throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA578806
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`12/26/2013
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`Granted to Date
`of previous
`extension
`Address
`
`CRAMBO, S.A.
`01/01/2014
`
`AVDA. DEL SOL, 11
`MADRID (TORREJON DE ARDOZ), E-28850
`SPAIN
`
`Attorney
`information
`
`Stewart J. Bellus
`COLLARD AND ROE
`1077 NORTHERN BLVD
`ROSLYN, NY 11576
`UNITED STATES
`sbellus@collardroe.com Phone:5163659802
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`International
`Registration No.
`Applicant
`
`85699385
`12/26/2013
`
`NONE
`
`Publication date
`Opposition
`Period Ends
`International
`Registration Date
`
`09/03/2013
`01/01/2014
`
`NONE
`
`Panasonic Corporation
`1006 Oaza Kadoma, Kadoma-shi
`Osaka, JPX 571-8501
`JPX
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 009. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Feature of a television set, namely, a
`setting or mode of a television wherein power is conserved thereby allowing the television to operate
`more efficiently
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`Dilution
`
`Trademark Act section 2(d)
`Trademark Act section 43(c)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Registration
`No.
`Registration Date
`
`3639928
`
`06/16/2009
`
`Application Date
`
`11/12/2008
`
`Foreign Priority
`
`05/14/2008
`
`

`
`Word Mark
`Design Mark
`
`ECONAV
`
`Date
`
`Description of
`Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Class 009. First use: First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`GPS navigation devices; software programs for use with browsers, interactive
`driving guides, maps, mobile phones and with telecommunication devices
`
`Attachments
`
`79062525#TMSN.jpeg( bytes )
`econav- opposition.pdf(659902 bytes )
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/sjb/
`Stewart J. Bellus
`12/26/2013
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`..................................................................... --X
`
`Opposition No.
`Serial No. 85/699,385
`
`) )
`
`) ) )
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`CRAMBO, S A
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION
`
`Applicant.
`
`..................................................................... __X
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`In the matter of an application for registration of the trademark ECONAVI for goods in
`
`Class 9, filed on August 9, 2012 under Serial No. 85/699385 by PANASONIC
`
`CORPORATION (“Applicant”), CRAMBO, S.A. (“Opposer”) believes it will be damaged by
`
`registration of said application and opposes same. The grounds for opposition are as follows:
`
`(BACKGROUND)
`
`1.
`
`Opposer is a Sociedad Anornina organized under the laws of Spain, and located at Avda.
`
`Del Sol, 11E, Torrejon de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain, 28850.
`
`2.
`
`Opposer’s mark ECONAV (Registration No. 3,639,928) was registered by the U.S.
`
`Patent and Trademark Office on June 16, 2009.
`
`

`
`3.
`
`Application Serial No.85/699,3 85 was filed on August 9, 2012, based on a future
`
`intention to use and a foreign registration, which means that August 9, 2012 is the earliest date
`
`upon which Applicant can rely as its “first use date.”
`
`4.
`
`Opposer’s rights in its ECONAV mark date back to the May 14, 2008 priority claim
`
`in its International Registration which is the basis of its US application/registration, or if that
`
`date is not allowed, the November 12, 2008 filing date of its US application. Both of these dates
`
`are long before Applicant’s effective “first use date” of August 9, 2012, so Opposer has prior
`
`rights in the United States.
`
`Count I {Likelihood of Confusion!
`
`5.
`
`Opposer incorporates by reference all the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-4 of this
`
`Notice of Opposition.
`
`6.
`
`The commercial impression of Applicant’s mark ECONAVI is nearly identical to
`
`Opposer’s ECONAV mark, the only difference being the extra letter “I” at the end of
`
`Applicant’s mark.
`
`

`
`7.
`
`Applicant’s goods, as described in Application Serial Number 85/699,385, are
`
`closely related to goods described in Opposer’s ECONAV Registration.
`
`8.
`
`Due to similarities between Opposer’s and Applicant’s marks and the closely related
`
`goods upon which those marks are used, there is a likelihood that consumers will be confused,
`
`mistaken and/or deceived into believing that Applicant’s goods emanate from, or in some way
`
`are associated or connected with, or sponsored, authorized or warranted by Opposer, all to the
`
`detriment of Opposer, and Opposer will be damaged if a registration is granted to Applicant.
`
`Count II {Dilution by Blurring)
`
`9.
`
`Opposer incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-8 of this
`
`Notice of Opposition.
`
`10.
`
`Opposer is the owner of the ECONAV mark which is famous and distinctive throughout
`
`the United States. Oppose1"s ECONAV mark has been registered in the United States since
`
`June 16, 2009, and Opposer’s rights date back to the November 12, 2008 filing date of its
`
`application. Opposer’s ECONAV mark has been used and advertised extensively, and is widely
`
`recognized by consumers and those in the trade as a designation of source for the goods of
`
`Opposer and is therefore a famous and distinctive mark.
`
`

`
`ll.
`
`Applicant’s use of its ECONAVI mark is in violation of Section 43(0) of the Lanham Act
`
`in that Applicant is likely to cause dilution by blurring by creating a likelihood of association
`
`with Opposer’s ECONAV mark.
`
`12.
`
`App1icant’s use of the ECONAVI mark will cause an association arising from the
`
`similarity with Opposer’s ECONAV mark that will cause dilution by blurring and impair the
`
`distinctiveness of Opposer’s mark, all to the detriment of Opposer who will be damaged by
`
`Applicant’s use of the OMIERA mark.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer requests that this opposition be sustained and that the requested
`
`registration of App1icant’s mark in Application Serial Number 85/699,3 85 be denied.
`
`CRAMBO, S.A.
`
`
`
`Sara M. Dorchak
`
`COLLARD & ROE, P.C.
`1077 Northern Boulevard
`
`Roslyn, New York 11576
`Telephone: (516) 365-9802
`Facsimile: (516) 365-9805
`Email: sbellus@co1lardroe.com
`akaplan@collardroe.com
`
`Attorneys for Opposer CRAMBO S.A.
`
`Date: December 26 2013
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the forgoing NOTICE OF
`
`OPPOSITION has this 26th day of December 2013 been sent by prepaid First Class Mail to:
`
`Geoffrey D. Aurini
`Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
`5445 Corporate Dr Ste 200
`Troy, Michigan 48098-2683
`
`Meigz €~
`
`Stewart J.
`
`ellus
`
`1‘:\u5crsEb::|Ius\0pposi|ions\NnLicc oJ'0;:po:iIjou. (ECDNAVI--LDC wpd

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket