Applicant(s)
`Application No.
`LIM et al.
`16/417,514
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Art Unit]
`Examiner
`Applicant-InitiatedInterview Summary
`
`DAKSHESHD PARIKH|2488 Yes
`
`All participants (applicant, applicants representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) DAKSHESH D. PARIKH.
`
`(2) Timothy L. Boller (Reg. No. 47,435).
`
`Date of Interview: 14 January 2021.
`
`Type:
`
`() Video Conference
`Telephonic
`C) Personal [copy given to: Capplicant © applicant's representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`I Yes
`
`No.
`
`OMothers
`(112 O102 M103
`(101
`Issues Discussed
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 1.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: Cited Prior art of reference.
`
`Substanceof Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics may include: identification or clarification of a
`reference or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied referencesetc...)
`
`Applicant requested an interview with the Examiner in order to discuss the proposed claim amendments (see attached
`. Examiner thanks applicant for their cooperation in discussing the allowable subject matters. Applicant explained the
`claim amendmentsin brief. Examiner explained that the claim amendment does not overcomethecited prior art of
`reference. Examinerindicated that if they can amendthe claims with specific details of their invention, then they may
`overcomethe cited prior art of reference. However, examiner would require to perform further search to determine
`allowability. Examiner further emphasized to the applicant to make sure that the amended claim language must have
`support in the specification. Finally, Examinerindicated that he is always willing to work with the applicant in order to
`define the allowable subject matter based on his search..
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2488 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substanceof the interview. (Gee MPEP
`section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already beenfiled, applicant is given a non-extendable period of the longer of one month or
`thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this interview summary form, whichever islater, to file a statement of the substanceof the
`interview.
`
`Examinerrecordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substanceof any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of
`the substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the
`general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the
`general results or outcome ofthe interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issuesraised.
`
`C) Attachment
`
`/DAKSHESH D PARIKH/
`
`PTOL-413 (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20210114
`
`

`

`Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), Section 713.04, Substanceof Interview Must be Made of Record
`A complete written statement as to the substance of any face-to-face, video conference, or telephoneinterview with regard to an application must be madeof record in the
`application whether or not an agreement with the examiner was reachedat the interview.
`
`Summary of Record of Interview Requirements
`
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1.133 Interviews
`Paragraph (b}
`
`In every instance where reconsideration is requested in view of an interview with an examiner, a complete written statement of the reasons presented at the interview as
`warranting favorable action must be filed by the applicant. An interview does not remove the necessity for reply to Office action as specified in §§ 1.111, 1.135. (85 U.S.C.
`132)
`
`37 CFR §1.2 Businessto be transacted in writing.
`All business with the Patent or Trademark Office should be transacted in writing. The personal attendance of applicants or their attorneys or agents at the Patent and
`Trademark Office is unnecessary. The action of the Patent and Trademark Office will be based exclusively on the written record in the Office. No attention will be paid to any
`alleged oral promise, stipulation, or understanding in relation to which there is disagreement or doubt.
`
`The action of the Patent and Trademark Office cannot be based exclusively on the written record in the Office if that record isitself
`incomplete through the failure to record the substanceofinterviews.
`It is the responsibility of the applicant or the attorney or agent to make the substanceof an interview of record in the application file, unless
`the examinerindicates he or she will do so. It is the examiners responsibility to see that such a record is made and to correct material inaccuracies
`whichbeardirectly on the question of patentability.
`
`Examiners must complete an Interview Summary Form for each interview held where a matter of substance has been discussed during the
`interview by checking the appropriate boxesand filling in the blanks. Discussions regarding only procedural matters, directed solely to restriction
`requirements for which interview recordation is otherwise provided for in Section 812.01 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, or pointing out
`typographical errors or unreadable script in Office actions or the like, are excluded from the interview recordation procedures below. Where the
`substanceof an interview is completely recorded in an Examiners Amendment, no separate Interview Summary Recordis required.
`
`The Interview Summary Form shall be given an appropriate Paper No., placed in the right hand portion ofthefile, and listed on the
`"Contents" section of the file wrapper. In a personal interview, a duplicate of the Form is given to the applicant (or attorney or agent) at the conclusion of
`the interview. In the case of a telephone or video-conferenceinterview, the copy is mailed to the applicants correspondence addresseither with or prior
`to the next official communication. If additional correspondence from the examineris not likely before an allowanceorif other circumstancesdictate, the
`Form should be mailed promptly after the interview rather than with the next official communication.
`
`The Form provides for recordation of the following information:
`- Application Number (Series Code and Serial Number)
`- Name ofapplicant
`- Name of examiner
`- Date of interview
`- Type of interview (telephonic, video-conference, or personal)
`- Name ofparticipant(s) (applicant, attorney or agent, examiner, other PTO personnel, etc.)
`- An indication whether or not an exhibit was shown or a demonstration conducted
`- An identification of the specific prior art discussed
`-
`An indication whether an agreement was reached andif so, a description of the general nature of the agreement (may be by
`attachmentof a copy of amendments or claims agreed as being allowable). Note: Agreementas to allowability is tentative and does
`notrestrict further action by the examiner to the contrary.
`- The signature of the examiner who conducted the interview (if Form is not an attachment to a signed Office action)
`
`Itis desirable that the examiner orally remind the applicant of his or her obligation to record the substanceof the interview of each case. It
`should be noted, however, that the Interview Summary Form will not normally be considered a complete and proper recordation of the interview unless
`it includes, or is supplemented by the applicant or the examiner to include, all of the applicable items required below concerning the substance of the
`interview.
`
`A complete and proper recordation of the substance of any interview should include at least the following applicable items:
`1) A brief description of the nature of any exhibit shown or any demonstration conducted,-
`) an identification of the claims discussed,
`) an identification of the specific prior art discussed,
`)
`an identification of the principal proposed amendmentsof a substantive nature discussed, unless these are already described on
`the Interview Summary Form completed by the Examiner,
`5) a brief identification of the general thrust of the principal arguments presented to the examiner,
`(The identification of arguments need not be lengthy or elaborate. A verbatim or highly detailed description of the arguments is not
`required. The identification of the argumentsis sufficient if the general nature or thrust of the principal arguments made to the
`examiner can be understoodin the context of the application file. Of course, the applicant may desire to emphasize and fully
`describe those arguments which he or she feels were or might be persuasive to the examiner.)
`6) a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed, and
`7)
`if appropriate, the general results or outcome ofthe interview unless already described in the Interview Summary Form completed
`by the examiner.
`Examiners are expected to carefully review the applicants record of the substance of an interview. If the record is not complete and accurate,
`the examinerwill give the applicant an extendable one month time period to correct the record.
`
`2 34
`
`Examiner to Check for Accuracy
`
`If the claims are allowable for other reasons of record, the examiner should send a letter setting forth the examiners version of the statement
`attributed to him or her. If the record is complete and accurate, the examiner should place the indication, Interview Record OK on the paperrecording
`the substanceofthe interview along with the date and the examinersinitials.
`
`