throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
` FILING DATE
`
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`CONFIRMATIONNO.
`
`
`12/237,434
`
`09/25/2008
`
`Yasuyuki Mishima
`
`1497.49202X00
`
`9794
`
`20457
`
`7590
`
`02/20/2014
`
`ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP
`1300 NORTH SEVENTEENTH STREET
`SUITE 1800
`ARLINGTON,VA 22209-3873
`
`CRAWLEY, KEITH L
`
`2696
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`02/20/2014
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Status
`1)X] Responsive to communication(s)filed on 12/16/13.
`LJ A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiledon__
`2a)X] This action is FINAL.
`2b)L] This action is non-final.
`3)L] Anelection was made bythe applicant in responsetoarestriction requirementset forth during the interview on
`
`___} the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)[] Since this application is in condition for allowance exceptfor formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5) Claim(s) 1-10 and 12 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`6)L] Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`7) Claim(s) 1-10 and 12 is/are rejected.
`8)L] Claim(s)____is/are objectedto.
`
`9)L] Claim(s)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`nito/www. uspte.gov/natenis/init events/poh/index.isp
`
`or send an inquiry to PPHieedback@uspte.aov.
`
`Application Papers
`10)L] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11)L] The drawing(s)filed on
`is/are: a)L_] accepted or b)L_] objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)[] Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`a)L] All
`b)[-] Some** c)L] None ofthe:
`1..] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.L] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.L] Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`““ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 12/237,434 MISHIMA ET AL.
`
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`AIA (First Inventorto File)
`Office Action Summary
`
`2696KEITH CRAWLEY Na
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Anyreply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed
`
`Attachment(s)
`3) CT] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) X Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date.
`:
`.
`4) Ol Other:
`2) CT] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20140212
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 2
`
`1.
`
`The present application is being examined underthe pre-AlA first to invent
`
`provisions.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`2.
`
`The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis
`
`for all obviousnessrejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described
`as set forth in section 102 of thistitle, if the differences between the subject matter sought to
`be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been
`obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which
`said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the
`invention was made.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1-5, 7 and 8 are rejected underpre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Nishikawa (WO 2006/095684) in view of Applicant's Admitted Prior
`
`Art (AAPA) and Chang et al. (US 2008/0068342). Please note: Nishikawa (US
`
`2008/0136788) will be used as an English translation of WO 2006/095684.
`
`Regarding independent claim 1, Nishikawa discloses a display device
`
`comprising a touch panel and a display panel, the touch panel being mounted on a
`
`display panel (Nishikawa: FIG. 1A, paras. 51 and 70; touch panel4, display panel 60.),
`
`wherein;
`
`the touch panel includes an uppertransparent-electrode-attached film and a
`
`lower transparent-electrode-attachedfilm (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 52; upper
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 3
`
`transparent-electrode-attachedfilm 1 and a lower transparent-electrode-attached film
`
`2.),
`
`a gap is formed between the uppertransparent-electrode-attached film and the
`
`lower transparent-electrode-attachedfilm (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 76; gap 19.),
`
`the touch panel is adhered to a display region of the display panel (Nishikawa:
`
`fig. 9A, § 93-95, touch panel 4 adhered to display region of display panel 60 via
`
`adhesive 7; see also ¥ 72),
`
`and an air hole is formed in the lower transparent-electrode-attachedfilm of the
`
`touch panel, said air hole being formed to face outside of the display panel in a plan
`
`view (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 79 air holes 121; see also fig. 10 and { 95).
`
`Nishikawafails to disclose adhering using UV curing resin.
`
`AAPAteachesadhering using UV curing resin (AAPA,instant Application, figs.
`
`11-12, | 7-10, UV curing resin 9 is provided to adhere touch panel 23 to display 24).
`
`Nishikawa and AAPAare both directed to display devices having a touch panel.
`
`Nishikawa discloses a device which differs from the claimed invention by the
`
`substitution of a general adhesivelayer for a UV curing resin. AAPA teaches the
`
`substituted element of a UV curing resin andits function is well knownin the art for
`
`adhering a touch panel to a display panel. The general adhesive of Nishikawa could
`
`have been substituted with the UV curing resin of AAPA andthe results would have
`
`been predictable and resulted in adhering a touch panel to a display panel with a UV
`
`curing resin. Therefore, the claimed subject matter would have been obvious to a
`
`person having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 4
`
`Nishikawafails to disclose an air hole being formedto be outside of the UV
`
`curing resin and outside of the display region of the display panelin the plan view.
`
`Chang teaches anair hole being formed to be outside of the UV curing resin and
`
`outside of the display region of the display panelin the plan view (figs. 5-6, { 74,
`
`portions of the adhesive part 451 are removed to form airing portions 455 disposed in a
`
`peripheral area PA; see also { 46).
`
`Nishikawa and Changare both directed to display devices having a touch panel.
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ofordinary skill in the art at the time the
`
`invention was madeto combinethe device of Nishikawa with the peripheral air holes of
`
`Chang since such a modification provides dynamic stability of the touch panel so that
`
`the touch maybeeasily restored to its former state (Chang, § 59) and prevents a
`
`display error (Chang, abstract).
`
`Regarding claim 2, Nishikawa discloses a light blocking film is formed outside a
`
`display region of the touch panel so as to coverthe air hole with the light blocking film.
`
`(Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; paras. 66, 67; light blocking film 5c.)
`
`Regarding claim 3, Nishikawa discloses a plurality of air holes is formed in the
`
`lower transparent-electrode-attachedfilm facing outside of the display panelin the plan
`
`view (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 79 air holes 121; see also fig. 10 and { 95).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 5
`
`Chang further teachesa plurality of air holes are formedto be outside of the
`
`display region of the display panelin the plan view (figs. 1-3, airing portions 55, see
`
`51-59, airing portions disposed in a peripheral area PA; see also { 46).
`
`Regarding claim 4, Nishikawadiscloses air holes 122 of FIG. 1B are formed at
`
`outer edgesof the touch panel near components 9 forming the edge of the display "on a
`
`side where no connection terminal is formed”. (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 73 and 77;
`
`see also fig. 10 and § 95).
`
`Nishikawafails to disclose details of the display panel 60 of FIG. 1B and
`
`therefore fails to disclose a flexible printed circuit board is mounted on a TFT substrate
`
`of the display panel andthat the air hole is formedin a short side of the touch panel.
`
`However AAPAteachesto improve a display device having a touch panel
`
`mounted on a display panel by providing a flexible printed circuit board is mounted on a
`
`TFT substrate of the display panel and the touch panel includes a_ short side of the
`
`touch panel (AAPA: FIG. 11. A flexible printed circuit board 2 is mounted on a TFT
`
`substrate 4 opposite a short side of display panel 23 that overhangs the TFT substrate
`
`for the purposesof providing transistors for controlling states of pixels of the display
`
`panel, providing means for conveying signals from external driver circuits to those
`
`transistors and providing non-transparent structural components 13 of the touch panel
`
`23 positioned outside the display, to avoid blocking the display.)
`
`It therefore would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time
`
`the invention was madeto adapt Nishikawa's display device to provide a flexible printed
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 6
`
`circuit board is mounted on a TFT substrate of the display panel andthatthe air hole is
`
`formed in a short side of the touch panel to achieve the predictable result of providing
`
`transistors for controlling states of pixels of the display panel, providing means for
`
`conveying signals from external driver circuits to those transistors and providing non-
`
`transparentstructural components of the touch panel positioned outside the display, to
`
`avoid blocking the display.
`
`Regarding claim 5, Nishikawa discloses the air hole is closed.
`
`(Nishikawa: FIG.
`
`1A: para. 78. The air hole 121 is closed with UV-curable resin 122.)
`
`Regarding claim 7, Nishikawa discloses the air hole is closed with a resin.
`
`(Nishikawa: FIG. 1A: para. 78. The air hole 121 is closed with UV-curable resin 122.)
`
`Regarding claim 8, Nishikawa discloses the display panel and the touch panel
`
`are arrangedin the inside of a mold the air hole formed in the lower transparent-
`
`electrode-attached film of the touch panelis closed with an adhesive layer which
`
`adheres the mold and the touch panel to each other. (Nishikawa: FlGs.1B and 6; paras
`
`84 and 85. An adhesiveresin layer 6, 122 adheres the touch panel to a mold 5a in
`
`which the touch panel 4 and display panel 60 reside and which closes air hole 121).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 7
`
`4.
`
`Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Nishikawa in view of AAPA and Chang as applied to claim 1 above, and furtherin view
`
`of Kawashima (US 2005/0106291).
`
`Regarding claim 6, Nishikawa discloses the air hole is closed with a resin.
`
`(Nishikawa: FIG. 1A: para. 78. The air hole 121 is closed with UV-curable resin 122.)
`
`Nishikawafails to disclose the air hole mayalternatively be closed with a sealing
`
`tape, rather than by resin.
`
`However Kawashima teachesthat it was knownto thoseofskill in the art of
`
`manufacturing devices having gasfilled spaces, that when providing a hole in the
`
`device to permit gas be introduced into an enclosed spacewithin the device to
`
`subsequently to provide sealing tape over the hole and any other apertures for the
`
`purposeof enclosing the spaceto prevent the gas from thereafter entering or leaving
`
`the space.
`
`(Kawashima: FIG. 9C; para. 105.)
`
`It therefore would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time
`
`the invention was madeto adapt Nishikawa's display device to provide the air hole may
`
`alternatively be closed with a sealing tape, rather than by resin to achieve the
`
`predictable result of preventing the air from thereafter entering or leaving the space
`
`within the touch panel.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 8
`
`5.
`
`Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Nishikawa in view of AAPA and Chang, and further in view of Mikoshiba (US
`
`6,689,458).
`
`Regarding independent claim 9 and claim 10, Nishikawa discloses a display
`
`device comprising a touch panel and a display panel, the touch panel being mounted on
`
`a display panel (Nishikawa: FIG. 1A, paras. 51 and 70; touch panel 4, display panel
`
`60), wherein
`
`the touch panelincludes an uppertransparent-electrode-attachedfilm and a
`
`lower transparent-electrode-attachedfilm (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 52; upper
`
`transparent-electrode-attachedfilm 1 and a lower transparent-electrode-attached film
`
`2),
`
`a gap is formed between the uppertransparent-electrode-attached film and the
`
`lower transparent-electrode-attachedfilm (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 76; gap 19.),
`
`the touch panel is adhered to a display region of the display panel (Nishikawa:
`
`fig. 9A, § 93-95, touch panel 4 adhered to display region of display panel 60 via
`
`adhesive 7; see also { 72),
`
`and an air hole is formed in the lower transparent-electrode-attachedfilm of the
`
`touch panel, said air hole being formedto face outside of the display panel in a plan
`
`view. (Nishikawa: FIG. 1B; para. 79 air hole 121; see also fig. 10 and § 95)
`
`Nishikawafails to disclose adhering using UV curing resin.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 9
`
`AAPAteachesadhering using UV curing resin (AAPA,instant Application, figs.
`
`11-12, | 7-10, UV curing resin 9 is provided to adhere touch panel 23 to display 24).
`
`Nishikawa and AAPAareboth directed to display devices having a touch panel.
`
`Nishikawa discloses a device which differs from the claimed invention by the
`
`substitution of a general adhesive layer for a UV curing resin. AAPA teaches the
`
`substituted element of a UV curing resin andits function is well knownin the art for
`
`adhering a touch panel to a display panel. The general adhesive of Nishikawa could
`
`have been substituted with the UV curing resin of AAPA andthe results would have
`
`been predictable and resulted in adhering a touch panel to a display panel with a UV
`
`curing resin. Therefore, the claimed subject matter would have been obvious to a
`
`person having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made.
`
`Nishikawafails to disclose an air hole being formedto be outside of the UV
`
`curing resin and outside of the display region of the display panelin the plan view.
`
`Chang teaches anair hole being formed to be outside of the UV curing resin and
`
`outside of the display region of the display panelin the plan view (figs. 5-6, { 74,
`
`portions of the adhesive part 451 are removedto form airing portions 455 disposed ina
`
`peripheral area PA; see also { 46).
`
`Nishikawa and Changare both directed to display devices having a touch panel.
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ofordinary skill in the art at the time the
`
`invention was made to combinethe device of Nishikawa with the peripheral air holes of
`
`Chang since such a modification provides dynamic stability of the touch panel so that
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 10
`
`the touch maybeeasily restored to its former state (Chang, § 59) and prevents a
`
`display error (Chang, abstract).
`
`Nishikawafails to disclose unevenness is formed on a surface of a transparent
`
`electrode formed on an inner side of the upper transparent-electrode-attachedfilm or on
`
`a surface of a transparent electrode formed on an inner side of the lower transparent-
`
`electrode-attachedfilm [claim 9], and the unevennessis formed on the surface of the
`
`transparent electrode formed on the inner side of the upper transparent-electrode-
`
`attached film and on the surface of the transparent electrode formed on the inner side of
`
`the lowertransparent-electrode-attachedfilm [claim 10].
`
`However Mikoshiba teaches to improve a touch panel having upper and lower
`
`transparent electrode by providing the unevenness is formed on the surface of the
`
`transparent electrode formed on the inner side of the upper transparent-electrode-
`
`attached film and on the surface of the transparent electrode formed on the inner side of
`
`the lower transparent-electrode-attached film for the purpose of suppressing
`
`interference fringes and reducing mutual adhesion.
`
`(Mikoshiba: col. 1, line 33 - col. 2,
`
`line 9 and col. 5, line 38 - col. 6, line 37.)
`
`Therefore it would have been obvious to one ofordinary skill in the art at the time
`
`the invention was madeto adapt Nishikawa's display device to provide the unevenness
`
`is formed on the surface of the transparent electrode formed on the inner side of the
`
`upper transparent-electrode-attached film and /or on the surface of the transparent
`
`electrode formed on the inner side of the lower transparent-electrode-attached film to
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 11
`
`achieve the predictable result of suppressing interference fringes and reducing mutual
`
`adhesion.
`
`6.
`
`Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Nishikawa in view of AAPA and Chang as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view
`
`of Sakamoto (US 2005/0213004).
`
`Regarding claim 12, Nishikawafails to disclose wherein beads having
`
`refractive index different from refractive index of the UV curing resin are dispersedin the
`
`UV curing resin.
`
`Sakamoto teachesto disperse beads having a refractive index different from
`
`the refractive index of transparent resin provided between a touch panel and a display
`
`panel
`
`for the purpose of scattering and suppressing undesirable reflections of ambient
`
`light passing through the touch panel.
`
`(Sakamoto: FIG. 5; para. 62. The transparent
`
`resin layer 23 is provided between a touch panel 26 and lower layers 30, 40, 50
`
`forming a display panel.)
`
`It therefore would have been obvious to one ofordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time the invention was madeto adapt the transparent UV curing resin 9 of AAPA FIG.
`
`12C to provide that its specific reflectance is achieved by dispersing beads having a
`
`refractive index different from the refractive index of the UV curing resin provided
`
`between a touch panel and a display panel to achieve the predictable result of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 12
`
`scattering and therefore suppressing undesirable reflections of ambientlight passing
`
`though touch panel 23.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`7.
`
`Applicant's argumentsfiled 12/16/13 have beenfully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive. Regarding claims 1 and 9, Applicant arguesthat the claim structureis
`
`completely different than the structure taught by Chang which requires forming the
`
`airing portion 55 in the adhesive member,not outside ofit in a plan view. Examiner
`
`disagrees. As cited above, figs. 5-6 and ¥ 74 of Chang teach that portions of the
`
`adhesive part 451 are removedto form airing portions 455 disposed in a peripheral area
`
`PA. Thus, contrary to the embodimentdisclosedin figs. 1-3 of Chang, the airing
`
`portions 455 do not overlap with adhesive part 451. Rather, the airing portions 455 are
`
`areas where the adhesive part is not applied. Becausethe airing portions 455 do not
`
`overlap with the adhesive part 451 in a plan view (e.g., see fig. 5 of Chang), and are
`
`defined as areas wherethe adhesive part 451 is not applied, Chang teaches “an air
`
`hole being formed to be outside of the UV curing resin and outside of the display region
`
`of the display panel in the plan view”as is claimed. Thus, the rejection of claims 1-10
`
`and 12 is maintained.
`
`Conclusion
`
`8.
`
`The prior art madeof record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 13
`
`Hsih (US 2008/0185192)
`
`Tamura (JP 2005158549)
`
`Kimura et al. (US 2011/0128114)
`
`Lee et al. (US 2013/0120674)
`
`Lin (US 2011/0193789)
`
`9.
`
`THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time
`
`policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the eventa first replyis filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTHshortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortenedstatutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuantto 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however,will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
`
`10.=Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to KEITH CRAWLEYwhosetelephone numberis
`
`(571)270-7616. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 7:30-5:00 EST,
`
`alternate Fri. off.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/237 ,434
`Art Unit: 2696
`
`Page 14
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Bipin Shalwala can be reached on (571)272-7681. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on accessto the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automatedinformation
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/KEITH CRAWLEY/
`Examiner, Art Unit 2696
`
`/JOE H CHENG/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2696
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket