throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`15/765,515
`
`04/03/2018
`
`Philip E. Brandish
`
`23597-US-PCT
`
`3652
`
`MERCK
`P Oo BOX 2000
`RAHWAY,NJ 07065-0907
`
`DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN
`
`ART UNIT
`
`1645
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`07/29/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`US-DOCKET-PATENT @ merck.com
`
`lori_schepisi@ merck.com
`merck_pair@firsttofile.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-4,17-21,51 and 66-75 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 17-21 and 67 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Claim(s) 51 and 68-75 is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-4 and 66 is/are rejected.
`[J Claim(s)__ is/are objectedto.
`O) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`S)
`“ If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)CL) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)C] accepted or b)C) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)C) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)LJ None of the:
`b)L) Some**
`a)LJ} All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No.
`3.0.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20210726
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`15/765,515
`Brandish etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`Patricia Duffy
`1645
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 4-8-2021.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/765,515
`Art Unit: 1645
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined underthe
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`RESPONSE TO AMENDMENT
`
`The amendmentfiled 4-8-2021 has been entered into the record. Claims 5-16, 22-50
`
`and 52-65 have been cancelled. Claims 1-4, 17-21, 51 and 66-75 are pending. Claims 1-4, 51,
`
`66 and 68-75 are under examination.
`
`The text of Title 35 of the U.S. Code not reiterated herein can be foundin the previous
`
`office action.
`
`This application contains claims 17-21 and 67 drawn to an invention nonelected without
`
`traverse. These claims remain withdrawn from consideration.
`
`Election/Restrictions
`
`Any objection/rejection not maintained herein is withdrawn based upon the amendment
`
`Rejections Withdrawn
`
`to the claims.
`
`New Rejections Based on Amendment
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a):
`
`(a) INGENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the
`
`invention, and of the manner and process of making and usingit, in suchfull, clear, concise,
`
`and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with whichit
`
`is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode
`
`contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112:
`
`The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the
`
`manner and process of making and usingit, in suchfull, clear, concise, and exact terms as to
`
`enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with whichit is most nearly
`
`connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the
`
`inventor of carrying out his invention.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/765,515
`Art Unit: 1645
`
`Page 3
`
`Claims 1-4 and 66 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA), first
`
`paragraph, asfailing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject
`
`matter which wasnot described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the
`
`art to whichit pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the
`
`invention.
`
`The independent claim has been amended to removethe functional property that the
`
`conjugate binds CD74. The anti-inflammatory agent is disclosed as specifically delivering the
`
`drug to cells expressing CD74 and upregulating genes corresponding to the effects of
`
`glucocorticoid agonists.
`
`In the absence of binding CD74, the conjugated anti-inflammatory
`
`agent has no demonstrated pharmaceuticalactivity.
`
`The art teaches that anti-inflammatory agents and glucocorticoid receptor agonists in
`
`particular bind to the glucocorticoid receptor which is a family of intracellular receptors
`
`(Timmermans et al, Frontiers in Immunology, 10:1545, pages 1-17, 2019; page 1 secondfull
`
`paragraph). Due to their lipophilic nature, free glucocorticoids diffuse through the cell
`
`membrane to exert their function (page 2, column 2, third paragraph and paragraph bridging
`
`pages 2-3). Other anti-inflammatory agents such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents
`
`(NSAIDS) also actin the intracellular environment as the cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibitors.
`
`The claimed conjugates would not be expectedto diffuse through a cell membrane in orderfor
`
`the agonist to bind the receptor or enzyme to exert the knownbiological effects of these anti-
`
`inflammatory agents. The specification does not demonstrate that the conjugate freely diffused
`
`through the plasma membrane of cells and as such, in the absenceof further guidance from
`
`Applicants, the skilled artisan would not know howto use a conjugate that does not bind CD74.
`
`The art fails to teach diffusion across the plasma membrane for these large conjugates and rely
`
`upon mechanisms such as endocytosis, pinocytosis and receptor/protein
`
`internalization/recycling to deliver the drug intracellularly.
`
`In the absence of a specific delivery
`
`the specification disclose no mechanism to deliver the anti-inflammatory agent to acell and the
`
`art suggests none.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the claims are not enabled for a use.
`
`Claims 1-4 and 66 stand rejected. Claims 51 and 68-75are allowable. Claims 17-21
`
`and 67 remain withdrawn from consideration.
`
`Status of Claims
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/765,515
`Art Unit: 1645
`
`Page 4
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presentedin this
`
`Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant
`
`is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the eventafirst reply is filed within TWO
`
`MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after
`
`the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the shortened statutory period
`
`will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event,
`
`however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this
`
`final action.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR
`
`system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on accessto the Private
`
`PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to Patricia Duffy whose telephone numberis 571-272-0855. The examiner
`
`can generally be reached on 7:30 am - 4:00 pm.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone
`
`are unsuccessful, the examiner’s Supervisor Gary Nickol can be reached at 571-272-0835.
`
`The fax phone numberfor the organization wherethis application or proceeding is
`
`assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`/Patricia Duffy/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1645
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket