`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`CARNITION LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-1475
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Carnition LLC (“Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this
`
`Original Complaint against Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant”) as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement of United States Patent No. 7,428,707 (“the
`
`‘707 patent”) entitled “Customizable Web Site Access System and Method Therefore”. A true
`
`and correct copy of the ‘707 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Plaintiff is the owner by
`
`assignment of the ‘707 patent. Plaintiff seeks monetary damages.
`
`PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`State of Texas. Plaintiff maintains its principal place of business at 8992 Preston Road, Suite 110-
`
`245, Frisco, Texas 75034.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 1 Infinite Loop,
`
`Cupertino, California 95014. Defendant can be served with process through its registered agent
`
`CT Corporation System, 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-01475-JRG Document 1 Filed 09/03/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
`
`4.
`
`This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.,
`
`including 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction
`
`over this case for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`5.
`
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because: Defendant is present
`
`within or has minimum contacts within the State of Texas and the Eastern District of Texas;
`
`Defendant has purposefully availed itself of the privileges of conducting business in the State of
`
`Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas; Defendant has sought protection and benefit from the
`
`laws of the State of Texas; Defendant regularly conducts business within the State of Texas and
`
`within the Eastern District of Texas; and Plaintiff’s cause of action arises directly from
`
`Defendant’s business contacts and other activities in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District
`
`of Texas.
`
`6. More specifically, Defendant, directly and/or through intermediaries, ships,
`
`distributes, uses, offers for sale, sells, and/or advertises products and services in the United States,
`
`the State of Texas, and the Eastern District of Texas including but not limited to the infringing
`
`products and services as detailed below. Upon information and belief, Defendant has committed
`
`patent infringement in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas. Defendant solicits
`
`and has solicited customers in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas. Defendant
`
`has paying customers who are residents of the State of Texas and the Eastern District of Texas and
`
`who each use and have used the Defendants’ products and/or services in the State of Texas and in
`
`the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and
`
`1400(b). On information and belief, Defendant has transacted business in this district, and has
`
`directly committed acts of patent infringement in this district.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-01475-JRG Document 1 Filed 09/03/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
`
`COUNT I – PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff refers to and incorporates herein the allegations of Paragraphs 1-7 above.
`
`The ‘707 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office on September 23, 2008 after full and fair examination. Plaintiff is the owner by
`
`assignment of the ‘707 patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the ‘707 patent, including
`
`the exclusive right to sue for infringement and recover past damages.
`
`10.
`
`Defendant owns, uses, operates, advertises, controls, sells, and otherwise provides
`
`products and/or services that infringe the ‘707 patent. The ‘707 patent provides, among other
`
`things, “A computer-implemented auto-composing web site access system, comprising: a
`
`composer, wherein said computer composes a web slide show presentation through automatic
`
`extraction of web page details from a desired web page, wherein said web page details include one
`
`or more of the following: a plurality of hyperlinks found within the desired web page that provides
`
`a plurality of URLs, a presentation/rendition text file within the desired web page that provides a
`
`plurality of URLs, a meta tag within the desired web page that provides a plurality of URLs; and
`
`a performer, wherein said performer displays said web slide show presentation in order of the
`
`plurality or URLs provided by the extracted web page details.”
`
`11.
`
`Defendant directly and/or through intermediaries, made, has made, used, imported,
`
`provided, supplied, distributed, sold, and/or offered for sale products and/or services that infringed
`
`one or more claims of the ‘707 patent in this district and elsewhere in the United States.
`
`Particularly, the Apple MacBook proposal presentation system on Defendant’s website,
`
`www.apple.com, utilizes a composer to automatically extract webpage details. By making, using,
`
`importing, offering for sale, and/or selling such products and services, and all like products and
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-01475-JRG Document 1 Filed 09/03/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
`
`services, Defendant has injured Plaintiff and is thus liable for infringement of the ‘707 patent
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`12.
`
`Defendant’s aforesaid activities have been without authority and/or license from
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`13.
`
`In addition to what is required for pleadings under Form 18 for direct infringement
`
`in patent cases, and to the extent any marking was required by 35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff and all
`
`predecessors in interest to the ‘707 Patent complied with all marking requirements under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287.
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained by Plaintiff as
`
`a result of the Defendant’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law,
`
`cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court find in its favor and against Defendant, and
`
`that the Court grant Plaintiff the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`An adjudication that one or more claims of the ‘707 patent have been infringed,
`
`
`
`either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by Defendant;
`
`B.
`
`An award to Plaintiff of damages adequate to compensate Plaintiff for the
`
`Defendant’s acts of infringement together with pre-judgment and post-judgment
`
`interest;
`
`C.
`
`Any further relief that this Court deems just and proper.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-01475-JRG Document 1 Filed 09/03/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`Dated: September 3, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Austin Hansley
`AUSTIN HANSLEY P.L.L.C.
`Austin Hansley
`
`
`Texas Bar No.: 24073081
`Brandon LaPray
`Texas Bar No.: 24087888
`5050 Quorum Dr. Suite 700
`
`Dallas, Texas 75254
`
`Telephone:
`(469) 587-9776
`Facsimile:
`(855) 347-6329
`Email: Austin@TheTexasLawOffice.com
`Email: Brandon@TheTexasLawOffice.com
`www.TheTexasLawOffice.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`CARNITION LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`