`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/063,447
`
`03/07/2016
`
`NAGANORI SHIRAKATA
`
`731156527
`
`9098
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panason1e
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`ROSE” DERRICK V
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2462
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`12/26/2018
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`US PTOeACtion @ SeedIP .Com
`
`pairlinkdktg @ seedip .eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`Off/09 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/063,447
`Examiner
`DERRICK V ROSE
`
`Applicant(s)
`SHIRAKATA et al.
`Art Unit
`AIA Status
`2462
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 11—15—2018.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`5)
`Claim(s)
`
`1—11 is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are rejected.
`
`[:1 Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[j Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined aflowabte. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10)[:] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11)[:] The drawing(s) filed on
`
`is/are: a)D accepted or b)l:] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12):] Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)D All
`
`b)I:I Some”
`
`c)C] None of the:
`
`1.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3.[:] Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) E] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20181124
`
`
`
`Application/ Control Number: 15/063,447
`Art Unit: 2462
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice ofPre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
`
`A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37
`
`CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for
`
`continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely
`
`paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114.
`
`Applicant's submission filed on 11—15—2018 has been entered.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 11—15—2018, with respect to the rejection(s) of
`
`claim(s) 1—11 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nabar in view of Rensburg have
`
`been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However,
`
`upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Stager et al US
`
`20110019759.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC§ 103
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and
`
`103 (or as subject to pre—AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory
`
`basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon,
`
`and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
`
`
`
`Application/ Control Number: 15/063,447
`Art Unit: 2462
`
`Page 3
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections
`
`set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not
`identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the
`prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing
`date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention
`pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claim 1 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nabar et al (US
`
`20080266176) in view of Rensburg et al (US 20100127931) and further in view of Stager et al (US
`
`20110019759)/
`
`As to claims 1 and 11 Nabar discloses a radio communication device and a communication control
`
`method thereof comprising (Nabar, 29 of Fig.1, 112 of Fif.2): first to Nth directional
`
`communicating circuitry which, in operation connect to first to Mth radio terminals through
`
`beam forming and perform radio communication, N being an integer of two or more, M being
`
`an integer of N or more (Nabar, Fig. 1-3, 70018- 1St 2“d and 3” sentences; 70034- 1St and 2“d
`
`sentence) : and space time coordinating circuitry (Nabar 70034- 3” sentence— mare-[mefllz‘mfig or
`
`mapping) which, in operation, performs controlling of the beam forming of each of the first to Nth
`
`directional communicating circuitry (Nabar 70018- 3” sentence) in accordance with (i) connection
`
`information on first beam patterns used by the first radio terminal connected to the first directional
`
`communicating circuitry and second beam patterns used by the second radio terminal connected to
`
`the second directional communicating circuitry (Nabar, 0042- 3” and 4th sentences; 70043-1St and
`
`2“d sentence- dwelopmem‘ oft/ye beampm‘z‘em).
`
`Nabar however is silent with regard to controlling (ii) interference information on interference
`
`among the first beam patterns and the second beam patterns. However in an analogous art
`
`Rensburg remedies this deficiency (Rensburg 70043- 4th sentence— NB pmwfl’zflgpredz'a‘alale [7mm and
`
`z'm‘eyfereme [0 temz'mly; 70077- 6th sentence): Therefore it would have been obvious to one of
`
`
`
`Application/ Control Number: 15 / 063,447
`Art Unit: 2462
`
`Page 4
`
`ordinary skills in the art at the time the invention was filed to combine the teachings of Nabar with
`
`that of Rensburg for the purpose of beam adjustments when subjected to interference as desired
`
`which is known in the art (Rensburg fij0013- 1St sentence).
`
`Neither Nabar or Rensburg explicitly recite a plurality of direction communication circuitries
`
`including a first directional communication circuitry to an Nth, which in operations connects to one
`
`or more of a plurality of radio terminal
`
`to an Mth terminal; space time coordinating circuitry which
`
`in operation performs controlling of the beamforming to the firs radio terminal connected to the
`
`first directional communicating circuitry and the second radio terminal connected to the second
`
`directional communicating circuitry by using one of space division multiplexing or time division
`
`multiplexing. However in an analogous art Stager remedies this deficiency: (Stager Fig.2, fij0022-0024
`
`mrz'om l‘mmmz'lz‘m and 765620673" mm‘mlled [7} a beamforming rom‘mller (pare 4992370wa romertz'fig to multiple
`
`UB3"; fij00025— rom‘mllerfi’O z'mo/éz'fig t/ye beamfimifigproreys)
`
`Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time the invention
`
`was filed to combine the teachings of Stager with the already combined teachings of Nabar and
`
`Rensburg for the purpose of generating downlink beamforming weights as desired which is known
`
`in the art (Stager fij0025- 8th sentence).
`
`Claim 2—10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nabar in view of Rensburg
`
`in view of Stager and further in view of Lim et al (US 20050195822).
`
`As to claim 2 the combined teachings of Nabar, Rensburg and Stager disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 1 however silent wherein in accordance with the
`
`connection information, the space time coordinating circuitry further causes data transfer between
`
`each of another communication layer to which the radio communication device is connected and the
`
`
`
`Application/ Control Number: 15/063,447
`Art Unit: 2462
`
`Page 5
`
`first to the Nth directional communicating circuitry. However in an analogues art Lime remedies this
`
`deficiency: (Lim $10016, fl0017- last sentences— dam tram/722mm between [VIAC- bzg/a and [022/ [@Jem).
`
`Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time the invention
`
`was filed to combine the teachings of Lim with the already combined teachings of Nabar and
`
`Rensburg for the purpose of providing a MAC protocol structure for packet communication in a
`
`wireless communication system as desired which is known in the art (Lim fl0017- 1St sentence).
`
`As to claim 3 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 2, wherein the first and second beam patterns include
`
`beam patterns different in beam direction (Nabar 119b, c, d of Fig.2).
`
`As to claim 4 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 3, wherein in a case that a combination of desired beam
`
`patterns that causes no communication interference is present among combinations of the first and
`
`second beam patterns, the first and second space time coordinating circuitry select the combination
`
`of the desired beam patterns, and in a case that a combination of undesired beam patterns that
`
`causes communication interference is present among the combinations of the first and second beam
`
`patterns, the first and second space time coordinating circuitry select a combination of beam
`
`patterns other than the combination of the undesired beam patterns (Rensburg $10013).
`
`As to claims 5 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 3, wherein adjacent communication areas of the first and
`
`second directional communicating circuitry overlap each other at least partially (Rensburg Fig.1)
`
`
`
`Application/ Control Number: 15 / 063,447
`Art Unit: 2462
`
`Page 6
`
`As to claim 6 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 3, wherein the space time coordinating circuitry further
`
`acquires quality information that indicates one or more of reception quality of a radio signal
`
`transmitted from each of the first and second directional communicating circuitry at each of the first
`
`and second radio terminals in each of the first and second beam patterns (Rensburg Fig.3, $10058—
`
`2nd and 3rd sentences— CQ1), and reception quality of a radio signal transmitted from each of the first
`
`and second radio terminals at each of the first and second directional communicating circuitry in
`
`each of the first and second beam patterns, and the space time coordinating circuitry detects the
`
`interference information from the acquired quality information (Rensburg fl0009- last sentence).
`
`As to claim 7 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 6, wherein each of the first and second directional
`
`communicating circuitry acquires the quality information in beam forming training for the first and
`
`second radio terminals (Rensburg Fig.3, fl0058— 2nd and 3rd sentences— CQ1) , and
`
`the space time coordinating circuitry performs the scheduling of the beam forming or the data
`
`transfer using the information on each of the first and second directional communicating circuitry,
`
`the information on the beam pattern used for communication with the first and second radio
`
`terminals, identification information on each of the one or more radio terminals, and information on
`
`the reception quality regarding the beam pattern not used for communication with the first and
`
`second radio terminals (Rensburg fl0083- 1St and 2“d sentence).
`
`As to claim 8 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 6, wherein the space time coordinating circuitry switches
`
`the beam pattern of each of the first and second directional communicating circuitry in accordance
`
`
`
`Application/ Control Number: 15 / 063,447
`Art Unit: 2462
`
`Page 7
`
`with the quality information and changes a connection destination of the first radio terminal
`
`connected to first directional communicating circuitry to a third directional communicating circuitry
`
`(Nabar, Fig. 1-2, Rensburg $10091, $10097).
`
`As to claim 9 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 6, wherein the space time coordinating circuitry switches
`
`the beam pattern of each of the first and second directional communicating circuitry in accordance
`
`with the interference information and changes a connection destination of the first radio terminals
`
`connected to the first directional communicating circuitry to s third directional communicating
`
`circuitry (Nabar, Fig. 1-2, Rensburg $10101, $10107).
`
`As to claim 10 the combined teachings of Nabar Rensburg, Stager and Lim disclose the radio
`
`communication device according to claim 2, wherein each of the first to Nth directional
`
`communicating circuitry includes: physical layer processing circuitry which, in operation, performs
`
`the beam forming (Lim $10068- addinga MAC headed; and low—level medium access control
`
`(MAC) layer processing circuitry which, in operation, performs transmission and reception of data
`
`with the first to the Mth radio terminals using the physical layer processing circuitry, the other
`
`communication layer includes controlling circuitry which, in operation, performs a process of a
`
`high—level MAC layer, and the space time coordinating circuitry performs transfer of data between
`
`the controlling circuitry and the low—level MAC layer processing circuitry, the transferred data being
`
`transmitted to or from the one or more radio terminals (Lim $10070- 1St sentence).
`
`C011 clusion
`
`
`
`Application/ Control Number: 15 / 063,447
`Art Unit: 2462
`
`Page 8
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's
`
`disclosure.
`
`0
`
`Suh et al— Systems and Methods for Interference Alignments in Wi—Fi— US
`
`20140056204— Fig.2; 110033.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to DERRICK V ROSE whose telephone number is (571)270—7460. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on 8:30am— 6pm.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in—person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web—based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to
`
`use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`YEMANE MESFIN can be reached on 571—272—3927. The fax phone number for the organization
`
`where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571—273—8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system,
`
`see http://pair—direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system,
`
`contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866—217—9197 (toll—free). If you would like
`
`assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800—786—9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571—272—1000.
`
`