`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`
`
` . ae . 14/007,681 YAMAMOTO, MASAHIRO
`
`Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`
`
`
`
`
`IBRAHIME A. ABRAHAM
`
`1756
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant’s representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) JBRAHIME A. ABRAHAM.
`
`(2) Andy Coatman.
`
`Date of Interview: 79 October 2015.
`
`Type:
`
`[-] Video Conference
`[X Telephonic
`[-] Personal [copy given to:[] applicant
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`.
`
`.
`
`[J] applicant’s representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`[] Yes
`
`IX] No.
`
`[101 112 [102 (103 [Others
`Issues Discussed
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 1-16.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed:
`
`Substance of Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics mayinclude: identification or clarification of a
`reference or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied referencesetc...)
`
`Examiner requested explanation of claimed limitations with regards to amended sinqular claimed points that reference
`to multiple lines.
`
`Applicant provided summaryof the disclosed invention. Applicant could not relate the claimed limitations to the
`intended invention or how to interpret the claimedlimitations to render them definite. Applicant informed examiner that
`claims would need to be amended with quidance of the inventor upon receipt of the next office action. .
`
` U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Applicantrecordation instructions:
`
`It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substanceofinterview.
`
`Examinerrecordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of
`the substance of an interview should includethe items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the
`general thrust of each argumentor issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the
`general results or outcomeof the interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached onthe issues raised.
`
`[] Attachment
`/IBRAHIME A ABRAHAM/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1756
`
`PTOL-413B (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20151019
`
`