`Amendment dated: April 19, 2019
`Reply to Office Action dated February 1, 2019
`
`REMARKS/ARGUMENTS:
`
`Applicant thanks the Examiner for the careful consideration given the present
`
`application, and respectfully requests favorable reconsideration of the application in view
`
`of the comments set forth below.
`
`Claim 1 has been amended.
`
`Support for the amendments is provided,
`
`for
`
`example, in paragraphs [0050] and [0057] of the originally filed Specification. No new
`
`matter has been added.
`
`Specification
`
`The Specification was objected to because of informalities. Applicant has
`
`amended the Specification to obviate the objection. Accordingly, Applicant respectfully
`
`requests that the objection to the Specification be withdrawn.
`
`Claim Rejections 35 USC § 112 / Claim Interpretation
`
`Claims 1-4 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. §112(a), or pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. §112,
`
`first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. At least for the
`
`following reasons, the rejection is respectfully traversed.
`
`The Office action alleges that
`
`the specification fails to provide description
`
`regarding the structure of the “voltage application section”, “measurement section”,
`77
`“determination section”, and “control section. However, as described, for example in
`
`paragraph [0037], a voltage can be applied to the input terminal under the control of the
`
`control section,
`
`in paragraph [0052], the control section can apply a voltage between
`
`electrodes of the biosensor, in paragraphs [0062], [0069], and [0086], information can be
`
`displayed on the display through the control section, and in paragraphs [0074] and
`
`[0089], the control section can measure blood-sugar level on the basis of an electric
`
`current value.
`
`In view of these descriptions, one of ordinary skill in the art would have
`
`understood the “voltage application section”, “measurement section”, “determination
`
`Page 5 of 10
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
