throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMIVHSSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`15/052,224
`
`02/24/2016
`
`Takahiro NAGAMI
`
`1497—503 02CX2
`
`5891
`
`TYPHA IP LLC
`1819 L Street NW Suite 200
`
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`NGUYEN, HOAN C
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2871
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`10/20/2017
`
`PAPER NUIVIBER
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
` 15/052,224 NAGAMI, TAKAHIRO
`
`
`AIA (First Inventor to File)
`Art Unit
`Examiner
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`HOAN c. NGUYEN its“ 2871
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR1. 136( a).
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1 .704(b).
`
`In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 10/05/2017.
`El A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2b)|:l This action is non-final.
`2a)|Z| This action is FINAL.
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)IZI Claim(s) 1-3 and 5-17is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 8-17is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`is/are allowed.
`6)I:I Claim(s)
`7)|Z| Claim(s) 1 -3 and5- 7is/are rejected.
`8)|:I Claim(s)_ is/are objected to.
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`9)I:I Claim((s)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`hit
`I/'/\WIIW.USOI.O. ovI’ atentS/init events/
`
`
`
`h/index.‘s or send an inquiry to PPI-iieedback{®usgtc.00v.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)I:l The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)I:l The drawing(s) filed on
`is/are: a)I:I accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)I:| Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)I:l All
`
`b)|:l Some” c)I:l None of the:
`
`1.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.|:l Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.|:| Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`
`3) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) E Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date.
`.
`.
`4) I:I Other'
`2) I] InformatIon DIsclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL—326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20171016
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/052,224
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions.
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`Applicant's arguments with respect to the amended claims 1 and 5 based on the
`
`Response filed on 10/05/2017 have been considered but are moot in view of the new
`
`ground(s) of rejection. Therefore, this is Final action.
`
`This instant application is continuation of 12/637856 filed on 12/15/2009 having the
`
`foreign priority in Japan filed on 12/15/2008.
`
`Claim 4 is cancelled.
`
`Claims 8-17 are withdrawn.
`
`Claims 1-3 and 5-7 elected.
`
`Claim 1
`
`is amended with the features “the organic tiirh having a first part and a sesend
`
`gert end a third part. whereiri the first part is separated item the secend part in the first
`
`
`directien and is sieser he an end at the first substrate then the seeene art. wherein the
`
`third part is between the first part and the seeend part. anti is separated trem the first
`
`gert end the sesshd gert, wherein the first gert end the third gert have a secehd width in
`
`the first direetien which is smeiier than the first width and are extentiiri
`
`sieri
`
`
`
`the seat
`
`
`
`rneteriei. wherein the seei meteriei is : revided between the first art and the third tart.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/052,224
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`egg wherein the inerganic film covers the first m the second part: and the third part”,
`
`which can be rejected by Yamazaki et at: (US 200302225?5) with the different
`
`interpretation:
`
`(&i£&'\§ marbli- ‘
`
`'5 Kinhxfing: mfiqx;
`\-.«.-:-.-.-.-.~‘~‘~‘-
`
`. _
`..
`A:
`has-m1 pets,»
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C.
`
`102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country
`or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application
`for patent in the United States.
`
`1.
`
`Claims 1 and 7 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated
`
`by Yamazaki et al. (US 20030222575).
`
`
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/052,224
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Yamazaki et al. disclose a display device comprising: a diseiay device having a disgia‘g
`
`area and a eerigherai area areund the disgiag area. comprising:
`
`88
`
`a tirst substrate
`
`an erganie 'iiirn [numeral 5 designates an inter/ayer insulating film comprising an
`
`organic insulating material [0077]] ever the first substrate,
`
`an inerganic tiirh [numeral 6 designates an inter/ayer insulating material
`
`comprising an inorganic insulating film material [0077]] en the erganie iiirn,
`
`a secend substrate i8 ebhesed te the first substrate, and
`
`a seat materiai [seal member 19a] erevided between the first substrate and the
`
`seeend substrate and surreunding the disgiag area:
`
`wherein
`
`the seat materiai is extendin aien an end at the first substrate and has a first
`
`
`
`
`width in a first direetien eressin an extendinc directien.
`
`the erganie tiirn having a first part and a seeend eart and a third part as
`
`interpretatien in Fig,
`
`1 above, wherein
`
`o
`
`the first part is; Streamed from the second
`
`
`
`eieser te an end at the first substrate than the seeend eart.
`
`o
`
`the third Qart is between the first gert and the seeehd eert, and is
`
`se areted item the first art and the seeend art the first art and the
`
`
`
`
`
`third art have a seeend width in the first direeiien which is srnaiier than
`
`the first width and are extending siting the seat materiait
`
`c-
`
`the seat rhateriai is gravided between the first gert and the third eert, and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/052,224
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`as
`
`the inorganic film covers the first part, the second part. and the third part.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis
`
`for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described
`as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented
`and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the
`time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject
`matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was
`made.
`
`1.
`
`Claims 2-3 and 5-6 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Yamazaki et al. (US 20030222575) as applied to claim 1
`
`in view of
`
`Yoshida et al. (US 20090066903).
`
`Yamazaki et al. also disclose the black matrix made of organic film [0090] and the first
`
`electrode 4 and the second electrode 7 or 10 are between the organic film and the
`
`second substrate (claim 3).
`
`However, Yamazaki et al. fail to disclose the features of claims 2 and 5-6,
`
`
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/052,224
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Yoshida et al. teach
`
`
`Claim 2:
`
`.
`
`first spacers between the first substrate 11 and the second substrate 12, wherein
`
`the first part facing the first spacers, wherein a part of the first part are
`
`overlapped with the seal material, wherein the first spacers are in contact with
`
`the seal material.
`
`
`Claim 5:
`
`.
`
`second spacers are between the first substrate and the second substrate,
`
`wherein the third part is facing the second spacers.
`
`
`Claim 6:
`
`.
`
`a part of the first part and a part of the third part are overlapped with the seal
`
`material, wherein the first spacers and the second spacers are in contact with the
`
`seal material.
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time
`
`the invention was made to further modify a liquid crystal display device as Yamazaki et
`
`al. disclosed with the features of claims 2, 5-6 for easily and accurately provided in a
`
`predetermined region of the seal member [0026] as Yoshida et al. taught.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/052,224
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to HOAN C. NGUYEN whose telephone number is
`
`(571 )272-2296. The examiner can normally be reached on MONDAY-
`
`THURSDAY:8:OOAM-4:30PM.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/052,224
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 2871
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Edward Glick can be reached on (571) 272-2490. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272-1 000.
`
`/HOAN C NGUYEN/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket