throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
` FILING DATE
`
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`CONFIRMATIONNO.
`
`
`12/714,744
`
`03/01/2010
`
`Takao SATO
`
`501.50424X00
`
`7403
`
`20457
`
`7590
`
`11/27/2012
`
`ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP
`1300 NORTH SEVENTEENTH STREET
`SUITE 1800
`ARLINGTON,VA 22209-3873
`
`NGUYEN, HOAN C
`
`2871
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`11/27/2012
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`
` 12/714,744 SATO ET AL.
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`HOAN C. NGUYEN
`2871
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY(30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)X] Responsive to communication(s)filed on 06 November 2012.
`2a)X] This action is FINAL.
`2b) This action is non-final.
`3)L]
`Anelection was made bythe applicant in responseto a restriction requirementset forth during the interview on
`___; the restriction requirement and election have beenincorporated into this action.
`4)L] Sincethis application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`5)X] Claim(s) 1-78 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 6-17 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`6)L] Claim(s) _____is/are allowed.
`7)X] Claim(s) 1-5,18 is/are rejected.
`8)L] Claim(s) ___ is/are objected to.
`
`9)L] Claim(s)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may beeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway
`program ata participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http/Awww.usoto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index isp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.qov.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)L] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11) The drawing(s)filed on
`is/are: a)[_] accepted or b)[_] objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)[.] Acknowledgmentis made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`a)LJ All
`b)L] Some * c)L] None of:
`1.] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.L] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.L] Copiesof the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`
`
`Attachment(s)
`1) Cc Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) CT] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) | Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date.
`4) Cc] Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 09-12)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20121108
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/714,744
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1 and 18 based on the Response
`
`filed on 11/06/2012 have been considered but are mootin view of the new ground(s) of
`
`rejection. Therefore, this is Final action.
`
`Claims 6-17 are withdrawn. Claims 1-5 and 18 are elected.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
`
`(B) CONCLUSION.—Thespecification shall conclude with one or more claims
`particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a
`joint inventor regards as the invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA), second paragraph:
`
`The specification shall conclude with one or moreclaims particularly pointing out and
`distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
`
`Claims 1-5 and 18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA),
`
`second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly
`
`claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AlA the
`
`applicant regards asthe invention.
`
`Claim 1 cites “a plurality of rectangular second organic insulating films disposed
`
`so _as to avoid forming regions of the metal films and serving as basesof the column
`
`spacers in a mixed manneralong sides of the panel substrate region regions in a non-
`
`panel region at the periphery of each of the panel substrate regions”
`
`Whatdoes “a plurality of rectangular second organic insulating films disposed so
`
`as to avoid forming regions of the metal films” mean?
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/714,744
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Page 3
`
`TEASE SH
`
`
`
`PSD
`
`
`
`St
`4
`
`» BSHEORD
`
`:
`ASSS
`
`
`aSaN 3
`=
`sssssss
`S
`x
`s
`
`<
`
`EK
`
`3
`
`&
`
`;
`
`on
`
`33
`
`AS
`
`.
`
`:
`
`:me
`a SA
`
`SARA
`*
`%
`‘
`
`>>
`
`USB
`
`:
`SPS
`
`
`
`Claims 1 or 8 cites “a side positioned on a start side of the rubbing, among sides
`
`of each ofthe first organic insulating films PAS2, is defined as a first side, and each of
`
`sides substantially parallel to the rubbing direction, among sides of the second organic
`
`insulating film OPS disposed adjacentto the first side, is defined as a second side, a
`
`portion ofthefirst side that crosses the second side when the second side extends in
`
`the rubbing direction is formed so as to have a predetermined angle other than O and
`
`90 with respect to a direction perpendicular to the rubbing direction”.
`
`Whatare “among sidesof eachofthefirst organic insulating films PAS2”? What
`
`are “sides”?
`
`Whatis “each of sides substantially parallel to the rubbing direction”? What are
`
`“sides”?
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/714,744
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Page 4
`
`Whatis “among sides of the second organic insulating film OPS disposed
`
`adjacentto the first side”? What are “sides”?
`
`Claims 2-5 are rejected sine they depend on the indefinite claim 1.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form
`
`the basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`A personshall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in
`public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in
`the United States.
`
`Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Noritakeetal.
`
`(US6100584).
`
`
`
`Noritake et al. disclose a liquid crystal display device produced by rubbing (as shownin
`
`Fig. 1) aresin film formed on an uppersurface of a stacked body (20a or 20b) as shown
`
`in Fig. 3) in each of a plurality of panel regions 104 (as shownin Fig. 2) arranged in
`
`substantially perpendicular directions of a first substrate in a direction substantially
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/714,744
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Page 5
`
`parallel to or in a direction substantially perpendicular to the arrangementdirections of
`
`the plurality of panel regions, and forming, in the case wherea side positioned on a
`
`rubbing start side (as shownin Fig. 1), among sides of eachoffirst organic insulating
`
`films (layer insulation film 32), is defined as a first side, and each of sides parallel to a
`
`rubbing direction, among sides of a second organic insulating film (enclosure 11 is
`
`preferably made of the same material and in the same process as the black matrix 21,
`
`which is made of a polyimide resin) disposed adjacentto the first side, is defined as a
`
`second side, a portion of the first side that crosses the second side when the second
`
`side is extends in the rubbing direction so as to have a predetermined angle other than
`
`0° and 90° with respect to a direction perpendicular to the rubbing direction (as shownin
`
`Fig. 1), as viewed in a plane.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendmentnecessitated the new ground(s)of rejection presentedin
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the eventa first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTHshortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/714,744
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Page 6
`
`extension fee pursuantto 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however,will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the dateof this final action.
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to HOAN C. NGUYEN whosetelephone numberis
`
`(571)272-2296. The examiner can normally be reached on MONDAY-
`
`THURSDAY:8:00AM-4:30PM.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Edward Glick can be reached on (571) 272-2490. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on accessto the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automatedinformation
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/HOAN C NGUYEN/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket