`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313- 1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`11/ 126,351
`
`05/11/2005
`
`Hidenori Shimizu
`
`P27872
`
`3224
`
`7055
`7590
`06/02/2009
`GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.
`1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACE
`RESTON, VA 20191
`
`EXAMINER
`CHUKWURAH, NATHANIEL c
`
`ART UNIT
`
`3721
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`
`
`
`
` NOT *ICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`06/02/2009
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`gbpatent @ gbpatentcom
`pto @ gbpatent. com
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
`
`AND INTERFERENCES
`
`Ex parte.‘ HIDENORI SHIMIZU, TOSHIHARU OHASHI, KOZO KAWAI,
`YOSHINORI SAINOMOTO, FUMIAKI SAWANO, HIROSHI
`
`MIYAZAKI, TADASHI ARIMURA and TATSUHIKO MATSUMOTO
`
`Application No. 11/126,351
`Technology Center 3700
`
`Mailed: June 1, 2009
`
`Before ERIC W. HAWTHORNE, Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`
`HAWTHORNE, Supervisory Paralegal Specialist.
`
`ORDER RETURNING UNDOCKETED APPEAL TO EXAMINER
`
`This application was electronically received by the Board of Patent
`
`Appeals and Interferences on February 23, 2009. A review of the
`
`application revealed that it is not ready for docketing as an appeal.
`
`Accordingly, the application is herewith being returned to the Examiner to
`
`address the following matter(s) requiring attention prior to docketing.
`
`
`
`Application 11/ 126,351
`
`EXAMINER’S CONSIDERATION OF REPLY BRIEF
`
`A Reply Brief was filed in this application on November 25, 2008.
`
`There is no evidence on the record indicating that the Examiner has
`
`considered the Reply Brief in accordance With 37 CFR § 41 .43(a)(1) and
`
`MPEP § 1208, part II. The document entered in the file as a Reply Brief
`
`Noted on February 24, 2009 does not refer to the Reply Brief but is rather a
`
`notification regarding the Sanders patent. Correction is required.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the application is returned to the Examiner:
`
`1)
`
`to consider the Reply Brief filed November 25, 2008 as indicated
`
`above and;
`
`2) for such further action as may be appropriate.
`
`If there are any questions pertaining to this Order, please contact the
`
`Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences at 57 1-272-9797 .
`
`EWH/nhl
`
`GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C.
`1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACE
`
`RESTON VA 20191
`
`