www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`
`14/909,394
`
`02/01/2016
`
`MASAYOSHI KOIZUMI
`
`PIPMB-56127
`
`1042
`
`759°
`52°“
`PEARNE & GORDON LLP
`
`01/25/2019
`
`1801 EAST 9TH STREET
`SUITE 1200
`
`CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108
`
`VU~ TOAN T
`
`2836
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`01/25/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`patdoeket@pearne.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Off/09 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`14/909,394
`Examiner
`TOAN T VU
`
`Applicant(s)
`KOIZUMI et al.
`Art Unit
`2836
`
`AIA Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 11/20/2018.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a). This action is FINAL.
`
`2b) C] This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)
`Claim(s)
`
`1—10 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 2 and 7-8 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) 1,3—6 and 9—10 is/are rejected.
`
`C] Claim(s) _
`
`is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[:1 Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.'sp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10):] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 2/01/2016 is/are: a). accepted or b)l:] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)|:] Some”
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`21:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) E] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190115
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/909,394
`Art Unit: 2836
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Applicant’s response filed on 11/20/2018 has been entered and considered.
`
`Upon entering claims 1, 8 have been amended and claim 10 has been added.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`1.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148
`
`USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining
`
`obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
`
`4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating
`
`obviousness or nonobviousness.
`
`2.
`
`Claims 1, 2 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over lchikawa (2013/0313893, previously cited), in view of in view of Maikawa et al
`
`(WO2014/087889, IDS).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/909,394
`Art Unit: 2836
`
`Page 3
`
`Regarding claim 1, Ichikawa discloses a wireless power receiving device [200,
`
`fig. 1] for receiving power wirelessly [par 0032], comprising: a resonant circuit [210]
`
`including a power receiving coil [230, fig. 1] and a resonant capacitor [220] for receiving
`
`power from a power feeding coil [140, fig. 1]; and a phase adjustment circuit [250] that is
`
`provided at a rear stage of the resonant circuit [see fig. 1].
`
`Ichikawa does not explicitly disclose the phase adjustment circuit adjusts a phase
`
`difference between a power feeding coil current and a power receiving coil current at a
`
`specific frequency so as to reinforce magnetic flux in a direction perpendicular to the
`
`surface where the power feeding coil is placed and to cancel the magnetic flux in a
`
`direction parallel to the surface where the power feeding coil is placed.
`
`However, Maikawa discloses the phase adjustment circuit adjusts a phase
`
`difference between a power feeding coil current and a power receiving coil current at a
`
`specific frequency so as to reinforce magnetic flux in a direction perpendicular to the
`
`surface where the power feeding coil is placed and to cancel the magnetic flux in a
`
`direction parallel to the surface where the power feeding coil is placed [see fig. 3, par
`
`0036-0040]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the
`
`effective filling date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Maikawa into
`
`the receiver device of Ichikawa in order to provide with maximum power transfer and
`
`more efficient when the coupling coefficient between transmitter and receiver is not
`
`efficient.
`
`Regarding claim 3, further Ichikawa discloses wherein the phase adjustment
`
`circuit [250A, fig. 11] is an inductor [126] connected in series with the power receiving
`
`coil [230, see fig.
`
`1 (power coil 230 coupled series with matching device 250)].
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/909,394
`Art Unit: 2836
`
`Page 4
`
`Regarding claim 4, Ichikawa discloses wherein the phase adjustment circuit
`
`includes a relay for switching operation of the phase adjustment circuit [see fig. 11, par
`
`0109j
`
`Regarding claim 5, Ichikawa further discloses wherein the relay is switched to
`
`operate the phase adjustment circuit when the specific frequency is used as a drive
`
`frequency [par 0100-0101].
`
`Regarding claim 6, the combination of Ichikawa and Maikawa further discloses
`
`wherein the relay is switched [par 0109: Ichikawa], based on a phase difference
`
`between the power feeding coil current and the power receiving coil current, to operate
`
`the phase adjustment circuit [abstract, par 0010; Maikawa].
`
`Regarding claim 9, further Ichikawa and Maikawa discloses wherein the power
`
`feeding coil and the power receiving coil can be a solenoid coil [see fig. 3, Maikawa] or
`
`a spiral coil [figs. 1, 3, Ichikawa].
`
`Regarding claim 10, further Maikawa discloses wherein the surface where the
`
`power feeding coil is placed is a ground surface [par 0013].
`
`Conclusion
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure. Please see PTO-892.
`
`The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of
`
`record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicant. Although the
`
`specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the
`
`specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply.
`
`Applicant, in preparing the response, should consider fully the entire reference as
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/909,394
`Art Unit: 2836
`
`Page 5
`
`potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the
`
`passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner.
`
`In the case of amending the claimed invention, Applicant is respectfully
`
`requested to indicate the portion(s) of the specification which dictate(s) the structure
`
`relied on for proper interpretation and also to verify and ascertain the metes and bounds
`
`of the claimed invention
`
`Therefore, in order to expedite the prosecution of this application, the examiner
`
`recommends the applicant to amend the claims by including structural components that
`
`are different from the prior art applied in order to distinguish the claim invention from the
`
`prior art of record.
`
`Note to Applicant Regarding Claim Interpretation: the words "configured to," "for,"
`
`and " adapted to" in an apparatus claim, as recited in his case, is often indicative of
`
`intended use/functional language and does not require that reference explicitly teach
`
`the intended use of the element. A recitation of intended use must result in a structural
`
`difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably
`
`distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of
`
`performing the intended use, hence it meets the claim.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/909,394
`Art Unit: 2836
`
`Page 6
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to TOAN T VU whose telephone number is (571 )270-1 723.
`
`The examiner can normally be reached on M-T: 7-5.30.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached on 571 -272—7492. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 14/909,394
`Art Unit: 2836
`
`Page 7
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786—9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272-1000.
`
`/TOAN VU/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 2836
`
`/REXFORD N BARNIE/
`
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2836
`
`