`“x
`‘\\f
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`14/764,745
`
`07/30/2015
`
`Shigeki NAKAMURA
`
`WASH1—548 16
`
`8201
`
`03’09’2018 —PEARNE&GORDON LLP m
`7590
`52054
`1801 EAST 9TH STREET
`WILBERT’ DAVID S
`S UITE 1 200
`CLEVELAND, OH 441 14-3 108
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`2899
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`03/09/2018
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`patdocket @ pearne.c0m
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 14/764,745 NAKAMURA ET AL.
`
`
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Art Unit
`Examiner
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`David s. Wilbert its“ 2899
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 12/19/2017.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)|ZI This action is non-final.
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) 1-3,5 and 6 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`is/are allowed.
`6)I:I Claim(s)
`7)|Z| Claim(s) 1--3,5 and6is/are rejected.
`8)|:I Claim(s)_ is/are objected to.
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`9)I:I Claim((s)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`hit
`:/'I’wvvw.usnto. ovI’ atentS/init events/
`
`
`
`iv’index.‘s or send an inquiry to PPI-iieedback{®usgtc.00v.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:l The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)|Xl The drawing(s) filed on 07/30/2015 is/are: a)IXI accepted or b)|:l objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)IXI Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)IZl All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.IXI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) I] InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20180302
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/764,745
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2899
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre—AIA first to invent provisions.
`
`Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
`
`A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in
`
`37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is
`
`eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR l.l7(e)
`
`has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to
`
`37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/19/2017 has been entered.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`Claims 1—3, 5, and 6 are pending.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 USC. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not
`identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed
`invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious
`before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to
`which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the
`invention was made.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/764,745
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2899
`
`Claims 1-3 and 6 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 1031a) as being unpatentable
`
`over Koizumi (US 2003/0164887) in view of Umezaki (US 2008/0079001).
`
`Regarding claim 1, Koizumi discloses a semiconductor apparatus (see Figs. 5 and 7)
`
`comprising:
`
`a semiconductor substrate (101, Fig. 5);
`
`a plurality of semiconductor devices (104, 108, 109, and 111) including a first
`
`semiconductor device (104, 108, or 109) and a second semiconductor device (111), the
`
`plurality of semiconductor devices being provided on (see Fig. 5) a first surface (top
`
`surface of 101) of the semiconductor substrate, and configured to output a signal (109
`
`and 111 are transistors which necessarily have an output and are therefore configured to
`
`output a signal; see paragraph [0050]);
`
`a plurality of signal lines (105 and 212) including a first signal line (212) and a second
`
`line (105), each of the plurality of signal lines being provided on (see Figs. 5 and 7) the
`
`semiconductor substrate, connected with (see Figs. 5 and 7) a corresponding
`
`semiconductor devices, and configured to propagate the signal outputted from (see
`
`paragraph [0050]) the corresponding semiconductor device; wherein:
`
`a trench—type insulation region (portions of 213 surrounding108, 109, and 111 as seen in
`
`Fig. 5 and 12 are insulation regions and appear to be trench—type) is provided in (see Figs.
`
`5 and 12) the semiconductor substrate, the trench—type insulation region surrounding (see
`
`Figs. 5 and 12) the first semiconductor device with at least a single surrounding structure
`
`(single surrounding portion of 213 as seen in Figs. 5 and 12), the first semiconductor
`
`device being connected with (see Fig. 7) the first signal line (212),
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/764,745
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2899
`
`a first region (portion of 101 to right of, and including, portion of 10loverlapped by right
`
`half of 105) where the first signal line is provided on the semiconductor substrate is
`
`covered by (see Fig. 5) a polysilicon layer (211; and see paragraph [0122] which recites
`
`211 is made of polysilicon),
`
`a second region (portion of 101 to left of, and including, portion of 10loverlapped by left
`
`half of 105) where the first signal line (212) is provided on (see Figs. 5 and 7) the
`
`semiconductor substrate is covered by (see Fig. 5) the second semiconductor device
`
`(1 1 1), and
`
`the polysilicon layer is provided along (see Fig. 7) the first signal line (212) and is not
`
`provided along (see Fig. 7 which shows 211 is not provided along 105) the second signal
`
`line (105).
`
`Koizumi fails to explicitly disclose the first signal line is diverged to extend in multiple
`
`directions, each of the multiple directions in which the first signal line extends being different
`
`from a direction in which the second signal line extends.
`
`Umezaki teaches a semiconductor apparatus (see Fig. 29).
`
`Umezaki additionally teaches the first signal line (506, Fig. 29) is diverged (see Fig. 29)
`
`to extend in multiple directions (directions corresponding to left to right and down to up as seen
`
`in Fig. 29), each of the multiple directions in which the first signal line extends being different
`
`from (see Fig. 29) a direction (direction corresponding to up to down as seen in Fig. 29) in which
`
`the second signal line (501) extends.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing
`
`date of the claimed invention to further modify the device of Koizumi such that the first signal
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/764,745
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2899
`
`line is diverged to extend in multiple directions, each of the multiple directions in which the first
`
`signal line extends being different from a direction in which the second signal line extends as
`
`taught by Umezaki.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to incorporate the teaching of
`
`Umezaki in order to improve the device fabrication procedure by selectively placing the signal
`
`lines to more efficiently be connected to signal supply sources.
`
`The device of Koizumi as modified by Umezaki teaches the claimed invention except for
`
`“the polysilicon layer being provided between the semiconductor substrate and the first signal
`
`line”. However, Koizumi teaches the polysilicon layer should separate/shield the first signal line
`
`and the second signal line from each other. As such, it appears that the placement of the first
`
`signal line (212) below the polysilicon layer (211) with the second signal line (105) being above
`
`the polysilicon layer in the device of Koizumi was a matter of design choice. It would have been
`
`obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention
`
`to reverse the order of the first signal line, the polysilicon layer, and the second signal line as a
`
`matter of design choice which would result in “the polysilicon layer being provided between the
`
`semiconductor substrate and the first signal line”, since it has been held that rearranging parts of
`
`an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70.
`
`Regarding claim 2, the device of Koizumi as modified by Umezaki teaches the
`
`semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1.
`
`Koizumi additionally teaches wherein the polysilicon layer (211, Fig. 5) has a width that
`
`is greater than (see Fig. 7) at least a width of the signal line (212).
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/764,745
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2899
`
`Regarding claim 3, the device of Koizumi as modified by Umezaki teaches the
`
`semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1.
`
`Koizumi additionally teaches wherein the polysilicon layer (211, Figs. 5 and 7) is
`
`provided in a region other than (see Figs. 5 and 7) a region where the plurality of semiconductor
`
`devices (104, 108, 109, and 111) are provided.
`
`Regarding claim 6, the device of Koizumi as modified by Umezaki teaches the
`
`semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1.
`
`Koizumi additionally teaches wherein the semiconductor substrate (101, Fig. 5) is
`
`composed of a material of a single resistivity (see paragraph [0053] which recites 101 is n—type),
`
`or a plurality of layers having different resistivities (by an alternative interpretation of Koizumi
`
`when 102 is included as being part of the substrate 101; see paragraph [0053] which recites 102
`
`is a p—type region).
`
`Claim 5 rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 1031a] as being unpatentable over Koizumi
`
`in view of Umezak, and in further view of Anderson (US 2008/0278542).
`
`Regarding claim 5, the device of Koizumi as modified by Umezaki teaches the
`
`semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1.
`
`Koizumi fails to explicitly disclose wherein a guard ring is provided in the semiconductor
`
`substrate such that the guard ring surrounds at least one of the plurality of semiconductor devices
`
`with at least a single surrounding structure.
`
`Anderson teaches a semiconductor apparatus (see Figs. 6A—J).
`
`Anderson additionally teaches wherein a guard ring (see paragraph [0053]) is provided in
`
`the semiconductor substrate (10) such that the guard ring surrounds (see paragraph [0053]) at
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/764,745
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 2899
`
`least one of the plurality of semiconductor devices (either 18 or 46) with at least a single
`
`surrounding structure (see paragraph [0053]).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing
`
`date of the claimed invention to further modify the device of Koizumi such that a guard ring is
`
`provided in the semiconductor substrate such that the guard ring surrounds at least one of the
`
`plurality of semiconductor devices with at least a single surrounding structure as taught by
`
`Anderson.
`
`One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to incorporate the teaching of
`
`Anderson in order to improve device performance by increasing the breakdown voltage or
`
`lowering leakage current (see Anderson paragraph [0053]).
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant’s arguments, filed 12/19/2017, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1
`
`under 35 USC 103 regarding the device of Koizumi failing to teach all of the newly added
`
`limitations of amended claim 1 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the
`
`rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of
`
`rejection is made in view of Umezaki.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to David S. Wilbert whose telephone number is 571—272—401 1. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday 7:30 to 17:00 EST.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/764,745
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 2899
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571—270—7877. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization Where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571—273—8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR
`
`system, see http://pair—direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR
`
`system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866—217—9197 (toll—free). If you would
`
`like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated
`
`information system, call 800—786—9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571—272—1000.
`
`/David S Wilbert/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 2899
`
`/Su C. Kim/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
`
`