`
`FORM 32. Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts
`
`Form 32
`July 2020
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO ADVISE OF SCHEDULING CONFLICTS
`
`Case Number:
`
`Short Case Caption:
`
`2022-1595
`Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
`
`Sandoz, Inc., Lek Pharmaceuticals D.D.
`William M. Jay
`10/05/2022
`10/06/2022
`03/10/2023
`
`Party Name(s)
`Name of Arguing Counsel
`Dates Unavailable
`
`List up to ten dates of
`unavailability within the specific
`sessions identified by the court in
`the Notice to Advise of Scheduling
`Conflicts in this case.
`
`Attach a statement showing
`good cause for each listed
`date. Dates listed without a
`supporting statement will not be
`considered in scheduling
`argument. See Fed. Cir. R. 34(d);
`Practice Notes to Rule 34.
`Potential Other Conflicts
`
`Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Incyte
`Corporation, No. 19-2011.
`
`Please list other pending cases
`before this court in which above
`counsel intends to argue
`(regardless of case status).
`I certify the above information and any attached statement is complete and
`accurate. I further certify that I will update my notice should new conflicts arise
`or existing conflicts change.
`
`07/20/2022
`Date: _________________
`
`Signature:
`
`Name:
`
`/s/ William M. Jay
`William M. Jay
`
`
`
`Case: 22-1595 Document: 36 Page: 2 Filed: 07/20/2022
`
`STATEMENT OF GOOD CAUSE
`I will argue for Appellees and have good cause for requesting that the Court
`
`not schedule oral argument on the following dates:
`
`October 5-6, 2022: I will be observing Yom Kippur.
`
`March 10, 2023: I will be participating in a parent-teacher conference.
`
`Appellees respectfully request that the Court not schedule argument for these
`
`dates.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on July(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`/s/ (cid:58)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:45)(cid:68)(cid:92)
`William M. Jay
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
