`
`Application
`No.
`16/150,062
`Examiner
`CYNTHIA
`SEGU RA
`
`Yes
`
`Applicant(s)
`HASHIGAMI et al.
`
`AIA (First inventor
`to File) Status
`
`All participants (applicant, applicants representative, PTO personnel):
`
`1. CYNTHIA SEGURA (Primary Examiner);
`Telephonic
`
`2. GRANT STEYER(Attomey: REG. NO. 71,209);
`Telephonic
`
`Date of Interview: 18 March 2020
`
`Claims Discussed: Claim 1
`
`Prior Art Discussed: Nashizawa (US—PGPUB 20170171446); figs. 4, 10
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`|tem(s) under 35 U.S.C. 102:
`Discussed the rejection of claim 1 and how Applicant's Representative believes Nashizawa does not teach the
`claim limitations.
`
`Discussed claim language of claim 1 and how the examiner believes it is not distinguishable over the
`Nashizawa reference.
`
`Discussed paragraphs 0028—0029 and figures 2A—ZB of the Specification of the Instant Application to further
`explained the limitations of claim 1.
`
`Discussed possible amendments for claim 1, including further defining the exposure value (i.e. related to a
`brightness value) and further defining the auto exposure function (i.e. related to interactive user input which
`enables the user to adjust the exposure determined by the camera).
`
`The discussed possible amendments appear to overcome the Nashizawa reference.
`
`Further search and consideration shall be provided pending an official response.
`
`Attachment(s): Agenda,
`
`
`
`ICYNTHIA SEGURA/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2698
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substance of the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview was initiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner has indicated that a written summary will be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Please further see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`
`37 CFR § 1.2 Business to be transacted in writing
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/413b (Rev. 01/01/2015)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20200318
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substance
`of the interview. (See MPEP section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is
`given a non-extendable period of the longer of one month or thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing
`date of this interview summary form, whichever is later, to file a statement of the substance of the interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A
`complete and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04
`for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argument or issue
`discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general
`results or outcome of the interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the
`issues raised.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
