflected thereby
`towards the secondary mirror through the aperture 96A to
`the detector 92A, and the output signal of the detector is then
`fed to the utilization means 94A.
`
`A third embodiment of a folded concentric optical trans-
`ceiver is depicted in FIG. 7b, wherein similar parts are
`denoted by similar reference numerals.
`In this embodiment,
`the detector 92B is once more
`positioned adjacent to the nonreflecting surface of the sec-
`ondary mirror 88B and the radiant energy source 90B is
`positioned between the reflecting surfaces of the primary
`mirror 86B and the secondary mirror 88B. There is also
`included a collector 108, which may be an elliptically
`shaped mirror for collecting the spurious radiation rays from
`the source 90B and reflecting back upon the source, where-
`from they are directed upon the secondary mirror and
`ultimatel directed toward the optical instrument 102B.
`
`

`

`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`7
`In the operation of the transceiver 84B, energy from the
`radiant energy source 90B impinges upon the secondary
`mirror 88B, and more particularly rays 110 and 112 so
`impinge. These rays are reflected by the secondary mirror
`towards the primary mirror, from where they are once more
`reflected towards the optical instrument 102B. The incident
`rays 110 and 112 are then retroreflected by the optical
`instrument and returned as retroreflected rays 110R and
`112R. The rays 110R and 112R return in a direction parallel
`to the rays 110 and 112 and impinge upon the primary mirror
`and are reflected thereby towards the detector 92B where
`they are detected and the output thereof is then fed to the
`utilization means 94B.
`
`It is herein to be noted that although the folded optical
`transceivers depicted in FIGS. 7, 7a, and 7b have been
`shown as being concentric, it is also possible to employ the
`above type of transceivers wherein their optical character-
`istics are not concentric. However, it has been found from
`the view-point of efficiency and efficacy that the concentric
`optical transceivers are more desireable.
`FIG. 8 is an optical schematic representation of a tele-
`scope having an objective lens 116, a reticle 118, a pair of
`erector lenses 120 and 122, a field lens 124, and an eyelens
`126.
`
`Thus, when rays 128 and 129 are directed towards the
`objective 20 lens 116, they are focused on the reticle 118 and
`retroreflected thereby to produce retroreflected rays 128R
`and 129R respectively, whose direction is opposite and
`parallel to that of the incident rays 128 and 129. Thus, the
`combination of the objective lens 116, and the reticle 118
`form a retroreflective optical instrument, in and of them-
`selves.
`
`It is herein to be noted that even if the reticle 118 is merely
`plain glass, as in most cases it is, it still exhibits some degree
`of reflectivity, which reflectivity gives rise to the retrore-
`flected rays 128R and 129R.
`It is herein also to be noted that incident rays passing
`through the telescope to the eye of the observer are also
`retroreflected by the eye of the observer. Thus, there is in
`effect,
`two retroreflective optical systems and thus two
`retroreflective signals.
`FIG. 9 is an optical schematic representation of one half
`of a binocular and comprises an objective lens 132, a first
`porro prism 134, a second porro prism 136, a reticle 138, a
`field lens 140, and an eyelens 142. When a ray such as 144
`is incident on the objective lens 132, it is focused thereby on
`the reticle 138, after passing through the porro prisms 134
`and 136. It is herein to be noted that although the ray 144 is
`directed along a path which is not straight; i.e., there are
`several right angle bends therein, the entire path is still part
`of the focal path of the instrument. Thus, the ray 144 is
`focused on the reticle 138, causing the same to be retrore-
`flected as ray 144R which then goes through a path similar
`to that of ray 144 and emerges from the objective lens 132
`in a direction which is opposite and parallel to that of the
`incident ray 144. It is to be noted that the description herein
`above describing a single ray is for purposes of simplicity of
`explanation.
`FIG. 10 is an optical schematic representation of a peri-
`scope. The periscope includes a window 146, an objective
`prism 148, an objective lens 149, an amici prism 150, an
`erecting prism assembly 152, a reticle 154, a field lens 156,
`an eyelens 158, and a filter 160. An incident ray 162 enters
`the periscope through the window 146, then passes through
`the prism 148, objective lens 149, amici prism 150, and
`erecting prism assembly 152 to the reticle 154 whereon the
`incident ray is reflected and emerges from the periscope as
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`retroreflected ray 162R whose direction is opposite and
`parallel to the incident ray 162. Again it is to be noted that
`the description above describing a single ray is merely for
`the purpose of simplicity of explanation.
`FIG. 11 is an optical schematic representation of a cam-
`era. The camera includes a lens 164, a shutter 166, and film
`168. In the operation of the camera when a picture is taken
`the shutter opens and incident rays 170 and 171 are focused
`on the film 168 through an aperture 172 in the shutter, by
`means of the lens 164. These rays are then reflected by the
`film and emerge from the lens as retroreflected rays 170R
`and 171R.
`
`It is to be noted that most, if not all, optical systems will
`have a reflecting surface such as a reticle, a lens, or a prism
`in the focal plane, and the incident radiation will be retrore-
`flected by any such surface.
`Referring now to FIG. 12, there is shown one embodiment
`of a system for detecting the presence of an optical
`instrument, for tracking said instrument, and for neutralizing
`observers utilizing said instrument and/or rendering the
`instrument ineffective.
`
`The system includes a scanner 180, including an optical
`searching means 182, such as a source of infrared light, a
`detector 184, and a laser 186. It is herein to be noted that the
`search means 182 and the detector 184 may be combined in
`the form of a transceiver as described hereinbefore in
`
`conjunction with FIGS. 7, 7a, and 7b. The scanner 182 is
`controlled by a scanning and positioning means 188, which
`includes a servo motor (not shown.) The scanning and
`positioning means 188 is powered by a power and control
`means 190, which means also supplies power for the scanner
`180, and a utilization system 192.
`In the operation of the system, the scanner 180 is caused
`to scan a preselected area by means of the scanning and
`positioning means 188, the means 188 being programmed
`by the utilization system 192. The optical searching means
`emits rays 194 and 195, when these rays impinge upon an
`optical
`instrument 196 exhibiting retroreflective
`characteristics, as hereinbefore described, they are retrore-
`flected as retroreflected rays 194R and 195R respectively,
`and detected by the detector 184 and the detector output is
`then fed to the utilization system 192. The utilization system
`may be programmed to merely track the instrument 196, in
`which case, this information would be fed to the scanning
`and positioning means 188 and thence to the scanner 180
`causing it to track said instrument. However, if it is desired
`to neutralize the observer using the instrument, or to render
`the instrument ineffective, then the utilization system 192
`will feed a signal to the laser 186 activating the same and
`causing a high intensity laser beam to be directed at the
`instrument,
`thereby accomplishing the aforementioned
`objects.
`It is herein to be noted that although the present system
`has been described as employing a laser, it is also possible
`to use any other high energy system, weapon, or weapon
`system.
`it will be readily apparent to
`With the present system,
`those skilled in the art, that a hostile satellite orbiting the
`earth and employing optical surveillance equipment
`to
`monitor a country’s activities can be detected and its sur-
`veillance capability destroyed.
`It is herein again to be noted that the aberrations in almost
`all optical
`instruments cause a small divergence of the
`retroreflected rays,
`the amount of said divergence being
`governed by the resolution of the retroreflector. As a prac-
`tical matter the angular resolution of optical systems such as
`binoculars, periscopes, telescopes, cameras, and optical sys-
`
`

`

`US 6,603,134 B1
`
`9
`
`tems carried by missiles will be between about 10'3 and
`10'5 radians which produce retroreflected beams of 10'6 to
`10'10 steradians. At a range of 1,000 feet the area of these
`beams would be 1.0 and 10'4 ft2 respectively. This diver-
`gence is so small so that the retroreflected rays are substan-
`tially collimated.
`It is herein to be noted that in microwave application
`corner reflectors have been utilized for retroreflecting pur-
`poses. However, the present invention enables the detection
`of microwave apparatus, such as antennas and the like which
`do not have a corner reflector as an integral part thereof, by
`utilizing the inherent retroreflection characteristics of the
`apparatus as hereinbefore discussed. Thus, this apparatus
`and systems eXhibiting the retroreflection phenomenon can
`be similarly detected by the use of radio frequency,
`microwave, X-ray, acoustical or any similar types of energy
`directed thereat.
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket