`
`V i$ T
`{5%
`
`A
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`14/818,415
`
`08/05/2015
`
`ShOgO OKITA
`
`PIPMM-54878
`
`8557
`
`759°
`52°“
`PEARNE & GORDON LLP
`
`05/17/2019
`
`1801 EAST 9TH STREET
`SUITE 1200
`
`CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108
`
`FORD NATHAN K
`
`1716
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/ 17/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`patdoeket@pearne.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`0/7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`14/818,415
`Examiner
`NATHAN K FORD
`
`Applicant(s)
`OKITA etal.
`Art Unit
`1716
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 8/30/18.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)
`Claim(s)
`
`1—7 and 9—16 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s) fl is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) 4—7 and 9—16 is/are rejected.
`
`E] Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[:1 Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.'sp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10):] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 8/5/15 is/are: a). accepted or b)C] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)|:] Some**
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.|:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) D Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`Other' PTO—2297
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190318
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/818,415
`Art Unit: 1716
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Applicant’s Response
`
`In view of the arguments accompanying the pre-appeal brief request for review filed on August 30, 2018, the
`
`previous rejections have been withdrawn. In view of further search, however, new rejections have been applied below.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C.112(f):
`
`Claim Interpretation
`
`(f) Element in Claim for a Combination. — An element in a claim for a combination maybe expressedas a means or
`step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and
`such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification
`and equivalents thereof.
`
`This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word ”means," but are nonetheless being
`
`interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) because the claim limitations use a generic placeholder — ”section” and ”mechanism,”
`
`in this case — that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited
`
`function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structuralmodifier. Such claim limitations are:
`
`0 The ”position measuring section” of claims 4-5, 7, and 10;
`
`o The ”transport mechanism” of claims 10 and 11.
`
`Because these claim limitation(s) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f), they are being interpreted to cover
`
`the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof.
`
`The “position measuring section” will be interpreted to encompass at least a rotatable measuring stage (301) and
`
`a sensor (302) in accordance with paragraph [0065] of the pre -grant publication.
`
`The ”transport mechanism” will be interpreted to encompass at least a fork (201) and an arm (202) in accordance
`
`with paragraph [0045] of the pre-grant publication.
`
`If applicant does not intend to have these limitations interpreted under 35 U.S.C.112(f), applicant may: (1) amend
`
`the claim limitation(s) to avoid them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to
`
`perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitations recite sufficient structure
`
`to perform the claimed function so as to avoid them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C.112(f).
`
`Lastly, although ”plasma processing section” uses a nonce term, the limitation will not be interpreted under 112(f)
`
`because the claims 4 and 11 proceed to elaborate at least a portion of its structural content, e.g., a processing stage.
`
`Further, the ”position measuring section,” as recited by claim 11, will not be interpreted under 112(f) because, unlike
`
`claim 4, claim 11 recites at least a portion of its structural content, i.e., a measuring stage.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/818,415
`Art Unit: 1716
`
`Page 3
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this
`
`Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimedinventionmay not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimedinvention is not identically
`disclosed as set forthin section 102 of this title, if the differencesbetween the claimedinvention and the prior art are
`such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed
`invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentabilityshall not
`be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 4-7 and 9-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.103 as being unpatentable over Ansell et al., US 2014/0352889, in
`
`view of Senda et al., JP 2006-269915, wherein machine translation is relied upon.
`
`Claims 4, 7, 9, 12, 15-16: Ansell discloses a method of applying plasma processing to a substrate (24) held on a
`
`transport carrier. The transport carrier includes a frame (44) and a holding sheet (42) that covers an opening of the
`
`frame (Fig. 2). Ansell initiates plasma processing subsequent the carrier’s loading onto a processing stage (26) disp osed
`
`in a plasma processing section (40). The processing section includes a cover (28) which shrouds both the frame (44) and
`
`a portion of the holding sheet (42) so as to expose the substrate from a window section formed by cover’s circumference
`
`[0051].
`
`As depicted by Figure 2, the transport carrier is loaded such that the center of the substrate aligns with the center
`
`of the window section. Ansell, though, is silent regarding the claimed step of ”measuring a position of the substrate
`
`with respect to the frame.” In supplementation, Senda discloses a system which accommodates workpieces of the same
`
`type as Ansell — substrates affixed adhesively to a transport carrier. This citation, though, recognizes the contingency
`
`in which the substrate may adhere imperfectly to the carrier, i.e., the substrate’s center may not align with the carrier’s
`
`center [0001]. Insuchinstances, subsequent alignment operations premised uponthe centering of the carrier alone will
`
`induce an eccentric alignment of the misplaced substrate [0007]. As a remedy, Senda prescribes a measuring step
`
`performed in a position measuring section. The position measuring section includes both a rotatable stage and a sens or,
`
`which are used to assess the position of the substrate with respect to the carrier, thereby enabling direct discovery of
`
`the substrate’s position [0011]. Availing this data, ensuing alignment operations will be able to accurately locate and
`
`position the substrate’s central axis. Given that Ansell intends to align the central axes of the substrate and window
`
`section, it would have been obvious to integrate Senda’s measuring technique within Ansell’s processing method to
`
`promote this desideratum.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/818,415
`Art Unit: 1716
`
`Page4
`
`Lastly, as shown by Figure 2 of Ansell, the cover (28) circumscribes the frame (44) such that margins obtain on either
`
`side of the latter, thereby enabling lateral shifting of the transport carrier given the contingency of a misaligned
`
`substrate.
`
`Claims 5, 13: This limitation would be inherently satisfiedin the case of a substrate whose deviation is so severe its
`
`transfer to the plasma processing stage is structurally foreclosed. Further, Senda identifies ranges of tolerance [0061].
`
`Claims 6, 14: Senda determines substrate deviation during arotation of the carrier [0055].
`
`Claims 10-11: The rejection of claim 4, above, substantially addresses these limitations. In addition, regarding the
`
`recitation of a ”transp ort mechanism," Figure 1 of Senda limns a transfer robot (3) comprising an arm (2) and an end
`
`effector, the latter of which is taken as a functional equivalent of a fork, per the 112(f) analysis, above.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to
`
`NATHAN K FORD whose telephone number is (571)270-1880. The examiner can normally be reached on 11-7230 PM
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Parviz Hassanzadeh, can
`
`be reached at 571 272 1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned
`
`is 571 273 8300.
`
`/N. K. F./
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 1716
`
`/PARV|Z HASSANZADEH/
`
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1716
`
`