Case 2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP Document 72 Filed 10/15/23 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1447
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DELL INC.,
`
`Defendant,
`
`and
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP
`
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF PRESERVATION OF OBJECTIONS ON THE RECORD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP Document 72 Filed 10/15/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 1448
`
`
`
`Defendants Intel Corporation and Dell Inc. file this notice to preserve their objections to
`
`the following of Plaintiff’s exhibits that were pre-admitted: PTX-024; PTX-025; PTX-026;
`
`PTX-027; PTX-028; PTX-029; PTX-030; PTX-051; PTX-053; PTX-054; PTX-055; PTX-056;
`
`PTX-057; PTX-058; PTX-061; PTX-062; PTX-065; PTX-066; PTX-101; PTX-102; PTX-103;
`
`PTX-104; PTX-105; PTX-126; PTX-245; PTX-246; PTX-247; PTX-249; PTX-250; PTX-251;
`
`PTX-252; and PTX-253.1
`
`Exhibits Basis for Objection
`
`Defendants object to the admission of these exhibits on the basis that these
`license agreements are not comparable, irrelevant, and unduly prejudicial.
`Defendants incorporate by reference the arguments set forth in 2:16-cv-00693
`Dkts. 631, 719, 648, 742, 860; 2:16-cv-00695 Dkts. 66, 67.
`Defendants object to the admission of these exhibits on the basis that they are
`licenses that both parties agree are not comparable, irrelevant, and unduly
`prejudicial, and neither side’s expert alleges or establishes comparability of these
`licenses. Defendants incorporate by reference the arguments set forth in 2:16-cv-
`00693 Dkt. 797 at MIL No. 10. For PTX-058 and PTX-066, Defendants do not
`object to the entire document, but only to the document in unredacted form that
`references certain payments that are not established to be comparable to the
`hypothetical negotiation.
`Defendants object to the admission of these exhibits on the basis that they are
`licenses (or summary documents that refer to licenses) that are not comparable,
`irrelevant, unduly prejudicial, and untimely produced. Defendants incorporate by
`reference the arguments set forth in 2:16-cv-00693 Dkts. 837; 860
`Defendants object to the admission of these exhibits on the basis that these
`documents are irrelevant and more prejudicial than probative, to the extent they
`equate Dell’s knowledge of Alacritech, with knowledge of the patents-in-suit or
`knowledge of infringement or risk of infringement. Defendants incorporate by
`reference the arguments set forth in 2:16-cv-00693 Dkts. 604; 654.
`
`Defendants object to the admission of these exhibits on the basis that they contain
`are irrelevant and unduly prejudicial, including because they contain un-
`apportioned revenues. Defendants incorporate by reference the arguments set
`forth in 2:16-cv-00693 Dkt. 797 at MIL No. 3; Dkts. 631, 719, 648, 742, 860;
`2:16-cv-00695 Dkts. 66, 67.
`
`PTX-051,
`PTX-061,
`PTX-062,
`PTX-065
`PTX-053,
`PTX-054,
`PTX-055,
`PTX-056,
`PTX-057,
`PTX-058,
`PTX-066
`
`PTX-245,
`PTX-246,
`PTX-249
`
`PTX-101,
`PTX-102,
`PTX-103,
`PTX-104,
`PTX-105,
`PTX-126
`PTX-024,
`PTX-025,
`PTX-026,
`PTX-027,
`PTX-028,
`PTX-029,
`PTX-030,
`
`
`1 Defendants also preserve all objections stated on the record at the September 28 and October
`10, 2023 Pre-Trial Conferences and in prior and subsequent briefing.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP Document 72 Filed 10/15/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 1449
`
`
`
`
`
`PTX-247,
`PTX-250,
`PTX-251,
`PTX-252,
`PTX-253
`
`Defendants understand that their objections to the aforementioned exhibits were
`
`overruled in the Court’s rulings on Defendant’s Motions in Limine (Dkts. 797, 814), Motions to
`
`Exclude (Dkts. 631, 719, 648, 742, 860, 885), and/or rulings at the September 28 and October
`
`11, 2023 Pretrial Conferences.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP Document 72 Filed 10/15/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 1450
`
`Dated: October 15, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` s/ Taylor Gooch
`Taylor Gooch (Pro Hac Vice)
`California Bar #294282
`Taylor.Gooch@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`DORR LLP
`One Front Street, Suite 3500
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: (628) 235 1000
`Fax: (628) 235-1001
`
`
`Sonal N. Mehta (Pro Hac Vice)
`California Bar # 222086
`Sonal.Mehta@wilmerhale.com
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Tel: (650) 858-6000
`Fax: (650) 858-6100
`
`
`Joseph J. Mueller (Pro Hac Vice)
`Massachusetts Bar # 647567
`Joseph.Mueller@wilmerhale.com
`Richard O’Neill (Pro Hac Vice)
`Massachusetts Bar # 638170
`Richard.O’Neill@wilmerhale.com
`Kate Saxton (Pro Hac Vice)
`Massachusetts Bar # 655903
`Kate.Saxton@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`DORR LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Tel: (617) 526-6000
`Fax: (617) 526-5000
`
`
`Harry L. Gillam, Jr. (07921800)
`Gillam & Smith LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903) 934-9257
`gil@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP Document 72 Filed 10/15/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 1451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David Folsom
`FOLSOM ADR PLLC
`6002-B Summerfield Drive
`Texarkana, TX 75503
`Telephone: (903) 277-7303
`david@folsomadr.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Intervenor Intel Corporation
`
`/s/ Emily Chambers Welch
`Michael J. Newton (TX Bar No. 24003844)
`ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
`1950 University Avenue
`5th Floor
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303
`Phone: (650) 838-2000
`Fax: (650) 838-2001
`mike.newton@alston.com
`
`
`Brady Cox (TX Bar No. 24074084)
`ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
`2828 North Harwood Street, 18th Floor
`Dallas, Texas 75201-2139
`Tel: (214) 922-3400
`Fax: (214) 922-3899
`brady.cox@alston.com
`
`
`Deron R Dacus (TX Bar No. 00790553)
`THE DACUS FIRM, PC
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas 75701
`(903) 705-1117
`(903) 581-2543 Fax
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`
`Kirk T. Bradley (NC Bar No. 26490)
`ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
`Bank of America Plaza
`101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28280-4000
`Tel: (704) 444-1000
`Fax: (704) 444-1111
`kirk.bradley@alston.com
`
`
`Emily Chambers Welch
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP Document 72 Filed 10/15/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 1452
`
`Alston & Bird LLP - Atlanta
`One Atlantic Center
`1201 West Peachtree Street
`Atlanta, GA 30309-3424
`404.881.7000
`Fax: 404.881.7777
`emily.welch@alston.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Dell, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00695-RWS-RSP Document 72 Filed 10/15/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 1453
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on October 15, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system and electronic mail per Local Rule
`
`CV-5(a)(3).
`
`/s/ Taylor Gooch
`
`
`
`
`
`
`