throbber
vs! “111%
`\.\_:
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`wwwusptogov
`
`
`
`
`
`14/365,706
`
`06/16/2014
`
`Masanori Kobayashi
`
`20240.0027USWO
`
`9667
`
`53148
`7590
`05’1“)”
`HAMRE, SCHUMANN,MUELLER&LARSONP.C. —
`45 South Seventh Street
`BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S
`Suite 2700
`MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402- 1683
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`3746
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/19/2017
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/0r attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`PTOMail @hsml.com
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 14/365,706 KOBAYASHI ET AL.
`
`
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Art Unit
`Examiner
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`CHRISTOPHER BOBISH [SENS 3746
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 03/13/2017.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)|ZI This action is non-final.
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) gas/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`is/are allowed.
`6)I:I Claim(s)
`7)|Z| CIaim(s)_1-5is/are rejected.
`8)|:I Claim(s)_ is/are objected to.
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`9)I:I Claim((s)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`hit
`:/'/\W¢W.LISI>I‘.0. ovI’ atentS/init events/
`
`
`
`iindex.‘s or send an inquiry to PPI-iieedback{®usgtc.00v.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:l The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)I:l The drawing(s) filed on
`is/are: a)I:I accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)IXI Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)IZl All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.IXI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) D Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) I] InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20170515
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/365,706
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 3746
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent
`
`provisions.
`
`Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1. 1 14
`
`A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this
`
`application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action
`
`has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on
`
`03/13/2017 has been entered.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`The amendments filed 03/13/20176 have been considered and are insufficient to
`
`overcome the Park and Tupper references.
`
`Claims 1-5 remain pending.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/365,706
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 3746
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis
`
`for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described
`as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to
`be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been
`obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which
`said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the
`invention was made.
`
`Claims 1-2 and 4-5 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Park et al (US Patent No. 8,844,317) in view of Tupper (US Patent
`
`NO. 3,038,765).
`
`Park teaches:
`
`limitations from claim 1, a sealed compressor comprising: an electric component
`
`(100) including a stator (110) and a rotor (120) which is rotatable with respect to
`
`the stator; a compression component (200) activated by the electric component;
`
`and a sealed container (1) accommodating the electric component and the
`
`compression component (see FIG. 1); wherein the compression component
`
`includes: a vertical shaft (220) including a main shaft (221) fastened to the rotor,
`
`an eccentric shaft (223) which is eccentric with respect to the main shaft, and a
`
`flange (222) connecting the main shaft and the eccentric shaft to each other; a
`
`cylinder block (210) including a main bearing (212 see FIG. 2) supporting the
`
`main shaft such that the main shaft is rotatable, and a cylinder (211) having a
`
`compression chamber inside thereof; a piston (240) which is coupled to the
`
`eccentric shaft and is reciprocatable within the compression chamber; and a ball
`
`bearing (300) placed between the flange and a thrust surface of the main
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/365,706
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 3746
`
`bearing; wherein the ball bearing includes: a cage (310); a plurality of rolling
`
`elements (320) held in the cage; a first race (420) and a second race (410) which
`
`sandwich the rolling elements therebetween in a direction parallel to an axial
`
`direction of the main shaft (see FIG. 1); and an elastic support member (600)
`
`placed between the second race and the thrust surface of the main bearing in a
`
`direction parallel to an axial direction of the main shaft (see FIG. 1);
`
`Park does not teach a relationship between the rotor mass, spring constant, and
`
`rotational frequency;
`
`Tupper teaches:
`
`limitations from claim 1, an electric motor (FIG. 1) driving a shaft and rotor (9, 6),
`
`including a thrust bearing (10, 11) with springs (24, 25); and wherein when a
`
`mass of a shaft assembly including the rotor and the shaft is M, a spring constant
`
`of the support member is K, and a maximum rotational frequency of the
`
`shaft assembly is F, a relationship of F < (1/4 'IT) * (K/M) 0.5 is satisfied (Tupper
`
`teaches in FIG. 5 and C. 6 Lines 33-54 that the relationship between mass,
`
`frequency, and spring constant be chosen within desired ranges in order to
`
`prevent the transmission of harmonics and forces in order to damp the motor);
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of compressors at
`
`the time of the invention to choose a mass, frequency, and spring in the
`
`compressor of Park using the equation of claim 1, as suggested by Tupper, in
`
`order to control the transmissibility of the bearing and the forces damped by the
`
`bearing (see C. 7 Lines 1-56 of Tupper disclosing various considerations and the
`
`effective results of designing the bearing assembly while considering the
`
`elements of the claimed equation).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/365,706
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 3746
`
`Park and Tupper disclose and teach of the compressor in claim 1 ;
`
`Park further teaches:
`
`limitations from claim 2, wherein the support member (600) is an annular wave
`
`washer (see FIG. 2); and wherein the wave washer is configured to include a
`
`plurality of convex portions protruding in a thickness direction toward the second
`
`race and a plurality of convex portions protruding in the thickness direction
`
`toward the thrust surface of the main bearing such that the convex portion
`
`protruding toward the second race and the convex portion protruding toward the
`
`thrust surface are arranged alternately (FIG. 2; C. 6 Lines 20-26);
`
`limitations from claims 4-5, a compressor for a refrigerator (FIG. 6; C. 3 Lines 1-
`
`2) wherein the electric component is activated by one of a plurality of operation
`
`frequencies using an inverter power supply which adjusts a frequency of electric
`
`power supplied to the electric component (see C. 3 Lines 25-30 teaching an
`
`inverter motor);
`
`Claim 3 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Park et al (US Patent No. 8,844,317) in view of Tupper (US Patent No. 3,038,765) as
`
`applied to claim 1 above, and in further view of Duescher (US Patent No. 6,607,157).
`
`Park does not teach a specific diameter or thickness of the washer 415;
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/365,706
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 3746
`
`Duescher teaches:
`
`limitations from claim 3, a thrust bearing for a shaft, wherein a wave washer is
`
`formed of a spring steel; and wherein when a diameter of the main shaft is d and
`
`a thickness of the wave washer is t, 0.1d < t < 0.3d is satisfied (C. 23 Lines 55-63
`
`describes the relationship between the diameter of a spring washer and its
`
`thickness);
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of bearings at the
`
`time of the invention to choose a diameter and thickness of the bearing spring in
`
`Park, using the equation of claim 1, as a matter of routine optimization in order to
`
`control an axial force on the shaft of the compressor (see C. 23 Lines 56-58 of
`
`Duescher);
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-5 have been considered but are
`
`moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in the
`
`current rejection.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER BOBISH whose telephone number is
`
`(571 )270-5289. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday, 9-5.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/365,706
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 3746
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Devon Kramer can be reached on (571 )272—71 18. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272—1000.
`
`/CHRISTOPHER BOBISH/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 3746
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket