throbber
vs! “111%
`\.\_:
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`wwwusptogov
`
`
`
`
`
`14/3 87,160
`
`09/22/2014
`
`Tomoaki Takemura
`
`2014— 1274A
`
`6645
`
`52349
`7590
`03’0””
`WENDEROTH,LIND&PONACK L.L.P. —
`1030 15th Street, NW.
`BAYAT, ALI
`Suite 400 East
`
`Washington, DC 20005 - 1503
`
`ART UNIT
`2666
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`03/03/2015
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`ddalecki @wenderoth.c0m
`e0a@ wenderoth.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 14/387,160 TAKEMURA ET AL.
`
`
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Art Unit
`Examiner
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`ALI BAYAT its“ 2666
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 9/22/2014.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)|ZI This action is non-final.
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`3)|:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) fl) is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`6)IXI Claim(s) 1-8 and 10 is/are allowed.
`7)|Z| Claim(s)_9 is/are rejected.
`
`8)|:I Claim(s)_ is/are objected to.
`* If any)claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`
`
`()
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`
`
`I/AWIIV‘LUSDIO. ovI’ atentS/init events/
`iindex.‘s orsend an inquiry to PPI-iieedback{®usgtc.00v.
`
`hit
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)IZI The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)|Xl The drawing(s) filed on 9/22/2014 is/are: a)lX| accepted or b)|:l objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)IXI Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)IZl All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.IXI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) E InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date 9/22/2014.
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20150221
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/387,160
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2666
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre—AIA first to invent provisions.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Specification
`
`Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the
`
`disclosure.
`
`The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a
`separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words. The form and legal phraseology often
`used in patent claims, such as "means" and "said," should be avoided. The abstract
`should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a
`need for consulting the full patent text for details.
`The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the
`title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, "The disclosure
`concerns," "The disclosure defined by this invention," "The disclosure describes," etc.
`
`The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because of numerical numbering, which
`
`refers to Figures. Correction is required. See MPEP § 608.0l(b).
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101
`
`35 USC. 101 reads as follows:
`
`Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or
`composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent
`therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.
`
`Claim 9 is rejected under 35 USC. 101 because the claimed invention is directed
`
`to non—statutory subject matter. Claim 9 defines a surgery assistance program or
`
`(computer software). However computer software is not statutory by itself,
`
`because it is not (processes machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter),
`
`a surgery assistance program becomes statutory, when software code is encoded
`
`(stored) on a non—transitory computer readable storage medium or (a computer
`
`storage device).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/387,160
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2666
`
`Examiner suggestion “A surgery assistance program stored in a memory to
`
`perform navigation while displaying a three—dimensional simulation image
`
`produced from tomographic image information...”
`
`Allowed Claims
`
`Claims 1—8 and 10 are allowed.
`
`Reasons for Allowance
`
`The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the
`
`closest prior art of Imanaka et al. (Pub.No: US 20120032959 A1), relates to
`
`surgical simulation can be performed merely by moving an input section in a
`
`planar fashion, without issuing resection instructions while looking at a 3D
`
`display, so a benefit is that good surgical simulation can be carried out .see
`
`[0068].
`
`Imanaka failed to teach or suggest for a tomographic image information
`
`acguisition section configured to acguire tomographic image information about a
`
`patient; a memog that is connected to the tomographic image information
`
`acguisition section and configured to store voxel information for the tomographic
`
`image information; a volume rendering computer that is connected to the memory
`
`and configured to sample voxel information in a direction perpendicular to the
`
`sight line on the basis of the voxel information; an endoscope/surgical instrument
`
`position sensor configured to seguentially sense the three—dimensional positions
`
`of the endoscope and the surgical instrument; a registration computer configure to
`
`integrate the coordinates of a three—dimensional image produced by the volume
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/387,160
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2666
`
`rendering computer and the coordinates of the endoscope and the surgical
`
`instrument sensed by the endoscope/surgical instrument position sensor; a
`
`simulator configured to store the resection portion scheduled for surgery and
`
`Virtually resected on the three—dimensional image produced by the volume
`
`rendering computer; in the memory after associating it with the voxel information;
`
`a distance calculator configured to calculate a distance between the working end
`
`of the surgical instrument on the three—dimensional image and the voxel
`
`information indicating the resection portion and stored in the memory; and
`
`a navigator configured to display the working end of the surgical
`
`instrument on the three— dimensional image by using the coordinates of the
`
`surgical instrument during surgery; and display the distance between the working
`
`end and the voxel information indicating the resection portion stored in the
`
`memory; along with the endoscopic image displayed during surgery. As cited in
`
`claims 1 and 10.
`
`Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no
`
`later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should
`
`preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled
`
`“Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.”
`
`Contact Information
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications
`
`from the examiner should be directed to ALI BAYAT whose telephone number is
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/387,160
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2666
`
`(571)272—7444. The examiner can normally be reached on M—F 9:00 AM—5:00
`
`PM.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the
`
`examiner’s supervisor, Kim Vu can be reached on 571—272—3859. The fax phone
`
`number for the organization Where this application or proceeding is assigned is
`
`571-273—8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from
`
`the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information
`
`for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public
`
`PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through
`
`Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair—
`
`direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR
`
`system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866—217—9197 (toll—free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or
`
`access to the automated information system, call 800—786—9199 (IN USA OR
`
`CANADA) or 57 1—272— 1000.
`
`/ALI BAYAT/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2666
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/387,160
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2666
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket