UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`16/210,483
`
`12/05/2018
`
`TETSUYA YAMAMOTO
`
`731456.422C2
`
`665 8
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panason1e (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`MOORE JR” MICHAEL J
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2467
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`10/21/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`US PTOeACtion @ SeedIP .Com
`
`pairlinkdktg @ seedip .eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`0/7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/210,483
`Examiner
`MICHAEL J MOORE JR
`
`Applicant(s)
`YAMAMOTO et al.
`Art Unit
`AIA (FITF) Status
`2467
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 12/5/2018.
`[:1 A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a)D This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)
`
`This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4)[:] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expat/7e Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`E] Claim(s)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are rejected.
`
`[:1 Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`
`
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[j Claim(s)
`9
`* If any claims have been determined aflowabie. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`10)[:] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11). The drawing(s) filed on 12/5/2018 is/are: a). accepted or b)E] objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12). Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a). All
`
`b)D Some**
`
`C)D None of the:
`
`1.. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.[:] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3:] Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) C] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20191015
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/210,483
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`2.
`
`The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/5/18 is in
`
`compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure
`
`statement is being considered by the examiner.
`
`Claim Objections
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1-6 are objected to because of the following informalities:
`
`Regarding claim 1, on line 8,
`
`it appears that the word “is” before the word
`
`“associated” should instead be “are”.
`
`Claims 2 and 3 are also objected to as being dependent on claim 1 and
`
`containing the same deficiency.
`
`Regarding claim 4, on line 7, it appears that the word “is” before the word
`
`“associated” should instead be “are”.
`
`Regarding claim 5, on line 6,
`
`it appears that the word “is” before the word
`
`“associated” should instead be “are”.
`
`Regarding claim 6, on line 6,
`
`it appears that the word “is” before the word
`
`“associated” should instead be “are”.
`
`Appropriate correction is required.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/210,483
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 3
`
`Double Parenting
`
`4.
`
`The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created
`
`doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the
`
`unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent
`
`and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double
`
`patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at
`
`least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference
`
`claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have
`
`been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46
`
`USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum,
`
`686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619
`
`(CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
`
`A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321 (c) or 1.321 (d)
`
`may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory
`
`double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be
`
`commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a
`
`result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See
`
`MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file
`
`provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) -
`
`706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file
`
`provisions of the AIA. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR
`
`1.321 (b).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/210,483
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 4
`
`The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be
`
`used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application
`
`in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26,
`
`PTO/AlA/25, or PTO/AlA/26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may
`
`be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets
`
`all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For
`
`more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Claims 1-6 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being
`
`unpatentable over claims 1 and 3-7 of U.S. Patent No. 10,194,428. Although the claims
`
`at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because of
`
`the following correspondences.
`
`Regarding claim 1, “a terminal, comprising: a receiver, which, in operation,
`
`receives repetitions of a control signal across a plurality of first subframes and a data
`
`signal allocated to a resource indicated by the control signal” corresponds to the same
`
`in claim 1 of the above U.S. Patent.
`
`“A generator, which, in operation, performs repetition of a response signal for the
`
`data signal across a plurality of second subframes and generates a transmission signal
`
`by multiplying the response signals in the plurality of second subframes
`
`which is
`
`associated with one of the plurality of first subframes” corresponds to “a generator,
`
`which, in operation, performs repetition of a response signal for the data signal across a
`
`plurality of second subframes and generates a transmission signal by multiplying the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/210,483
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 5
`
`response signals in the plurality of second subframes
`
`which is associated with one of
`
`the plurality of first subframes” in claim 1 of the above U.S. Patent.
`
`Lastly, “a transmitter, which, in operation, transmits the transmission signal”
`
`corresponds to the same in claim 1 of the above U.S. Patent.
`
`Claim 1 of the instant application further claims “multiplying the response signals
`
`in the plurality of second subframes by respective resource blocks, which is associated
`
`with one of the plurality of first subframes” rather than “multiplying the response signals
`
`in the plurality of second subframes by respective components of an inter-subframe
`
`orthogonal code seguence which is associated with one of the plurality of first
`
`subframes” as claimed in claim 1 of the above U.S. Patent. However, the above
`
`difference is merely using an alternative parameter in the multiplication step to perform
`
`the same method and, as a result, is considered an obvious variation which is not
`
`patentably distinct.
`
`Regarding claim 2, this claim similarly corresponds to claim 3 of the above U.S.
`
`Patent.
`
`Patent.
`
`Patent.
`
`Patent.
`
`Patent.
`
`Regarding claim 3, this claim similarly corresponds to claim 4 of the above U.S.
`
`Regarding claim 4, this claim similarly corresponds to claim 5 of the above U.S.
`
`Regarding claim 5, this claim similarly corresponds to claim 6 of the above U.S.
`
`Regarding claim 6, this claim similarly corresponds to claim 7 of the above U.S.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/210,483
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 6
`
`Conclusion
`
`6.
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure. References considered relevant to this application are listed in
`
`the attached “Notice of References Cited” (PTO-892).
`
`7.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J. MOORE, JR., whose telephone number is
`
`(571)272-3168. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (9am-4pm).
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Hassan A. Phillips can be reached at (571 )272—3940. The fax phone
`
`number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -
`
`273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/210,483
`Art Unit: 2467
`
`Page 7
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272-1 000.
`
`/MICHAEL J MOORE JR/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
`
`