throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`14/102,168
`
`12/10/2013
`
`Hiroshi Tsuji
`
`732256.417
`
`7030
`
`Seed Intellectual Property Law Group PLLC
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`HAILE’BENYAM
`
`PAPER NUIVIBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2681
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`08/19/2015
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`patentinfo @ seedip.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 14/102,168 TSUJI ET AL.
`
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Office Action Summary
`
`BENYAM HAILE if?“ 2681
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 12/10/2013.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)IZI This action is non-final.
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) 1-21 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above cIaim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`is/are allowed.
`6)I:I Claim(s)
`
`7)|Z| Claim(s 1-10 12 and 15-21 is/are rejected.
`)
`8)|Z| Claim(s) 11,13 and 14 is/are objected to.
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`9)I:I Claim((s)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`
`
`:/'I’\WIIW.LIsnto. ovI’ atentS/init events/
`h/‘indexfis orsend an inquiryto PPI-iieedbackf,c‘bLIsgtc.00v.
`
`hit
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:l The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)|Xl The drawing(s) filed on 12/10/2014 is/are: a)IXI accepted or b)|:l objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)IXI Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)IZl All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.IXI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) E InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20150728
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`1.
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre—AIA first to invent provisions.
`
`2.
`
`Claims 1-21 are pending.
`
`Status of Claims
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 USC. 112(b):
`
`(b) CONCLUSION.7The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing
`out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the
`invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 USC. 112 (pre—AIA), second paragraph:
`The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly
`claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claim 4 is rejected under 35 USC. 112(b) or 35 USC. 112 (pre—AIA), second
`
`paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject
`
`matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre—AIA the applicant regards as the
`
`invention.
`
`5.
`
`The term "most recently" in claim 4 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite.
`
`The term "most recently" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a
`
`standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be
`
`reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The term used to define the amount of time
`
`elapsed after the last normal response is not explicitly defined and the degree to how far back
`
`“most recently” go is not definite.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`6.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 USC.
`
`102 and 103 (or as subject to pre—AIA 35 USC. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the
`
`statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art
`
`relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
`
`(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in
`public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the
`United States.
`
`7.
`
`Claim 20 is rejected under pre—AIA 35 USC. 102(b) as being anticipated by Menard et
`
`al. [Menard, US 2002/0169539].
`
`As to claim 20. Menard discloses A locator, [fig 12] comprising:
`
`a radio communication section, (110A) that performs communication with a mobile
`
`information terminal, (300), using a near field radio communication protocol, as described
`
`in [par. 83]; and
`
`a notification section that generates a confirmation sound, (170), wherein
`
`upon reception of a calling signal transmitted from the mobile information terminal,
`
`the radio communication section transmits a response signal to the mobile information
`
`terminal in response to the calling signal, as illustrated in [fig 6].
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`8.
`
`The following is a quotation of pre—AIA 35 USC. 103(a) which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/ 102,168
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`9.
`
`The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere C0., 383 US. 1, 148 USPQ 459
`
`(1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under pre—
`
`AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
`
`4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or
`
`nonobviousness.
`
`10.
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-7 are rejected under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Menard et al. [Menard, US 2002/0169539] in View of Nabeshima et al. [Nabeshima, JP 2002-
`
`223478 A] English machine translation attached.
`
`As to claim 1. Menard discloses A locator system comprising:
`
`a mobile information terminal, (300), that includes a public radio communication
`
`section performing radio communication with a public radio network, (325) as illustrated in
`
`[fig. 11] and described in [par. 45, 82], that the second device communicates through a public
`
`communication network, (200), and that includes a near field radio communication section,
`
`(330), performing communication with a specific apparatus using a near field radio
`
`communication protocol, as described in [par. 146], the tag (100) is tracked by the device (300)
`
`using short range, bi—directional communication; and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/ 102,168
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`a radio communication section that communicates with the mobile information
`
`terminal using a near field radio communication protocol, (100) as described in [par. 46,
`
`146] and illustrated in [fig. 14], wherein:
`
`the mobile information terminal transmits a locator calling signal used for
`
`calling a locator regularly and waits for a response signal when the mobile
`
`information terminal is set in a locator monitoring mode, [par. 77] that the mobile
`
`device can be put in a “set” mode which allows subsequent location information to be
`
`transferred, the response signal being transmitted from the locator, as illustrated in
`
`[fig. 5, 6] and described in [par. 57—63] that the second mobile device sends a request for
`
`a location information and the mobile device (100) responds with the location
`
`information wherein the request can be a scheduled periodic query, [par. 76];
`
`when a state in which the mobile information terminal does not receive the
`
`response signal in a normal way continues for a predetermined time, the response
`
`signal being transmitted from the locator in response to the locator calling signal,
`
`[par. 130] teaches that when the range is exceeded, the communication RF range is
`
`increased and communication is re—established wherein the preset range is associated
`
`with the signal strength, [par. 131].
`
`Menard fails to specifically disclose, in the same embodiment, that the mobile terminal
`
`generates a confirmation sound when it does not receive a response signal.
`
`Nabeshima teaches a mobile terminal service wherein the system comprises a portable
`
`terminal (2) able to track a slave unit (6) wherein when the signal received from the slave unit (6)
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`is below a predetermined level, the terminal generates a notification sound as described in [par.
`
`19].
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to understand that the device of Menard can lose communication with the device (100) when
`
`range is exceeded due to having the range set based on the RF signal strength that will trigger the
`
`alarm sound to be generated.
`
`As to claim 2. Menard discloses The locator system according to claim 1, wherein:
`
`radio communication protocol is a communication protocol compliant with a time division
`
`multiple access (TDMA)/time division duplex (TDD) standard in which one frame is
`
`divided into N slots; and when transmitting the locator calling signal, the mobile
`
`information terminal, first, performs consecutive transmission of a calling signal, waits for
`
`the response signal to be transmitted from the locator regularly during the consecutive
`
`transmission, stops the consecutive transmission of the calling signal by being triggered
`
`upon reception of the response signal and transmits a calling signal corresponding to one
`
`slot at a predetermined period and receives a response signal corresponding to one slot at a
`
`timing shifted from a timing of the transmission of the calling signal after the consecutive
`
`transmission stops, [par. 92, 95] that both the first and second mobile device incorporate a
`
`communication section (325, 135A), that implements a Digital Enhanced Cordless
`
`telecommunications (DECT) as a long range communication module.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art can easily understand that DECT uses TDMA/TDD
`
`communication protocol that divides the frames into multiple slots wherein the transmission is
`
`done using predetermined time slots and waiting a consecutive, wait time to avoid collision and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`responding with the next transmission as a well—known and standard way of implementing a
`
`TDMA communication scheme.
`
`Menard fails to disclose that the DECT is used as near field communication protocol.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art can easily understand that DECT is widely used as
`
`communication means for a cordless phone to establish connection between the cordless phone
`
`and the base station. The implementation is used in a short distance communication between the
`
`cordless telephone and the base station in a house or around the vicinity of the base station.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to use the DECT communication system of Menard as the short range communication scheme as
`
`it is widely used and saves implementation time and cost for the system.
`
`As to claim 3. Menard discloses The locator system according to claim 1, wherein,
`
`when detecting that a reception level of the signal transmitted from the locator is lower
`
`than a predetermined threshold level, the mobile information terminal operates while
`
`regarding that a normal response is not transmitted from the locator, [par. 130, 131] teaches
`
`that when the predetermined range is exceeded, which is set based on the RF signal strength, the
`
`mobile device re—establishes communication.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art can understand that the mobile device re—establishes
`
`communication, when the communication is dropped and normal communication cannot be
`
`continued or when the device determines that the normal communication under the previous
`
`condition cannot be reliable.
`
`As to claim 5. Menard discloses The locator system according to claim 1, wherein the
`
`period of the operation of calling the locator is controlled to be shortened in accordance
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`with an instruction transmitted from outside of the locator system through the public radio
`
`network, as illustrated in [fig. 9] and described in [par. 66] that the device (100) transmits the
`
`location information shortened to within the set time period (605) which is set by a user or
`
`software through the network (200).
`
`As to claim 6. Menard fails to disclose The locator system according to claim 1,
`
`wherein: the mobile information terminal includes an input key switch, ; and when a
`
`normal response is not transmitted from the locator for an operation of calling the locator,
`
`the mobile information terminal permits an emergency notification using the input key
`
`switch.
`
`Menard teaches that the system comprises a user controlled switch to place the mobile
`
`device in a mode which allows location information to be transferred using near field
`
`communication methods or other wireless technology, [par. 78]; wherein the system is disclosed
`
`to preferentially communicate using one form of communication at one time and switch to
`
`another form of communication at another time based on availability, [par. 94].
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art can easily understand that the system of Menard can
`
`utilize the user operated switch used to manipulate the mode of communication to switch from
`
`the normal mode of communication to an emergency communication.
`
`As to claim 7. Menard fails to disclose The locator system according to claim 6,
`
`wherein the emergency notification causes a predetermined call origination operation to be
`
`performed through the public radio network.
`
`Menard teaches that the system comprises a user controlled switch to place the mobile
`
`device in a mode which allows location information to be transferred using near field
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 9
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`communication methods or other wireless technology, [par. 78]; wherein the system is disclosed
`
`to preferentially communicate using one form of communication at one time and switch to
`
`another form of communication at another time based on availability, [par. 94].
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art can easily understand that the system of Menard can
`
`utilize the user operated switch used to manipulate the mode of communication to switch from
`
`the normal mode of communication to an emergency communication wherein the emergency
`
`communication mode can be set to be a public radio network.
`
`11.
`
`Claims 9, 10, 15, 18 and 21 are rejected under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Nabeshima in View of Menard.
`
`As to claim 9. Nabeshima discloses A locator system, [fig 2], comprising:
`
`a mobile information terminal, (2) which is described to be portable in [par. 23], that
`
`includes a public radio communication section performing radio communication with a
`
`public radio network and that includes a near field radio communication section
`
`performing communication with a specific apparatus using a near field radio
`
`communication protocol, as described in [par. 22] of the translated description; and
`
`a locator, (6), that includes a radio communication section performing
`
`communication with the mobile information terminal, and that includes a user operable
`
`switch, as described in [par. 29], wherein:
`
`the radio communication section of the locator performs an operation of
`
`searching for the mobile information terminal in accordance with a user operation
`
`of pressing the switch, as described in [par. 29] that when the report switch (7) on the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/ 102,168
`
`Page 10
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`tag (6) is operated, the slave unit (6) transmits a signal towards the portable terminal (2)
`
`to check the communication link with the portable terminal; and
`
`upon reception of a switch pressing message from the locator, the mobile
`
`information terminal generates a confirmation sound, wherein upon reception of the
`
`signal, the portable terminal generates a buzzing confirmation sound, [par. 24].
`
`Nabeshima fails to teach that the mobile terminal uses a near field radio
`
`communication protocol and transmits a response message representing the reception of
`
`the message.
`
`Menard teaches system and method for wireless tracking wherein while a request is
`
`received from one module, the receiving module transmits location information as reply, as
`
`illustrated in [fig. 6] and described in [par. 60] wherein the two systems use near field
`
`communication, as described in [par. 146], the tag (100) is tracked by the device (300) using
`
`short range, bi—directional communication.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to combine the teachings of Nabeshima with that of Menard so that by replying to the emergency
`
`request of the slave, the slave can be used to locate the mobile terminal when the mobile terminal
`
`is lost in the vicinity of the slave.
`
`As to claim 10. Nabeshima discloses The locator system according to claim 9, wherein
`
`the locator transmits a terminal calling signal having a signal intensity higher than that of a
`
`normal case using a channel receivable by the mobile information terminal when a
`
`terminal search mode starts in accordance with the user operation, as described in [par. 20]
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 11
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`the signal level is higher when the notification switch (7) is used by using the public network
`
`which is receivable by the mobile terminal as described in [par. 22].
`
`As to claim 15. Nabeshima discloses The locator system according to claim 9, wherein
`
`the mobile information terminal changes a pattern of a confirmation sound in accordance
`
`with the signal intensity of the terminal calling signal transmitted from the locator, [par. 12]
`
`that sound is used for higher signal level and light is used as notification for lower signal level.
`
`As to claim 18. Nabeshima discloses A mobile information terminal, (2) comprising:
`
`a public radio communication section that performs radio communication with a
`
`public radio network; radio communication section that performs communication with a
`
`specific apparatus using a communication protocol; an operation display section, (13) that
`
`is used for receiving various operations and performing various display operations, as
`
`described in [par. 22];
`
`a notification section that generates a sound, 914); and
`
`a control section, (10) wherein
`
`when the mobile information, [par. 23] that it operates in sleep mode and normal state,
`
`terminal is set in a locator monitoring mode, the control section controls the radio
`
`communication section to transmit a locator calling signal used for calling the locator
`
`regularly, as described in [par. 23], and waits for a response signal transmitted from the
`
`locator, and the control section controls the notification section to generate a confirmation
`
`sound when a state in which a response signal transmitted from the locator in response to
`
`the locator calling signal is not received in a normal way continues for a predetermined
`
`time, as describe in [par. 24].
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/ 102,168
`
`Page 12
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`Nabeshima fails to teach that the mobile terminal uses a near field radio
`
`communication protocol to communicate with the locator.
`
`Menard teaches system and method for wireless tracking wherein while a request is
`
`received from one module, the receiving module transmits location information as reply, as
`
`illustrated in [fig. 6] and described in [par. 60] wherein the two systems use near field
`
`communication, as described in [par. 146], the tag (100) is tracked by the device (300) using
`
`short range, bi—directional communication.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to combine the teachings of Nabeshima with that of Menard so that by replying to the emergency
`
`request of the slave, the slave can be used to locate the mobile terminal when the mobile terminal
`
`is lost in the vicinity of the slave.
`
`As to claim 21. Nabeshima discloses A locator, (6) comprising:
`
`a radio communication section, (110A) that performs communication with a mobile
`
`information terminal and a key switch that is operable by a user, as described in [par. 29],
`
`wherein:
`
`the radio communication section performs an operation of searching for the
`
`mobile information terminal by operating the key switch, as described in [par. 29]
`
`that when the report switch (7) on the tag (6) is operated, the slave unit (6) transmits a
`
`signal towards the portable terminal (2) to check the communication link with the
`
`portable terminal; and
`
`upon reception of a response from the mobile information terminal, the
`
`locator transmits a switch pressing message to the mobile information terminal,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/ 102,168
`
`Page 13
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`wherein upon reception of the signal, the portable terminal generates a buzzing
`
`confirmation sound, [par. 24].
`
`Nabeshima fails to teach that the mobile terminal uses a near field radio
`
`communication protocol and comprises a notification section that generates confirmation
`
`sound.
`
`Menard teaches system and method for wireless tracking wherein the system comprises a
`
`locator (100) with an alarm module (170) wherein while a request is received from one module,
`
`the receiving module transmits location information as reply, as illustrated in [fig. 6] and
`
`described in [par. 60] wherein the two systems use near field communication, as described in
`
`[par. 146], the tag (100) is tracked by the device (300) using short range, bi—directional
`
`communication.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to combine the teachings of Nabeshima with that of Menard so that by replying to the emergency
`
`request of the slave, the slave can be used to locate the mobile terminal when the mobile terminal
`
`is lost in the vicinity of the slave.
`
`12.
`
`Claim 16 is rejected under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Nabeshima.
`
`As to claim 16. Nabeshima discloses A locator system comprising:
`
`a mobile information terminal, (2), that includes a public radio communication
`
`section performing radio communication with a public radio network, that includes a near
`
`field radio communication section performing communication with a specific apparatus
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 14
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`using a near field radio communication protocol, and that includes an operation display
`
`section used for receiving various operations and performing various display operations, as
`
`described in [par. 22]; and
`
`a locator, (6), that includes a radio communication section communicating with the
`
`mobile information terminal using a near field radio communication protocol and that
`
`includes a key switch operable by a user, as described in [par. 29], wherein:
`
`the locator performs an operation of searching for the mobile information
`
`terminal by starting the radio communication section by operating the key switch,
`
`and upon reception of a response from the mobile information terminal, the locator
`
`transmits a switch pressing message to the mobile information terminal, as described
`
`in [par. 29] that when the report switch (7) on the tag (6) is operated, the slave unit (6)
`
`transmits a signal towards the portable terminal (2) to check the communication link with
`
`the portable terminal;
`
`the mobile information terminal sounds a voice signal operation on the
`
`operation display section for allowing a user intention to be inputted, upon
`
`reception of the switch pressing message from the locator, wherein upon reception of
`
`the signal, the portable terminal generates a buzzing confirmation sound, [par. 24]; and
`
`the mobile information terminal automatically performs an operation of
`
`originating a call toward an emergency notification destination when a
`
`predetermined operation is performed by the user or when no user input operation
`
`is performed within a predetermined time after the display operation is performed,
`
`as described in [par. 24].
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 15
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`Nabeshima fails to disclose that the mobile terminal performs a display operation upon
`
`receiving a switch pressing message from the locator.
`
`Nabeshima teaches a mobile terminal (2) comprising a display (13) which is used as
`
`notification means and displaying various status of the terminal, as described in [par. 22].
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art can easily understand that the display module of the
`
`portable terminal can be used to display the notification to the user upon receiving a switch
`
`pressing message so that the user can be notified of the emergency incase the buzzer is
`
`malfunctioning as a second layer of notification.
`
`13.
`
`Claim 8 is rejected under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Menard
`
`in view of Quinonez [US 6,838,987].
`
`As to claim 8. Menard fails to disclose The locator system according to claim 1,
`
`wherein the mobile information terminal further includes a reset operation section that
`
`allows a user to reset the mobile information terminal through an operation of the mobile
`
`information terminal.
`
`Quinonez teaches a vehicle locating system wherein the vehicle comprises a vehicle
`
`transponder (20) that can receive a locate request from a handheld device (12) wherein the
`
`handheld device (12) comprises a reset button (42) to reset the operation of the handheld device,
`
`[col. 4, lines 15—20].
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to combine the teachings of Menard with that od Quinonez so that by having the reset button, the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/ 102,168
`
`Page 16
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`system can suspend the operation of the mobile device when the required operation is satisfied
`
`before the normal completion of the operation to save battery power.
`
`14.
`
`Claim 12 is rejected under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Nabeshima in view of Menard as applied to claim 9 above, further in view of Right et al.
`
`[Right, US 5,959,528].
`
`As to claim 12. The combination of Nabeshima and Menard fails to disclose The locator
`
`system according to claim 9, wherein the locator is switched to a communication mode
`
`synchronized with the mobile information terminal upon reception of the response message
`
`from the mobile information terminal.
`
`Right teaches auto synchronous output module and system wherein a master unit
`
`controlling modules in a zone wherein when an active command is received at the modules, the
`
`devices are synchronized with the master module, as described in [claim 4].
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to combine the teachings of the combination of Nabeshima and Menard with that of Right so that
`
`by synchronizing the locator and the mobile module upon receiving a command, the two devices
`
`can communicate with a pre—established protocol.
`
`15.
`
`Claim 17 is rejected under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Nabeshima in view of Gutierres et al. [Gutierres, US 2014/0173439].
`
`As to claim 17. Nabeshima fails to disclose The locator system according to claim 16,
`
`wherein the mobile information terminal displays at least a button icon that represents a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 17
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`state of emergency or an operation error on the operation display section upon reception of
`
`the switch pressing message from the locator.
`
`Gutierres teaches a user interface for object tracking wherein the system uses a mobile
`
`device to track objects as illustrated in [fig. 3 and 11A] wherein when the object to be tracked
`
`activates a switch (137) to locate the mobile device or pair with the mobile device, [par. 98]
`
`wherein when receiving the pairing command, he mobile device notifies the user of the request
`
`wherein the system generates a user interface including a button for the user to complete the
`
`request, [par. 57, 58].
`
`It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention
`
`to combine the teachings of Nabeshima with that of Gutierres so that by having an
`
`acknowledgment button on the mobile device in response to the request from the locator, the user
`
`can be notified of the request and acknowledge the request.
`
`16.
`
`Claims 19 is rejected under pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Nabeshima in view of Menard as applied to claim 18 above, further in view of Sipila [US
`
`6,556,586].
`
`As to claim 19. The combination of Nabeshima and Menard fails to disclose The mobile
`
`information terminal according to claim 18, wherein: the near field radio communication
`
`protocol is a communication protocol compliant with a time division multiple access
`
`(TDMA)/time division duplex (TDD) standard in which one frame is divided into N slots;
`
`and an operation of transmitting the calling signal using (N-l) slots and then waiting for
`
`reception of the response signal using one slot is performed regularly.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/102,168
`
`Page 18
`
`Art Unit: 2681
`
`Sipila teaches a system for use the DECT protocol in which one frame is divided into N
`
`slots (column 1, lines 36-39, “DECT provides on the physical layer, in the frequency band
`
`of 1880-1900 MHz, 10 carriers each of which are carrying 24 TDMA slots”); and the
`
`contro

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket