throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313- 1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
`
` F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`12/946,980
`
`11/16/2010
`
`Hizuru Koshina
`
`PESL—129US
`
`1057
`
`EXAMINER
`RATNERPRESTIA —
`07’0”“ —
`7590
`52473
`PO. BOX 980
`SCULLY, STEVENM
`VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0980
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`1727
`
`
`
`
`NOT *ICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`07/05/2013
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`ptocorrespondence @ratnerprestia.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 12/946,980 KOSHINA, HIZURU
`
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`AIA (First Inventorto File)
`Office Action Summary
`
`1727STEVEN SCULLY first“
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`In no event however may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`-
`-
`
`Status
`
`1)I:I Responsive to communication(s) filed on
`[I A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)lX| This action is non-final.
`a)I:| This action is FINAL.
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:I Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under EX parte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`5)|XI CIaim(s)1-_20is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`6)|:l Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`7)IZ| Claim(s)_1 2-0 is/are rejected.
`8)I:I Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`9)|:l Claim((s)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`htt
`://www.usoto. ov/ atents/init events"
`
`
`
`h/index.‘s or send an inquiry to PF"I-Ifeedback{<‘buspto.qov.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)|:I The drawing(s) filed on _ is/are: a)I:I accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)I:I Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`b)I:I Some * c)I:I None of the:
`a)I:I All
`1.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:I Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`3) I] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`
`Paper NOISIIMa” Date —
`PTO/SB/08
`t
`St t
`I
`D'
`t'
`f
`2 IXI I
`)
`4) I:I Other:
`a emen (s)(
`Isc osure
`n orma Ion
`)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date 11/16/2010.
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 05-13)
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20130630
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/946,980
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 1727
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`1.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C.
`
`102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country
`or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application
`for patent in the United States.
`Claims 1-20 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by
`
`2.
`
`Herle (US2009/0191458).
`
`With respect to claims 1, 7, 14 and 20, Herle discloses an electrode of a non-
`
`aqueous electrolyte secondary battery comprises a current collector and a mixture
`
`comprising an electrode active material, a conductive material, and a binder on the
`
`current collector. The electrode active material comprises a porous composite material
`
`of the conductive material and a lithium absorbing nano-material. See abstract; [0023].
`
`Regarding claim 20, it is the position of the Examiner that the composite mixture of the
`
`prior art of the electrode active material and conductive material provides conductive
`
`material disposed within the electrode active material rather than outside of the active
`
`material.
`
`With respect to claim 2, Herle discloses the nano-material is a nano-dimensional
`
`material, a nanoparticle, or a nanotube. See [0049].
`
`With respect to claims 3, 7, 15 and 16, Herle discloses the nano-material is one
`
`of silicon, tin, silicon oxide or tin oxide. See [0048-0049].
`
`With respect to claims 4 and 5, Herle discloses the conductive material may be,
`
`for example, graphite, carbon black or acetylene black. See [0050].
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/946,980
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 1727
`
`With respect to claim 6, Herle discloses the same conductive material as the
`
`instant application. See [0050]. “[E]ven though product-by-process claims are limited
`
`by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product
`
`itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the
`
`product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the
`
`prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a
`
`different process.” In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir.
`
`1985).
`
`With respect to claims 9, 10 and 17, Herle discloses the nanoparticles are silicon
`
`or tin nanoparticles. See [0049].
`
`With respect to claims 11 and 12, Herle discloses a surfactant and organic
`
`solvent included. See [0055].
`
`With respect to claims 13 and 19, Herle discloses the electrode active material
`
`additionally comprises absorbed lithium. See entire document.
`
`With respect to claim 18, Herle discloses a separator. See [0044].
`
`Conclusion
`
`3.
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure. Gao et al. disclose composite materials of nano-dispersed
`
`silicon and tin and lithium for use as an anode material for rechargeable batteries.
`
`Contact/Correspondence Information
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/946,980
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 1727
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to STEVEN SCULLY whose telephone number is
`
`(571)270-5267. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday 11am to
`
`7pm.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached on (571 )272—1330. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272—1000.
`
`/Steven Scully/
`Examiner, Art Unit 1727
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket