`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/602,147
`
`05/23/2017
`
`KEN TAKAHASHI
`
`731156627
`
`7473
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panason1e
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`SALAZAR JR” JORGE L
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2842
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`01/25/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`US PTOeACtion @ SeedIP .Com
`
`pairlinkdktg @ seedip .eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Off/09 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/602,147
`Examiner
`JORGE L SALAZAR JR
`
`Applicant(s)
`TAKAHASHI et al.
`Art Unit
`AIA Status
`2842
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)[:] Responsive to communication(s) filed on
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)C] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4):] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)
`Claim(s)
`
`1—10 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`[:1 Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) 1 and 10 is/are rejected.
`
`Claim(s) g is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`C] Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined aflowabte. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.”smong/patents/init_event§/pph/index.'§p or send an inquiry to PPeredhagk@usptg.ggv.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)C] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 5/23/2017 is/are: a). accepted or b)E] objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)C] Some”
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2C] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3.[:] Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper N0(S)/Mai| Date 5/23/2017, 12/28/2017 and 11/14/2018_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190114
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/602,147
`Art Unit: 2842
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for
`
`the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use,
`on sale or othenNise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed
`invention.
`
`Claims 1 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by lwasaki
`
`(USPAT 5,898,405, Cited by Applicant).
`
`In regards to Claims 1 and 10, lwasaki teaches in Figure 1 an antenna device comprising the
`
`following:
`
`A patch antenna (14) which radiates a signal with a frequency of fo=1 .8975GH2 (see Column 5,
`
`Line 10 for disclosure of the frequency);
`
`A dielectric substrate (1 1) for transmitting the signal, the dielectric substrate having a dielectric
`
`(11) and a copper film forming patch antenna (14) arranged on a first surface of the dielectric (see
`
`Column 4, Lines 29-34, for disclosure of the dielectric substrate and cooper film);
`
`Wherein based on Figure 1 and Column 5, Line 8, the copper film pattern (14) has a first
`
`dimension La=47.36mm (i.e. corresponding to the claimed “L”) in a direction parallel to an inherent
`
`propagation direction of an electromagnetic wave that has the frequency f0 and that propagates on the
`
`first surface (i.e. the signal from the antenna {signal being an electromagnetic wave} which radiates at
`
`1.8975GH2 will inherently have a wave present on the first surface of the dielectric substrate which will be
`
`parallel to the first dimension La);
`
`Wherein the first dimension L is given by:
`
`L = La = 47.36mm
`
`
`
`*k*/10
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 15/602,147
`Art Unit: 2842
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Er: 2.6 (relative permittivity of the dielectric,5ee Column 5,Line 5)
`
`1
`47.36mm =— * k * A
`«2.6 — 1
`
`0
`
`
`=
`1
`47 36
`' mm .61245
`
`*
`
`*
`k A
`
`0
`
`47.36mm = 1.63278 * k * 20
`
`47.36mm = 1.63278 * k * 20
`
`.0290 = k * 20
`
`20 = wavelength of the signal 1.8975GHZ in free space
`
`lo
`
`_ 6 (speed of light)
`_
`f
`
`A _ 2.998 * 108m/s
`0 _
`1.8975GHz
`
`= 157.9 mm
`
`.0290 = k * .1579
`
`.0290 _ k
`.1579 _
`
`k = .18366
`
`Wherein k=.18366 equals to a constant in a range of 0.15 to 0.70.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claims 2-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be
`
`allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any
`
`intervening claims.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
`
`Lee et al. (U82007/0085626 A1) teaches in Paragraph [0032] a relationship between the width of
`
`a microstrip line and the dielectric permittivity of a substrate.
`
`