www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/423,756
`
`05/28/2019
`
`Noritaka IGUCHI
`
`2019-0909
`
`1072
`
`UP
`Lind&
`Wenderoth,
`Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.
`1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Suite 500
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`EKPO, NNENNA NGOZI
`
`2425
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`01/29/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`eoa@ wenderoth.com
`kmiller@wenderoth.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-4 and 6-8 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 11-12 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Claim(s) 5 is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-4 and 6-8 is/are rejected.
`[J Claim(s)__is/are objectedto.
`OO Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`S)
`“ If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)L) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a) accepted or b){ objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)CZ) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)LJ None of the:
`b)L) Some**
`a)LJ All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No.
`3.0.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 91/21/2021,
`4) ( Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20210121
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/423,756
`IGUCHI et al.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`NNENNA N EKPO
`2425
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 11/18/2020.
`LC} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)l¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\(Z Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Abstract
`
`2.
`
`Previous objection to the abstract is withdrawnin view of Applicant filing of the
`
`substitute abstract.
`
`Double Patenting
`
`3.
`
`The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created
`
`doctrine groundedin public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the
`
`unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent
`
`and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double
`
`patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are notidentical, but at least
`
`one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s)
`
`because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been
`
`obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d
`
`1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir.
`
`1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum,
`
`686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619
`
`(CCPA 1970); and /n re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 3
`
`A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d)
`
`may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory
`
`double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to
`
`be commonly ownedwith this application, or claims an invention made as a result of
`
`activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP §
`
`717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions
`
`of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(I)(1) - 706.02(I)(3) for
`
`applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the
`
`AIA. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321 (b).
`
`The USPTOInternet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be
`
`used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application in which the
`
`form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA/25, or
`
`PTO/AIA/26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer maybefilled out
`
`completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meetsall
`
`requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more
`
`information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to
`
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-l.jsp.
`
`Claims 1-8 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being
`
`unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 10,349,091. Although the claims at
`
`issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims
`
`1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 10,349,091 claims all the features of claims 1-8 of the instant
`
`application in an explicit or inherent manner.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 4
`
`Election by original presentation
`
`4.
`
`Newly submitted claims 11 and 12 directed to an invention that is independent or
`
`distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons:
`
`With respect to the independent amendedclaims (11 and 12), the applicants add
`
`newlimitations that change the scope of the invention, such as (generatefirst
`
`information indicating a playback timing of the content based on Coordinated Universal
`
`Time (UTC)).
`
`Note: That this becomesa burden to the examiner to search the acclaimed
`
`limitations/functionality.
`
`Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented
`
`invention, this invention has been constructively elected by original presentation for
`
`prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 11 and 12 are withdrawn from
`
`consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and
`
`MPEP § 821.03.
`
`An amendment canceling all claims drawnto the elected invention and
`
`presenting only claims drawn to the nonelected invention should not be entered. Such
`
`an amendment is nonresponsive. Applicant should be notified by using form paragraph
`
`8.26.
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`5.
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-8 have been considered but are
`
`moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 5
`
`prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challengedin the
`
`argument.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103)is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 1-4, 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Kitazato (U.S. Pub. No. 2017/0012765) in view of Urano (U.S. Pub. No. 2008/0165624).
`
`Regarding claim 1, Kitazato discloses a transmitting method of storing data
`
`making up a coded stream into a predetermined data unit and transmitting the stored
`
`data in the predetermined data unit, comprising (see fig. 2 — Broadcast Transmission
`
`System):
`
`generating presentation time information indicating a presentation time of the
`
`predetermined data unit, based on reference time information received from an external
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 6
`
`source (see paragraph 0070 and fig. 2; The packetization/time stamp addition unit 14
`
`packetizes the encoded transmission media and adds the presentation time information
`
`for every presentation unit of the transmission media based on the time information
`
`generated by the clock unit 12); and
`
`transmitting (i) the predetermined data unit (see paragraphs 0099, 0111 and fig.
`
`12; transporting an media presentation unit (MPU)), (ii) first control information which
`
`includes the generated presentation time information (see paragraphs 0108-0111 and
`
`fig. 12; MPU time stamp descriptor).
`
`However, Kitazato is silent as to (iii) second control information which includes
`
`leap second information indicating whether or not the presentation time information is a
`
`time that is before a leap second adjustment.
`
`Urano discloses (iii) second control information which includes leap second
`
`information indicating whether or not the presentation time information is a time that is
`
`before a leap second adjustment (see paragraph 0028; leap second adjustment).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the
`
`claimed invention to a person having ordinaryskill in the art to which said subject matter
`
`pertains to and to modify the method of Kitazato to include second control information
`
`whichincludes leap second information indicating whether or not the presentation time
`
`information is a time that is before a leap second adjustment as taught by Urano for the
`
`advantage of improving stability of the signal.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 7
`
`Regarding claim 8, Kitazato discloses a receiving method of receiving a
`
`predetermined data unit in which data making up a coded stream is stored, comprising
`
`(see fig. 2 - Receiver):
`
`receiving (i) the predetermined data unit (see paragraphs 0099, 0111 andfig. 12;
`
`receiving an media presentation unit (MPU)), (il) first control information which includes
`
`presentation time information indicating a presentation time of the predetermined data
`
`unit (see paragraphs 0108-0111 and fig. 12; MPU time stamp descriptor).
`
`However, Kitazato is silent as to (iii) second control information which
`
`includes leap second information indicating whether or not the presentation
`
`time information is a time that is before a leap second adjustment; and reproducing the
`
`received predetermined data unit based on the first and second control information that
`
`are received.
`
`Urano discloses (iii) second control information which includes leap second
`
`information indicating whether or not the presentation time information is a time thatis
`
`before a leap second adjustment (see paragraph 0028; leap second adjustment); and
`
`reproducing the received predetermined data unit based on the first and second
`
`control information that are received (see paragraph 0016-0020).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the
`
`claimed invention to a person having ordinaryskill in the art to which said subject matter
`
`pertains to and to modify the method of Kitazato to include second control information
`
`whichincludes leap second information indicating whether or not the presentation time
`
`information is a time that is before a leap second adjustment as taught by Urano for the
`
`advantage of improving stability of the signal..
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 8
`
`Regarding claim 2, Kitazato and Urano discloses everything claimed as applied
`
`above (see claim 1). Kitazato discloses wherein in the generating, the presentation time
`
`information corresponding to eachof a plurality of the predetermined data units is
`
`generated for the eachof the plurality of the predetermined data units, and the second
`
`control information transmitted in the transmitting includes the identification information
`
`corresponding to the eachof the plurality of the predetermined data units in each loupe
`
`of the each of the plurality of the predetermined data units (see paragraphs 0299 and
`
`fig. 12).
`
`Regarding claim 3, Kitazato and Urano discloses everything claimed as applied
`
`above (see claim 1). Kitazato discloses wherein the presentation time of the
`
`predetermined data unit is a time to present an accessunit positioned at a head in an
`
`order of presenting plural access units included in the predetermined data unit (see
`
`paragraph 0089; the MPU starts from a random access point (RAP) and includes one
`
`accesspoint (AU) or a plurality of AUs).
`
`Regarding claim 4, Kitazato and Urano discloses everything claimed as applied
`
`above (see claim 1). Kitazato discloses wherein in the generating, the presentation time
`
`of the predetermined data unit is generated by adding a predetermined period of time to
`
`the reference time information (see paragraph 0012, 0070).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 9
`
`Regarding claim 6, Kitazato and Urano discloses everything claimed as applied
`
`above (see claim 1). Kitazato discloses wherein the predetermined data unit is a media
`
`presentation unit (MPU) (see paragraphs 0099, 0111 and fig. 12; transporting an media
`
`presentation unit (MPU)), the first control information is an MPU time stamp descriptor
`
`(see paragraphs 0108-0111 and fig. 12; MPU time stamp descriptor), and the second
`
`control information is an MPU extension time stamp descriptor (see paragraph 0299).
`
`Regarding claim 7, Kitazato and Urano discloses everything claimed as applied
`
`above (see claim 1). Kitazato discloses wherein the reference time information
`
`complies with a networktime protocol (NTP) (see paragraphs 0217-0218).
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claim 5 is allowed.
`
`The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`matter: Claim 5 is allowed in view of Applicant's Amendmentfiled on 11/18/2020.
`
`Particularly, the prior art of record fails to fairly suggest a transmitting method of storing
`
`data making up a codedstream into a predetermined data unit and transmitting the
`
`stored in the predetermined data unit, comprising: wherein the identification indicates
`
`whether or not the presentation time information is generated based on the reference
`
`time information indicating a time within a time range from a time preceding, by a
`
`predetermined period of time, a time immediately before a leap second adjustment up to
`
`the time immediately before the leap second adjustment is made.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 10
`
`9.
`
`Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later
`
`than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably
`
`accompanythe issue fee. Such submission should be clearly labeled “Comments on
`
`Statement of Reasons for Allowance’.
`
`Citation of Pertinent Prior Art
`
`Shauh
`
`U.S. Pub. No. 2014/000341 7
`
`Lin
`
`U.S. Pub. No. 2014/0028498
`
`Rischar
`
`Akiyama
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,447,931
`
`U.S. Pub. No. 2012/0201101
`
`Conclusion
`
`10.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortenedstatutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the eventafirst replyis filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date ofthis final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 11
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to NNENNA NGOZI EKPO whosetelephone number is
`
`(571)270-1663. The examiner can normally be reached on M-W 10:00am - 6:30pm,
`
`TH-F 8:00am - 4:30pm.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached on 571-272-7527. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-
`
`my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on accessto the Private
`
`PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access
`
`to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-
`
`272-1000.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/423,756
`Art Unit: 2425
`
`Page 12
`
`NNENNA EKPO
`Primary Examiner
`Art Unit 2425
`
`/NNENNA N EKPO/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2425
`January 25, 2021.
`
`