Applicant(s)
`Application No.
`LIM etal.
`16/417,514
`AIA (First Inventor
`Art
`Examiner
`to File) Status
`Unit
`DAKSHESH D
`
`PARIKH 2488+|Yes
`
`Examiner-InitiatedInterview Summary DAKSHESH D PARIKH
`
`TimothyL. Boller (Reg. No. 47,435)
`
`Telephonic
`Attorney of Record Po
`
`Date of Interview: 19 May 2021
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`35 U.S.C. 103
`
`Examinercalled the applicant on 03/11/2021 to provided compact prosecution via examinerinitiated
`interview. Applicant was very cooperative in discussing the allowable matter. Examiner, also shared his
`finding, a new priorart of references US20190281285A1, US20120288007A1, US20130136175A1,
`US20130163664A1 and US20170353721A1, with the applicant in the process of discussing the
`allowable subject matter. However,after discussing this case in a number of telephone conferencesto
`expedite prosecution, no agreement was reached between examiner and applicant for an allowable
`subject matter. Finally on 5/19/2021, applicant agreed to issue the office action as more time is needed.
`
`/DAKSHESH D PARIKH/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2488
`
`37 CFR§ 1.2 Businessto be transacted in writing
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substance of the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview wasinitiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner hasindicated that a written summarywill be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Pleasefurther see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: lt is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substanceof interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substanceof any interview of record. A complete
`and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the itemslisted in MPEP 713.04 for complete
`and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argumentor issue discussed, a general
`indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or outcome of the
`interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issuesraised.
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/41 3b (Rev. Oct. 2019)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20210521
`
`