throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`
`15/120,871
`
`53148
`
`08/23/2016
`
`Sadayuki YAMADA
`
`20296.0067USWO
`
`1439
`
`759°
`
`04/22/20”
`
`HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON RC.
`45 South Seventh Street
`Suite 2700
`
`MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683
`
`WAN'DEMING
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`3748
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`04/22/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`PTOMail@hsml.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`0/7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/120,871
`Examiner
`DEMING WAN
`
`Applicant(s)
`YAMADA et al.
`Art Unit
`3748
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 1/16/2019.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a). This action is FINAL.
`
`2b) C] This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are rejected.
`
`[:1 Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[j Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined aflowabie. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10)[:] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 8/23/2016 is/are: a). accepted or b)E] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)D Some**
`
`C)D None of the:
`
`1.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3.. Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) D Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190411
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`2.
`
`The amendment filed on 1/16/2019 has been entered. Claims 1-4 are pending and under
`
`consideration.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
`(b) CONCLUSION—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out
`and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the
`invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph:
`The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly
`claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as
`
`being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the
`
`inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention.
`
`In Reference to Claim 1
`
`The metes and bounds of claim 1 cannot be ascertained since ”a bypass check valve capable of
`
`blocking the bypass port” is indefinite and renders claim 1 ambiguous.
`
`If the Applicant considers that
`
`the recited function is a required limitation, is should be positively recited.
`
`In Reference to Claims 2-3
`
`Claims 2-3 are rejected by their virtue dependency to Claim 1.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`5.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102
`
`and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`Page 3
`
`basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and
`
`the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
`
`6.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections
`
`set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is
`not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention
`and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the
`claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention
`was made.
`
`7.
`
`Claims 1, 2 4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the Applicant
`
`provide prior art US Patent Publication 2013/0078128 to Akei in view of JP63235681 to Sato (The Art
`
`rejection is made based on the Espacenet translation), and further in view of US Patent 6,056,523 to
`
`Won et al (Won).
`
`In Reference to Claim 1
`
`Akei discloses a scroll compressor comprising:
`
`a partition plate (Fig. 1, 37) for partitioning a hermetic container into a high pressure
`
`space (Fig. 1, 42) and a low pressure space (Fig. 1, 20);
`
`a stationary scroll (Fig. 1, 62) abutting on the partition plate and including a stationary
`
`spiral lap;
`
`an orbiting scroll (Fig. 1, 64) including an orbiting spiral lap engaged with the stationary
`
`spiral lap of the stationary scroll, and forming a compressing chamber between the stationary
`
`spiral lap and the orbiting spiral lap;
`
`a self-rotation preventing member (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) for preventing
`
`the orbiting scroll from rotating; and
`
`a main bearing (fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) for supporting the orbiting scroll,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`Page 4
`
`wherein the stationary scroll, the orbiting scroll, the self-rotation preventing member,
`
`and the main bearing are disposed in the low pressure space (as showed in Fig. 1),
`
`wherein the stationary scroll is movable between the partition plate and the main
`
`bearing in an axial direction (Paragraph 32 of Akei, the fixed scroll has limited axial
`
`displacement)
`
`wherein the scroll compressor further comprises:
`
`a bearing-side engagement section (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) formed on the
`
`main bearing;
`
`a scroll-side engagement section (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) formed on the
`
`stationary scroll; and
`
`a pillar-shaped member (Fig. 1, 98), of which lower section is inserted into the bearing-
`
`side engagement section, and of which upper section is inserted into the scroll-side engagement
`
`section; and
`
`a boss section (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) formed on a top face of the stationary
`
`scroll, the boss section forming a discharge space (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) between
`
`the partition plate and the stationary scroll,
`
`wherein the discharge space (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) communicates with the
`
`high pressure space (Fig. 1, 42) via a second discharge port (Fig. 1, 39),
`
`wherein a lower end-face (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) of an engagement section
`
`between the pillar-shaped member and the scroll-side engagement section is located above (As
`
`annotated in Fig. 1, there is a step between the engagement lower end face and the spiral lower
`
`face, therefore, the lower end face of the engagement section is located above) a lap end-face
`
`of the stationary spiral lap in the axial direction,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`Page 5
`
`wherein a first discharge port (Fig. 2, 28) is formed at a center portion of the boss
`
`section and a bypass port (Fig. 2, 90/92) is provided near the first discharge port in the boss
`
`section, and
`
`wherein the first discharge port (Fig. 2, 28) and the bypass port (fig. 2, 90/92) allow the
`
`compressing chamber of the scroll compressor to communicate with the discharge space.
`
`Wherein a bypass check valve (Fig. 2, 136) and a bypass check-valve stopper (Fig. 2,
`
`annotated by the examiner, a portion of the wall performed as a stopper) are disposed in the
`
`discharge space.
`
`Akei does not teach the following but is taught by Sato:
`
`a V-shaped lead valve (Fig. 3, annotated by the examiner) that is used as a bypass check
`
`valve capable of blocking the bypass port (Fig. 3, 275a/b).
`
`It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill, in the art at the time of the invention, to
`
`modify the invention of Akei to incorporate teachings from Sato. Doing so, would result in the V shaped
`
`lead valve of Sato being configured to close the bypass ports, since Akei and Sato are in the same field of
`
`endeavor and Sato teaches a method of closing the bypass ports by virtue of the pressure difference
`
`(Col. 8, Line 50-55).
`
`The combination of Akei and Sato as applied to Claim 1 does not teach the following but is taught by
`
`Won:
`
`an inner wall of the stationary spiral lap is extended to a position near a tail end of the
`
`orbiting spiral lap (As showed in Fig, 32) for differentiating a trapping capacity of a first
`
`compressing chamber from a trapping capacity of a second compressing chamber, where the
`
`first compressing chamber is formed by the inner wall of the stationary spiral lap and an outer
`
`wall of the orbiting spiral lap, and the second compressing chamber is formed by an outer wall
`
`of the stationary spiral lap and an inner wall of the orbiting spiral lap.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`Page 6
`
`It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill, in the art at the time of the invention, to
`
`modify the combination of Akei and Sato as applied to Claim 1 to integrate teachings from Won. Doing
`
`so, would result the end to the stationary spiral lap being extended to a position near a tail end of the
`
`orbiting scroll. Both inventions of Akei and Won are in the same field of endeavor. Won taught that this
`
`arrangement is a conventional design (Col. 6, Line 15-19).
`
`
`
`
`
`' e3: mm r
`\$¥3\\3¥333¥$¥$¥§\§$$\.3
`\.\“
`
`
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`Page 7
`
`begs
`
`\x\.
`upper'eizw mmééekie
`gegfien
`
`
`
`”fate;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`£3 cemeressien
`
`t ‘
`.V>~:?§w' '
`Cfifi m be?“
`
`se§f¢etatien
`meme-ting
`
`member
`
`
`éawer esm‘é
`fees: 8:5
`engagemexs‘t
`
`.
`\_
`
`
`
`
`
`33
`
`wearing
`
`bgarifigefide
`eegagémem
`
`Fig. 3., Aime? annetateci $33; the examiner
`
`a step between the
`flower end face of
`engagement and the
`iap end face of the
`
`Fig. 1, Akei amctated by the examiner
`34
`
`
`
`
`stopper
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`In Reference to Claim 2
`
`Page 8
`
`Akei discloses an upper end-face (Fig. 1, annotated by the examiner) of the engagement
`
`section between the pillar-shaped member and the scroll-side engagement section is located
`
`below a lap bottom face of the stationary spiral lap in the axial direction (As showed in Fig. 1).
`
`In Reference to Claim 4
`
`Akei discloses the lower end-face of the engagement section between the pillar-shaped
`
`member and the scroll-side engagement section is located higher than the lap end-face of the
`
`stationary spiral lap in the axial direction by a height equal to or greater than 1/4 height of the
`
`stationary spiral lap. (As showed in Fig. 1)
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`1.
`
`Applicant's arguments filed 1/16/2019 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
`
`Starting on Page 6 of the argument filed on 1/16/2019, the Applicant argues that Akei does not
`
`teach or suggest a V-shaped lead valve. This is true. However, this argument is based on the
`
`amended Claim. This argument is moot in terms of the new ground of rejection.
`
`Conclusion
`
`2.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to DEMING WAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1410. The examiner can
`
`normally be reached on Mon-Thur: 8 am to 6 PM.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use
`
`the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`Mark Laurenzi can be reached on 571-270-7878. The fax phone number for the organization where this
`
`application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/120,871
`Art Unit: 3748
`
`Page 9
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application
`
`Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained
`
`from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available
`
`through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-
`
`direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer
`
`Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR
`
`CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`DEMING . WAN
`
`Examiner
`
`Art Unit 3748
`
`/DEMING WAN/
`Examiner, Art Unit 3748
`
`4/11/2019
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket