throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313- 1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
`
` F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`13/496,516
`
`03/16/2012
`
`Yasushi Ogino
`
`MAT—10549US
`
`1674
`
`52473
`7590
`””000”
`W
`RATNERPRESTIA —
`
`LOTTER, DAV ) E
`PO. BOX 980
`
`VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0980
`
`2844
`
`
`
`
`09/30/2014
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`ptocorrespondence @ratnerprestia.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 13/496,516 OGINO ET AL.
`
`
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Art Unit
`Examiner
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`DAVID LOTTER its“ 2844
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 3/16/2012.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)|ZI This action is non-final.
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`3)|:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) 1,3 and4 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`is/are allowed.
`6)|:I Claim(s)
`
`7)|Z| Claim(s)_,_1 3 and4 is/are rejected.
`8)|:| Claim(s)_ is/are objected to.
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`9)|:I Claim((s)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`hit
`I/'/\WII‘IN.USOIO. ov/ atentS/init events/
`
`
`
`iindex.‘s or send an inquiry to PPI-iieedback{®usgtc.00v.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:l The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)|Xl The drawing(s) filed on 3/16/2012is/are: a)|:l accepted or b)lX| objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)IXI Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)IZl All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.IXI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) I] InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20140820
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AlA first to invent
`
`provisions.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Continued Examination under 37 CFR 1. 1 14
`
`A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this
`
`application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action
`
`has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on
`
`6/14/2014 has been entered.
`
`Drawings
`
`Figure 6 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only
`
`that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g).
`
`The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a) because they fail to show a
`
`“trigger circuit” and “switching unit” as described in the specification. Any structural
`
`detail that is essential for a proper understanding of the disclosed invention should be
`
`shown in the drawing. MPEP § 608.02(d).
`
`It is noted a rectangular box lacks sufficient detail to illustrate a “trigger circuit”
`
`and “switching unit” as described in the Specification and as recited in Applicant’s
`
`claims.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`Conventional features disclosed in the description and claims, where their
`
`detailed illustration is not essential for a proper understanding of the invention, should
`
`be illustrated in the drawing in the form of a graphical drawing symbol or a labeled
`
`representation, (e.g., a labeled rectangular box).
`
`When the invention consists of an improvement on an old machine the drawing
`
`must when possible exhibit, in one or more views, the improved portion itself,
`
`disconnected from the old structure, an also in another view, so much only of the old
`
`structure as will suffice to show the connection of the invention therewith.
`
`(MPEP
`
`60802(d)).
`
`Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121 (d) are required in
`
`reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended
`
`replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate
`
`prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure
`
`number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure
`
`is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet,
`
`and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate
`
`changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for
`
`consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering
`
`of the remaining figures.
`
`Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be
`
`labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37
`
`CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The
`
`objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance.
`
`Claim Interpretations - 35 USC § 1 12
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f):
`
`(f) Element in Claim for a Combination. — An element in a claim for a combination may be
`expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of
`structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the
`corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents
`thereof.
`
`The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph:
`
`An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing
`a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and
`such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts
`described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
`
`Claim 1 is interpreted under 35 USC § 112, sixth paragraph because it
`
`recites functions and fails to recite sufficiently definite structures, materials or
`
`acts to perform the recited function.
`
`Claims 1 does not use the word "means". Absence of the word “means” (or “step
`
`for”) in a claim creates a rebuttab/e presumption that the claim element is not to be
`
`treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. However, the presumption
`
`that § 112, sixth paragraph is not invoked is rebutted when the claim element recites
`
`function but fails to recite sufficiently definite structure, material or acts to perform that
`
`function.
`
`Claim 1
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`Claim 1 recites the following limitation: “a control unit, that determines a quantity
`
`of light to be emitted by the flash discharge tube, and based on the determination, the
`
`control unit controls and directs the trigger circuit to switch between a first mode... and
`
`a second mode. .
`
`The claim limitation uses the term “control unit” as a substitute for “means”.
`
`In
`
`other words, the term is used as placeholder.
`
`The placeholder is modified by functional language: “determines a quantity of
`
`light to be emitted by the flash discharge tube, and based on the determination
`
`...controls and directs the trigger circuit to switch between a first mode... and a second
`
`mode...”
`
`The placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure or material or acts for
`
`performing their respective claimed functions.
`
`In other words, a control unit alone is
`
`insufficient structure to achieve “that determines a quantity of light to be emitted by the
`
`flash discharge tube, and based on the determination, the control unit controls and
`
`directs the trigger circuit to switch between a first mode... and a second mode. .
`
`Since
`
`the above limitation invokes 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, the limitation is interpreted
`
`to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification that achieves the
`
`claimed function, and equivalents thereof.
`
`A review of the specification shows structure insufficient for achieving the
`
`claimed function as described in the specification (see generally paragraphs [0042,
`
`[0050], [0063]). There is no description or illustration of structure, material or acts (e.g.,
`
`an algorithm, flow chart or process steps) by which control unit determines a quantity of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`light to be emitted, or by which the control unit controls and directs the trigger circuit to
`
`switch between a first mode and a second mode.
`
`If applicant wishes to provide further explanation or dispute the examiner’s
`
`interpretation of the corresponding structure, applicant must identify the corresponding
`
`structure with reference to the specification by page and line number, and to the
`
`drawing, if any, by reference characters in response to this Office action.
`
`If applicant does not intend to have the claim limitation(s) treated under 35
`
`U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112 , sixth paragraph, applicant may amend the
`
`claim(s) so that it/they will clearly not invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112,
`
`sixth paragraph, or present a sufficient showing that the claim recites/recite sufficient
`
`structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function to preclude application of
`
`35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph.
`
`For more information, see MPEP § 2173 et seq. and Supplementary Examination
`
`Guidelines for Determining Compliance With 35 U. S. C. 112 and for Treatment of
`
`Related Issues in PatentApp/ications, 76 FR 7162, 7167 (Feb. 9, 2011).
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 1 12
`
`The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a):
`
`IN GEN ERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the
`(a)
`invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise,
`and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it
`is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode
`contemplated by the inventor orjoint inventor of carrying out the invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112:
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the
`manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to
`enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly
`connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the
`inventor of carrying out his invention.
`
`Claim 1
`
`is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), first
`
`paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s)
`
`contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to
`
`reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor,
`
`or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of
`
`the claimed invention.
`
`Claim 1
`
`The claim is construed in accordance with 35 USC 112, 6th paragraph as noted
`
`above. There is no written description of a structure sufficient to achieve the claimed
`
`function “that determines a quantity of light to be emitted by the flash discharge tube,
`
`and based on the determination, the control unit controls and directs the trigger circuit to
`
`switch between a first mode... and a second mode...” Thus the claim fails convey to
`
`one of ordinary skill in the art the invention had possession of the claimed invention.
`
`There is no description of structure that determines a quantity of light to be emitted by
`
`the flash discharge tube. There is insufficient written description concerning how the
`
`control unit controls and directs the trigger circuit to switch between a first mode... and
`
`a second mode...”
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`(b) CONCLUSION—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly
`pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor
`regards as the invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph:
`The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly
`claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
`
`Claim 1
`
`is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second
`
`paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the
`
`subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards
`
`as the invention.
`
`Claim 1 recites in part “a single trigger circuit that outputs a trigger signal to the
`
`external triggering electrodes...” It is unclear how a single trigger circuit outputs a trigger
`
`signal to “to the external triggering electrodes” when the claim 1 also recites "wherein
`
`the single trigger circuit outputs voltage as the trigger signal.”
`
`Specifically, in the first mode “the first voltage is applied to one of the plurality of
`
`external triggering electrodes” and in the second mode “a voltage is applied to at least
`
`one of a) said one of the external triggering electrodes, and b) another of the external
`
`triggering electrodes, wherein in said second mode voltage is applied to an area of the
`
`flash discharge tube larger than the predetermined attachment area.” The claim is
`
`indefinite because there is no corresponding structure found for "wherein in said second
`
`mode voltage is applied to an area of the flash discharge tube larger than the
`
`predetermined attachment area." There is insufficient structure found that determines
`
`an area to which the second mode voltage should be applied or to determine relative
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 9
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`area, i.e., an area of the flash discharge tube larger than the predetermined attachment
`
`area. A switch alone is not capable of achieving this function.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis
`
`for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described
`as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to
`be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been
`obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which
`said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the
`invention was made.
`
`Claims 1, 3-4 as best understood are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as
`
`being unpatentable over Haruhiko (JP 2003-288861) in view of Sugahara (US
`
`5,987,261) in view of Inoue (Japan Utility Application no. 857-60857).
`
`Regarding claim 1 as best understood Haruhiko discloses
`
`a flash discharge tube (Fig. 1, at 1 — flash discharge tube);
`
`a plurality of external triggering electrodes (Fig. 1, at 14, 15 - electrodes) formed
`
`on an outer surface of the flash discharge tube (Fig. 1, at 14, 15 - electrodes).
`
`two trigger circuits (Fig. 3 at 16, 17 and Haruhiko, paragraphs [0021-0023]) that
`
`outputs a trigger signal to the external triggering electrodes making the flash discharge
`
`tube emit light at a predetermined timing (Haruhiko, Fig. 3, output of 16 and 17 to 14
`
`and 15 respectively, and paragraph [0022]);
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 10
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`a first mode in which voltage is applied to one of the plurality of external
`
`triggering electrodes having a predetermined attachment area to the flash discharge
`
`tube (Haruhiko, paragraph [0001 and paragraph [0022]),
`
`a second mode (Haruhiko, paragraph [0001] in which a voltage is applied to at
`
`least one of
`
`a) said one of the external triggering electrodes (Haruhiko, paragraphs
`
`[0022-0023]), and
`
`b) another of the external triggering electrodes (Haruhiko, paragraphs
`
`[0022-0023]), wherein in said second mode voltage is applied to an area of the
`
`flash discharge tube larger than the predetermined attachment area,
`
`Haruhiko does not explicitly disclose a switching unit that switches
`
`between the first mode and the second mode; wherein the trigger circuit outputs
`
`voltage as the trigger signal and the switching unit supplies the voltage output
`
`from the trigger circuit to said one and said another of the external triggering
`
`electrodes.
`
`lnoue discloses a switching unit (lnoue, paragraph 1) that switches
`
`between the first mode and the second mode (lnoue, paragraph 1); wherein the
`
`trigger circuit outputs voltage as the trigger signal (lnoue, paragraph 1) and the
`
`switching unit (lnoue, paragraph 1) supplies the voltage output from the trigger
`
`circuit to said one and said another of the external triggering electrodes (lnoue,
`
`paragraph 1).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 11
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`At the time of the invention it was well known to use a switch to switch between
`
`modes, as evidenced by lnoue. (lnoue, paragraph 1) It would have been a matter of
`
`obvious design choice to use a switching unit such as that disclosed by lnoue in the
`
`device of Haruhiko to switch between modes. lnoue specifically teaches using switches
`
`disposed between the trigger circuit and the plurality of electrodes to switch output
`
`voltages to the plurality of electrodes
`
`Haruhiko in view of lnoue may not explicitly
`
`disclose:
`
`a control unit, that determines a quantity of light to be emitted by the flash
`
`discharge tube, and based on a determination, the control unit controls and directs the
`
`trigger circuit.
`
`However, Sugahara discloses
`
`a control unit (Fig. 6, at 8, CPU), that determines a quantity of light to be emitted
`
`by the flash discharge tube (Fig. 6, CPU 8 output to light generation amount controller
`
`11) and based on a determination, the control unit controls and directs a trigger circuit
`
`(Fig. 6, at 11, light generation amount controller).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the strobe
`
`device disclosed by Haruhiko in view of lnoue in accordance with the teaching of
`
`Sugahara regarding a controller for a strobe device that controls the quantity of light
`
`generated by the strobe (Sugahara, column 1, lines 58-61) to arrive at Applicant’s
`
`claimed invention in order have a strobe device that obtains an optimum quantity of light
`
`(column 1, lines 45-47).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 12
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`Haruhiko as modified by Inoue and Sugahara discloses all of the features found
`
`in claim 1 except for wherein a single trigger circuit outputs voltage as the trigger signal.
`
`However, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
`time the invention was made to integrate the two trigger circuits disclosed by Haruhiko
`
`into one trigger circuit, since it has been held that making a device integral requires only
`
`routine skill in the art (see In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 968, 144 USPQ 347, 349 (CCPA
`
`1965), see also Howard v. Detroit Stove Works, 150 U.S. 164 (1893)).
`
`Regarding claim 3 Haruhiko in view of lnoue as modified by Sugahara discloses
`
`the device of claim 1.
`
`Sugahara further discloses ‘wherein the control unit applies the voltage to the
`
`external triggering electrode after switching the first and second modes (see for
`
`example column 3, lines 10-15, see also for example column 3, lines 25-27).
`
`At the time of the invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary
`
`skill in the art to modify the flash discharge tube disclosed by Haruhiko in accordance
`
`with the teaching of Sugahara regarding controllers used in flash discharge tubes in
`
`order to determine an optimal quantity of light (Sugahara, column 1, lines 45-47, column
`
`3, lines 29-34).
`
`Regarding claim 4 Haruhiko as modified by Sugahara discloses the device of
`
`claim 1.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 13
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`Sugahara further discloses ‘wherein the control unit switches to the first mode
`
`when making the flash discharge tube emits a small quantity of light’ (see for example
`
`column 3, lines 10-15, see also for example column 3, lines 25-27)
`
`and switches to the second mode when making the flash discharge tube emits a
`
`large quantity of light (see for example column 3, lines 10-15, see also for example
`
`column 3, lines 25-27).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to modify the flash discharge tube disclosed by Haruhiko in accordance with
`
`the teaching of Sugahara regarding a light quantity controller used in flash discharge
`
`tubes in order to determine an optimal quantity of light (Sugahara, column 1, lines 45-
`
`47, column 3, lines 29-34).
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant's arguments filed 9 June 2014 have been fully considered but they are
`
`not persuasive.
`
`The Applicant emphasizes having "a predetermined attachment area...“ on page
`
`5 however Applicant's arguments do not comply with 37 CFR 1.111(c) because they do
`
`not clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present in
`
`view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made.
`
`Further, they do not show how the amendments avoid such references or objections.
`
`The Applicant asserts on pages 5-6 that neither Haruhiko nor Sugahara teach
`
`using a m trigger circuit which controls a trigger circuit to switch between two modes
`
`such that voltages apply to a larger area in the second mode than is applied in the first
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 13/496,516
`
`Page 14
`
`Art Unit: 2844
`
`mode. The Examiner asserts that making a part integral requires only routine skill in the
`
`art.
`
`In this case integrating two trigger circuits into one single trigger circuit requires
`
`only routine skill in the art.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to DAVID LOTTER whose telephone number is (571 )270-
`
`7422. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:30am-5PM (off
`
`every other Friday).
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Alex Taningco can be reached on 571-272—8048. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket