`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAILED: March 20, 2014
`____________________________________________________
`IN RE:
`Panasonic Corporation
`____________________________________________________
`SERIAL NO. 79122414
`____________________________________________________
`APPEAL RECEIVED: 03/20/2014
`____________________________________________________
`BRIEF DUE: n/a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nancy Dwyer Chapman
`Lackenbach Siegel LLP
`1 Chase Rd.Lackenbach Siegel Bldg.
`Scarsdale NY 10583-4156
`
`
`
`ESTTA593767
`
`
`The appeal and appeal fee in the above-entitled
`
`application were received on the date indicated above.
`
`Applicant has checked the request for reconsideration box
`
`on the ESTTA form, thereby indicating that it has filed or
`
`is filing today a request for reconsideration of the final
`
`refusal to register. Applicant should notify the Board
`
`immediately if it has not filed a timely request for
`
`reconsideration and does not intend to do so.
`
`A request for reconsideration, which may or may not
`
`include an amendment, must be filed with the Trademark
`
`
`
`Examining Operation, and may be filed via TEAS, using the
`
`Response to Office Action form.1
`
`In view of the filing of the request for
`
`reconsideration/amendment, the appeal is hereby instituted,
`
`but action on the appeal is suspended and the application
`
`is remanded to the examining attorney to consider the
`
`request for reconsideration/amendment.
`
`If registrability is found on the basis of the request
`
`for reconsideration/amendment, the appeal will be moot. In
`
`the event the refusal of registration is maintained, and
`
`assuming that the request for reconsideration/amendment
`
`does not raise a new issue, the application will be
`
`returned to the Board, proceedings in the appeal will be
`
`resumed, and applicant will be allowed time in which to
`
`file an appeal brief. If the request for
`
`reconsideration/amendment raises a new issue, the examining
`
`attorney may not issue a final refusal until the applicant
`
`has been given an opportunity to respond. Upon issuance of
`
`a final refusal, proceedings in the appeal will be resumed,
`
`and applicant will be allowed time in which to file an
`
`appeal brief. An Amendment to Allege Use will be treated
`
`in the same manner as any amendment; if registrability is
`
`
`1 (To maintain their status, TEAS Plus applicants must use TEAS
`for filing a request for reconsideration.)
`
`2
`
`
`
`found on the basis of the AAU, the appeal will be moot; if
`
`the AAU raises a new issue, the examining attorney may not
`
`make a refusal final until applicant has been given an
`
`opportunity to respond.
`
`Request to Divide
`
`If, in addition to filing a notice of appeal and
`
`request for reconsideration/amendment, applicant has also
`
`filed a request to divide the application, the appeal is
`
`instituted, proceedings are suspended, and the application
`
`is remanded to the examining attorney. The examining
`
`attorney should forward the application to the
`
`ITU/Divisional Unit of the Office to act on the request to
`
`divide. After the request to divide is processed, the
`
`examining attorney should consider the request for
`
`reconsideration/amendment. If registrability is found on
`
`the basis of the request for reconsideration/amendment, the
`
`appeal will be moot. If the refusal of registration is
`
`maintained,2 the divided file containing classes for which
`
`an appeal has been filed should be returned to the Board,
`
`and the Board will then resume proceedings in the appeal
`
`and allow applicant time to file an appeal brief. The file
`
`for which no appeal has been taken should be treated by the
`
`3
`
`
`
`examining attorney in the same manner as any request for
`
`reconsideration/amendment where there has been no appeal.
`
`
`2 If the request for reconsideration/amendment raises a new
`issue, a final Office action may not issue until the applicant
`has had an opportunity to respond).
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
