throbber

`
`V i$ T
`{5%
`
`A
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`15/779,575
`
`07/16/2018
`
`Junichi MUTOH
`
`PIPMM-59207
`
`5183
`
`759°
`52°“
`PEARNE & GORDON LLP
`
`06%”
`
`1801 EAST 9TH STREET
`SUITE 1200
`
`CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108
`
`COX JUSTIA Q
`
`3736
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`06/21/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`patdoeket@pearne.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`0,7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`15/779,575
`Examiner
`TIA cox
`
`Applicant(s)
`MUTOH et al.
`Art Unit
`3736
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 07/16/2018.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) 1—4,16 and 19 is/are rejected.
`
`Claim(s) 5—15 and 17—18 is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[:1 Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.'sp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10):] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11):] The drawing(s) filed on
`
`is/are: a)C] accepted or b)Ej objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)C] Some**
`
`c)CI None of the:
`
`1C] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2C] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3.. Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20190611
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`2.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use,
`on sale or othenNise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed
`invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claim 1
`
`is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Toshiharu
`
`(JP 2009181298 A).
`
`Regarding claim 1: Toshiharu discloses a shopping basket (20) comprising: a
`
`main basket body (21) having an upper opening and a lower opening which are
`
`opposite to each other in an up-down direction, the main basket body (21)
`
`configured to store a product therein; and a bottom part (22) attached to the main
`
`basket body (21) to open and close the lower opening ([0007]), wherein, when
`
`the bottom part (22) closes the lower opening, the main basket body (21) and the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 3
`
`bottom part (22) constitute an internal space which is surrounded by the main
`
`basket body (21) and the bottom part (22) and which communicates with the
`
`upper opening and the lower opening, and allow the internal space to store the
`
`product therein, and wherein, when the bottom part (22) opens the lower
`
`opening, the lower opening allows the product to be taken out of the internal
`
`space through the lower opening ([0008]).
`
`
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`5.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 4
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`6.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`7.
`
`Claims 2—4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Toshiharu (JP 2009181298 A) and further in view of Kuratomi (JPS49—123274U).
`
`Regarding claim 2: Toshiharu discloses the shopping basket as appiied to otairn
`
`t above, except wherein the hottont part is rnevehie with respect to the main
`
`basket body in a taterat direction dittetent item the up~down direction. Kuratomi
`
`teaches a basket wherein the bottom part is movaeie with respect to the main
`
`haeket body in a iateret direction (Figure 3) ditterent front the tie—down direction.
`
`it wonid have been obvious to one of ordinary skiit in the art before the ettective
`
`tiiing date 03‘ the ciaimed invention to modify the shopping cart oi Toshiharu with
`
`the bottom part movahie in a iaterai direction. The motivation tor doing so wettid
`
`he so that it isn’t neceeeaty to oarry/iiit the basket to rernove the contained items
`
`(Kuratomi, Detaiied Description, Page 2: Paragraph 4-},
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`Regarding claim 3: Teehiham dieeieeee the eheppihg basket as; eppiied te eiairn
`
`1 aheve, except wherein the hettem part Ehciudee a pEate body eiieahie en the
`
`maih basket hedy. Karatemi teaches a basket wherein the bettem part iheiudee a
`
`eiate body eiidahie en the main basket heey. it weuie have been ehvieue te ene
`
`of ordinary ekiii in the art hetere the effective tiiing date of the eieéined invention
`
`te medity the ehepeing cart at Teshiharu with the bottom part ineiuding e eiidahie
`
`piete hedy as; taught by Ktiratemi. The metévatien fer doing 30 wenid he so that it
`
`is; the heueed items; can he eenvenientiy removed (Kurami, Deteiied DEESCi‘iptiQt‘t;
`
`Paragraph 4, Page 2}.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`Regarding claim 4: Teehiheruhuretemi dieeioeee the shopping basket shopping
`
`basket as aeoiieo te eiaim 3 eoeve, and wherein the main basket body ineiuciee a
`
`guide raii {heretornt 7} that guidee the piete may to eiiew the piete may to metre
`
`(Ktiretonti, Deteiierj Description, Paragraph 2).
`
`it wetiitt have been obvious to one
`
`et erciinery eitiii in the art ioetere the effective iiiing date ei the eieimed invention
`
`te modify the shopping basket oi Teehihero with the guide reii thet guides the
`
`eiete bedy, eiiowing it to move, as taught by Ktiratemi, The motivation tea“ doing
`
`so wouid be ee that it is; the houeed items; can he convenientiy removed (hurami,
`
`Deteiied Deeerietien, Paragraph 43 Page 2).
`
`8.
`
`Claims 16 & 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Toshiharu-Kuratomi (JP 2009181298 A- S49-123274U) and further in view of Nakajima
`
`(854-176538).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`as Teehiherwhureterni dieeieeee the eheeping beeket
`
`aeeerding te eieim 1, however teite te expiieitiy dieeieee whereih the bottom pert
`
`has 21 first tetatabie body and at eeeehd tetetabte body that eteee the iewet
`
`eeehihg and eiiew the precinct te be pieced eat the first retetebie body end the
`
`eeeend tetetebie bedy; and wherein the tiret r’etetebie bedy end the eeeend
`
`retetebie body retete with respect to the main heehet bedy in dittetent directiehe
`
`about an axis part. Teehiharu indicates thet ee tong 5-13 the geede hetd within the
`
`eheebing basket can be discharged from the bettem btete, the epeeitie
`
`eernpeeitieh (it hew thie happens ie net iihtited. Neheiirne teaches; e basket
`
`whereih the bettern part has; 3 first end Seeend tetatehie that eieees the matter
`
`opening in different diteetiene ehedt eh exist Thetetete, it wetitd have been
`
`ebvieue te ene et Ordinary ehiit in the art betere the effective tiiing date at the
`
`eteimed inventieh to inedity the bettern et‘ the ehepping heeket et Teehiherd with
`
`the first ahd eeeend retetebte bedies 8S euggeeted by Nahetirne tee eeen heiew).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 8
`
`
`
`
`
`ss Tushiham~§<uratomé~Nakajima dischses the shaming
`
`basket as appiied t0 ciaim "36 abcve, wherein the first retatabEe heady and the
`
`393mm rotatabie bady mime synci‘ammugiy in each other in diffemnt directians,
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 15/779,575
`Art Unit: 3736
`
`Page 9
`
`
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`9.
`
`Claims 5-15 & 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base
`
`claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the
`
`limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
`
`Conclusion
`
`10.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to TIA COX whose telephone number is (571 )272—1 173.
`
`The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Wed SAM-6PM, Thurs 6-2, Fri OFF.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket