`
`Application
`No.
`15/597,745
`
`Examiner
`NGA X
`NGUYEN
`
`Yes
`
`Applicant(s)
`KAWAI et al.
`
`AIA (First Inventor
`to File) Status
`
`All participants (applicant, applicants representative, PTO personnel):
`
`1. NGA X NGUYEN (Primary Examiner); Telephonic
`
`2. Blake Kumabe (Attorney); Telephonic
`
`Date of Interview: 01 July 2019
`
`Claims Discussed: Claim 1
`
`Prior Art Discussed: Oba and Tashiro
`
`Amendment proposed: Applicant proposed to add a "data" into "determines whether or not a total data amount of
`the information
`which do not overcome the current 103 rejection.
`
`Brief Description of the main topic(s) of discussion: The Attorney clarifies the current application is directed to a
`vehicle that receives target information such as objects arround the vehicle such as distance information, relative
`speed information between the vehicle and objects. the vehicle's controller determines whether to receive a part or
`all of the target information (see Fig.3, step 8003). Then the vehicle receives traffic environment information such as
`roads information (see Fig.3 step 8007 & 8009). Examiner suggests the Applicant amend the claim to distinguish
`the target information and the traffic environment information Mr. Kumabe will check with the Applicant to amend the
`claims.
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`Proposed Amendments:
`The claims will be amended as discussed above.
`
`
`
`INGA X NGUYEN/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3662
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substance of the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview was initiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner has indicated that a written summary will be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Please further see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`
`37 CFR § 1.2 Business to be transacted in writing
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/413b (Rev. 01/01/2015)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20190701
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substance of the
`interview. (See MPEP section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is given a
`non-extendable period of the longer of one month or thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this
`interview summary form, whichever is later, to file a statement of the substance of the interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete
`and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete
`and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general
`indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or outcome of the
`interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
