throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/467,827
`
`03/23/2017
`
`TETSUYA YAMAMOTO
`
`731456.430C1
`
`2872
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panason1e (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`LINDENBAUM' ALAN LOUIS
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2466
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`01/24/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`US PTOeACtion @ SeedIP .Com
`
`pairlinkdktg @ seedip .eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Off/09 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/467,827
`Examiner
`ALAN L LINDEN BAUM
`
`Applicant(s)
`YAMAMOTO et al.
`Art Unit
`AIA Status
`2466
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 10 December 2018.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)
`Claim(s)
`
`12—29 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) 12—29 is/are rejected.
`
`[:1 Claim(s)
`
`is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[j Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined aflowabte. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10)[:] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11)[:] The drawing(s) filed on
`
`is/are: a)D accepted or b)l:] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)I:J Some”
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3.[:] Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) C] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) E] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190113
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 2
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`2.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
`
`(b) CONCLUSION—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out
`and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the
`invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph:
`The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly
`claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 12-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph,
`
`as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the
`
`inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 12 and 21 recite ”receiving a DCI
`
`and generating a DMRS for a PUSCH using a
`
`III
`combination of a cyclic shift and an orthogonal sequence based on the DC ; but claims 12 and 21 also
`
`recite ”the combination used for generating the DMRS is fixed and not dynamically changed by the DCI.”
`
`These two limitations conflict with each other. ”Receiving a DCI and generating a DMRS for a PUSCH
`
`using a combination of a cyclic shift and an orthogonal sequence based on the DCI” is interpreted as
`
`dynamically changing, by the DCI, the combination used for generating the DMRS. Even though the
`
`claim has been amended to recite an second conditional option where the DMRS is not fixed, the clause
`
`reciting that the DMRS is generated using the DCI still conflicts with the first conditional option where
`
`
`the DM RS [meaning the same DM RS that was recited to be generated earlier in the claim] is fixed.
`
`Accordingly, the claims are indefinite.
`
`5.
`
`For the purposes of Examiner, the limitation ”not dynamically changed by the DC
`
`III
`
`is interpreted
`
`to mean that the combination remains unchanged/fixed for a limited duration.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 3
`
`6.
`
`Dependent claims 13-20 and 22-29 are rejected because they depend from claims 12 and 21.
`
`7.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application
`for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as
`the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of
`the claimed invention.
`
`8.
`
`Claims 12-14, 17-23 and 26-29 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by
`
`Pajukoski et al. (US 2014/0254536).
`
`9.
`
`Regarding claim 12, Pajukoski discloses a communication device (Pajukoski, paragraph [0003],
`
`lines 1-3, MTC communication) comprising:
`
`10.
`
`a receiver, which, in operation, receives downlink control information (DCI) transmitted from a
`
`base station (Pajukoski, Fig. 1, eNodeB communicates with UE; paragraph [0046], lines 1-5, uplink
`
`resources signaled to a user device by RRC signaling or broadcasting);
`
`11.
`
`circuitry (Pajukoski, paragraph [0080], circuits), which, in operation that generates a
`
`demodulation reference signal (DMRS) for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) (Pajukoski,
`
`paragraph [0039], lines 1-3, DMRS for PUSCH; paragraph [0047], allocation may comprise DMRS SCI field
`
`indicating a spreading code and a cyclic shift orthogonal cover code used for generating a DMRS; user
`
`device may transmit on the PUSCH) using a combination of a cyclic shift and an orthogonal sequence
`
`(Pajukoski, paragraph [0047], lines 1-12, DMRS Cyclic Shift Indicator (CSI), indicating a spreading code
`
`and a cyclic shift orthogonal cover code (DM RS OCC); paragraph [0048], code division multiplexing)
`
`based on the DCI (Pajukoski, paragraph [0046], lines 1-5, uplink resources signaled to a user device by
`
`RRC signaling or broadcasting); and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 4
`
`12.
`
`a transmitter, which, in operation, transmits, to the base station, the PUSCH and the generated
`
`DMRS (Pajukoski, paragraph [0039], lines 1-3 DMRS for PUSCH transmitted in the uplink; paragraph
`
`[0047]),
`
`13.
`
`wherein when the communication device is configured in a coverage enhancement mode
`
`(Pajukoski, paragraph [0034], lines 1-5, MTC coverage enhancement), in which the PUSCH is allowed to
`
`be transmitted with repetitions spanning a plurality of subframes (Pajukoski, paragraph [0037], lines 1-9,
`
`subframe bundling, where a single transmission block repeated over 4 consecutive sub-frames), the
`
`combination used for generating the DMRS is fixed and not dynamically changed by the DCI (Pajukoski,;
`
`paragraph [0046]-[0047], dynamic DM RS resource allocation based on DCI may or may not occur; the
`
`Examiner defines the claimed ”coverage enhancement mode” to mean a mode where the DMRS is not
`
`changed when DCI is received), and
`
`14.
`
`when the communication device is not configured in the coverage enhancement mode, the
`
`combination used for generating the DMRS is dynamically changed by the DCI (Pajukoski, paragraph
`
`[0046], lines 1-5, uplink resources signaled to a user device by RRC signaling or broadcasting; paragraph
`
`[0047], lines 1-12, DM RS Cyclic Shift Indicator (CSI), indicating a spreading code and a cyclic shift
`
`orthogonal cover code (DM RS OCC); the Examiner defines the claimed ”coverage enhancement mode”
`
`to mean a mode where the DMRS is not changed when DCI is received).
`
`15.
`
`Regarding claim 13, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 12,
`
`wherein when the communication device is configured in the coverage enhancement mode (Pajukoski,
`
`paragraph [0034], lines 1-5, MTC coverage enhancement), the combination used for generating the
`
`DMRS is fixed by the DCI (Pajukoski, ; paragraph [0046], lines 1-5, uplink resources signaled to a user
`
`device by RRC signaling or broadcasting; paragraph [0047], lines 1-12, DMRS Cyclic Shift Indicator (CSI),
`
`indicating a cyclic shift orthogonal cover code (DM RS OCC); after being notified to the user device,
`
`information about cyclic shift and OCC for DM RS is used by the user device without being changed).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 5
`
`16.
`
`Regarding claim 14, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 12,
`
`wherein when the communication device is configured in the coverage enhancement mode (Pajukoski,
`
`paragraph [0034], lines 1-5, MTC coverage enhancement), the combination used for generating the
`
`DMRS is determined in advance between the communication device and the base station (Pajukoski, ;
`
`paragraph [0046], lines 1-5, uplink resources signaled to a user device by RRC signaling or broadcasting;
`
`paragraph [0047], lines 1-12, DM RS Cyclic Shift Indicator (CSI), indicating a cyclic shift orthogonal cover
`
`code (DM RS OCC); information about cyclic shift and OCC for DM RS is notified to the user device in
`
`advance of being used by the user device).
`
`17.
`
`Regarding claim 17, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 12,
`
`wherein when the communication device is configured in the coverage enhancement mode (Pajukoski,
`
`paragraph [0034], lines 1-5, MTC coverage enhancement), said circuitry, in operation, multiplies the
`
`PUSCH transmitted with repetitions spanning the plurality of subframes by one code sequence out of a
`
`plurality of code sequences (Pajukoski, paragraph [0047], lines 1-12, DMRS Cyclic Shift Indicator (CSI),
`
`indicating a cyclic shift orthogonal cover code (DM RS OCC); paragraph [0061], spreading extended over
`
`multiple subframes by applying a cover code between repeated subframes).
`
`18.
`
`Regarding claim 18, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 17,
`
`wherein said one code sequence is determined using a field for indicating the combination used for the
`
`DMRS in the DCI (Pajukoski, paragraph [0053], lines 1-18, DM RS CSI field).
`
`19.
`
`Regarding claim 19, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 18,
`
`wherein the plurality of code sequences are respectively associated with a plurality of values (Pajukoski,
`
`paragraph [0053], lines 1-18, CDM-based MTC format derived from MCS field value).
`
`20.
`
`Regarding claim 20, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 19,
`
`wherein the plurality of values indicated by bits constituting the field are respectively associated with a
`
`plurality of combinations of the code sequences, cyclic shifts, and orthogonal sequences (Pajukoski,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 6
`
`paragraph [0053], lines 1-18, CDM-based MTC format derived from MCS field value; paragraph [0054],
`
`field value indicated by bits).
`
`21.
`
`Claims 21-23 and 26-29 are rejected under substantially the same rationale as claims 12-14 and
`
`17-20.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`22.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections
`
`set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is
`not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, ifthe differences between the claimed invention
`and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the
`claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention
`was made.
`
`23.
`
`The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere C0,, 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966),
`
`that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are
`
`summarized as follows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
`
`4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or
`
`nonobviousness.
`
`24.
`
`Claims 15, 16, 24 and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Pajukoski in view of Takeda et al. (US 2015/0036651).
`
`25.
`
`Regarding claim 15, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 12,
`
`wherein when the communication device is configured in the coverage enhancement mode (Pajukoski,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 7
`
`paragraph [0034], lines 1-5, MTC coverage enhancement), said transmitter, in operation, transmits the
`
`PUSCH and the DM RS (Pajukoski, paragraph [0039], lines 1-3, DMRS for PUSCH).
`
`26.
`
`Takeda discloses that MTC communication occurs in a narrow band (Takeda, paragraph [0028],
`
`MTC communication in narrow band).
`
`It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the
`
`art, at the time of the invention, to use a narrow band for the MTC communication in the invention of
`
`Pajukoski. The motivation to combine the references would have been to use known methods for
`
`performing MTC communication.
`
`27.
`
`Regarding claim 16, Pajukoski discloses the communication device according to claim 12,
`
`wherein said transmitter, in operation, transmits the PUSCH and the DMRS (Pajukoski, paragraph [0039],
`
`lines 1-3, DM RS for PUSCH)
`
`28.
`
`Takeda discloses using a frequency hopping in a narrow band (Takeda, paragraph [0028], MTC
`
`communication in narrow band; paragraph [0039], hopping resources allocation).
`
`It would have been
`
`obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the invention, to use a narrow band and
`
`frequency hopping for the MTC communication in the invention of Pajukoski. The motivation to
`
`combine the references would have been to use known methods for performing MTC communication.
`
`29.
`
`Claims 24 and 25 are rejected under substantially the same rationale as claims 15 and 16.
`
`30.
`
`Applicant's arguments filed December 10, 2018 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`persuasive.
`
`31.
`
`Applicant asserts that the claims are not indefinite because the DMRS being fixed in one instant
`
`[period of time] does not preclude the DMRS being dynamically changing in another instant [period of
`
`time]. However, the claims do not clearly delineate that the second clause [reciting that the DMRS is
`
`generated using the DCI] is conditional and does not apply to the period of time in which the device is in
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 8
`
`coverage enhancement mode. Rather, the clause regarding the DM RS being fixed in the coverage
`
`enhancement mode recites ”the DMRS” and ”the DCI,” meaning that the same DCI is both used [in the
`
`second clause] and not used. This language is contradictory.
`
`In order to overcome this rejection, the
`
`claim should clearly delineate that the device is initially not in a coverage enhancement mode, when the
`
`DMRS is generated in the second clause, and then switched to a coverage enhancement mode for a
`
`subsequent time period.
`
`32.
`
`Applicant further asserts that the claims are patentable because Pajukoski does not disclose that
`
`the determination of whether or not to dynamically change the DMRS when DCI is received is linked to a
`
`determination of whether the device is in coverage enhancement mode. However, the Examiner
`
`defines the claimed ”coverage enhancement mode” to mean a mode where the DMRS is not changed
`
`when DCI is received. Further, the claims do not clearly recite such a link. Rather, the claims require
`
`that there is an instance where a DM RS is fixed that occurs when the device is in a coverage
`
`enhancement mode, and there is another instance where a DMRS is dynamically changed that occurs
`
`when the device is not in a coverage enhancement mode.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to ALAN LOUIS LINDENBAUM whose telephone number is (571)270-3858. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM EST.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use
`
`the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/467,827
`Art Unit: 2466
`
`Page 9
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`Faruk Hamza can be reached on (571) 272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this
`
`application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application
`
`Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained
`
`from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available
`
`through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-
`
`direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer
`
`Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR
`
`CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/A. L./
`Examiner, Art Unit 2466
`
`/FARUK HAMZA/
`
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2466
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket