`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`
`15/490,001
`
`04/18/2017
`
`YUJI NAKAMURA
`
`PIPMM-57437
`
`8765
`
`759°
`52°“
`PEARNE & GORDON LLP
`
`09/27/2019
`
`1801 EAST 9TH STREET
`SUITE 1200
`
`CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108
`
`SAAB ERIN BARRY
`
`1735
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`09/27/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`patdoeket@pearne.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`0/7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/490,001
`Examiner
`ERIN B SAAD
`
`Applicant(s)
`NAKAMURA, YUJI
`Art Unit
`AIA (FITF) Status
`1735
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 9/13/2019.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)
`Claim(s)
`
`1—16 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 13—16 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are rejected.
`
`E] Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[:1 Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.'sp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10):] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 4/18/2017 is/are: a). accepted or b)l:] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)|:] Some**
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`21:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190924
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/490,001
`Art Unit: 1735
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Election/Restrictions
`
`2.
`
`Applicant’s election without traverse of group I, claims 1-12 in the reply filed on
`
`9/13/2019 is acknowledged.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 1 12
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
`(b) CONCLUSION—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly
`pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor
`regards as the invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph:
`The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly
`claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA),
`
`second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly
`
`claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the
`
`applicant regards as the invention.
`
`5.
`
`Claim 1 states “wherein the timer measures time by weighting time for which the
`
`solder is moved on the screen mask by the squeegee or time for which the solder does
`
`not move on the screen mask”. What is meant by weighting? Weighting is defined as
`
`allowance or adjustment, but that does not appear to work as a definition in this
`
`instance. Does the Applicant intend to say ‘measuring time’? The current specification
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/490,001
`Art Unit: 1735
`
`Page 3
`
`does not give any indication as to what is meant by weighting. Since the Examiner
`
`does not understand what is meant by this limitation, for the purpose of examination it
`
`will be interpreted as ‘measuring’. The Examiner requests that the Applicant please
`
`clarify this limitation.
`
`6.
`
`Claim 2 is indefinite because it is unclear what is meant by “wherein hy
`
`weighting, the timer measures time as time sherter than aetuaiiy measured time for
`
`which the setder is moved en the screen mash by the squeegee”. As stated aheve, it is
`
`net understeed what is meant by ‘weighting’. Furthermere, new dees a timer measure
`
`time that is sherter than time measured? The Examiner dees net understand this
`
`iimitatien and requests that the Aepiieant etease eiariiy.
`
`7.
`
`Ciaim 3 is indefinite because it is net understeed what is rneant by “weighting a
`
`measurement intervai et‘ time". As stated aheve, it is net understand what is meant by
`
`“weighting”. Furthermere, hew does a timer measure an intervai at time se as in
`
`became greater than a measurement intervai et time tar which the seider dees net
`
`meve en the screen mask? A timer measures tirne. se hew dees it measure tirne se it
`
`heeemes greater than a different intervai? The Examiner dees not understand this
`
`iimitatien.
`
`8.
`
`Ciaim 8 is indefinite because it is unetear what is meant by “wherein the timer
`
`dees net measure the time ter which the seider is meved en the screen mask hy the
`
`squeegee due is the weighting. The Examiner dees net understand this timitatien at aii
`
`and requests that the Appiieant eiease eiarii‘y. Haw dees a timer net measure
`
`semething due te the weighting?
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/490,001
`Art Unit: 1735
`
`Page 4
`
`9.
`
`Claim 7 states “wherein the timer measures time by weighting time for which the
`
`solder is moved on the screen mask by the squeegee or time for which the solder does
`
`not move on the screen mask”. What is meant by weighting? Weighting is defined as
`
`allowance or adjustment, but that does not appear to work as a definition in this
`
`instance. Does the Applicant intend to say ‘measuring time’? The current specification
`
`does not give any indication as to what is meant by weighting. Since the Examiner
`
`does not understand what is meant by this limitation, for the purpose of examination it
`
`will be interpreted as ‘measuring’. The Examiner requests that the Applicant please
`
`clarify this limitation.
`
`10.
`
`Claim 8 is indefinite because it is unclear what is meant by “wherein hy
`
`weighting. the timer measures time as time sherter than aetuaiiy measured time ier
`
`which the seider is meved en the screen mask, by the squeegee”. As stated above, it is
`
`net understand what is meant by ‘weighting’. Furthermere, new dees a timer measure
`
`time that is sherter than time measured? The Examiner dees not understand this
`
`iimitatien and requests that the Apeiieant piease eiariiy.
`
`11.
`
`Cieim 9 is indefinite because it is net understeed what is meant by “weighting a
`
`measurement intervai at time”. As stated aheve; it is net understand what is meant by
`
`“weighting”. Furthermore, hew dees a timer measure an intervai of time as as to
`
`beeeme greater than a measurement intervai et time ier which the seider dees not
`
`move on the screen mask? A timer measures tirne. se new dees it measure tirne se it
`
`heeemes greater than a different iniervai’? The Examiner dries not understand this
`
`iimitatieh.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/490,001
`Art Unit: 1735
`
`Page 5
`
`12.
`
`Claim 12 is indefihite because it is unclear what is meant by “wherein the timer
`
`does not measure the time for which the solder is moved on the screeh mask by the
`
`squeegee due to the weighting”. The Examiher does not uricierstahd this iimitatiah at aii
`
`and requests that the Appiicaht piease clarify. How does a timer not measure
`
`something due to the weighting?
`
`13.
`
`Claims 1-12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), 2nd paragraph, set forth
`
`in this Office action. The Examiner would like to remind the Applicant that no new
`
`matter may be added to the claims.
`
`Conclusion
`
`14.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to ERIN B SAAD whose telephone number is (571 )270-
`
`3634. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 7:30a-6p.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached on 571 -272—3458. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/490,001
`Art Unit: 1735
`
`Page 6
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272-1 000.
`
`/ERIN B SAAD/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1735
`
`