throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/580,195
`
`09/24/2019
`
`Takahito Nakayama
`
`P190960US00
`
`6791
`
`WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP
`8500 LEESBURG PIKE
`SUITE 7500
`TYSONS, VA 22182
`
`RAYMOND,BRITTANY L
`
`ART UNIT
`1722
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`11/08/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`patentmail @ whda.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-2 and 4-13 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Cj] Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-13 is/are rejected.
`(1 Claim(s)__is/are objectedto.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)(] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 9/24/2019 is/are: a)(¥) accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)¥) All
`1.4) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20211103
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/580 ,195
`Nakayamaetal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`BRITTANY L RAYMOND
`1722
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 8/10/2021.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`2.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness
`
`under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized asfollows:
`
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
`
`4. Considering objective evidence presentin the application indicating
`
`obviousness or nonobviousness.
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Shiozaki (JP Publication 2016-127000) in view of Schmidt (U.S.
`
`Patent Publication 2013/0164635).
`
`Shiozaki discloses a secondary battery comprising a positive electrode, a
`
`negative electrode, and a non-aqueous electrolyte, wherein the positive electrode
`
`comprises a current collector, a protective layer comprising a conductive material and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 3
`
`inorganic compound, and an active material layer (Paragraphs 0012, 0016, 0022,
`
`0023), as recited in claim 1 of the present invention. Shiozaki also discloses that the
`
`content of the inorganic compound in the protective layer is 90-99 wt% (Paragraph
`
`0023), as recited in claim 1 of the present invention. Shiozaki teaches that the
`
`protective layer has a thickness of 1-5 microns (Paragraph 0022), as recited in claim 4
`
`of the present invention. Shiozaki also teachesthat the inorganic compound can be
`
`manganeseoxide, silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, and aluminum oxide (Paragraph
`
`0023), as recited in claim 6 of the present invention. Shiozaki states that the conductive
`
`material can be carbon black, acetylene black, ketjen black or graphite (Paragraph
`
`0019), as recited in claim 11 of the present invention.
`
`Shiozaki fails to disclose that a thermally expandable material, different from a
`
`conductive material, is present in the cathode and has larger volume expansion than the
`
`conductive material, that the expandable material is present in an amountof 0.1-5
`
`mass%, or 0.1-1 mass%, that an average particle size of the expandable materialis 1-
`
`500 microns and the expansion volume is 10-300 m/g, and that an expanded graphite is
`
`formed by treating a natural graphite with concentrated sulfuric acid and concentrated
`
`nitric acid.
`
`Schmidt discloses a lithium sulfur secondary battery comprising: a cathode, an
`
`anode and electrolyte, wherein the cathode comprises sulfur, 1-75 wt% of an expanded
`
`graphite and further conductive agents (Paragraph 0012), as recited in claims 1 and 8 of
`
`the present invention. Schmidt also discloses that the conductive agent can be carbon
`
`black, acetylene black, ketjen black, graphite, etc. (Paragraph 0057), as recited in claim
`
`11 of the present invention.
`
`It would be known by one of ordinary skill in the art that
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 4
`
`expanded graphite has larger volume expansion than any of the conductive agents
`
`listed above, as recited in claim 1 of the present invention. Schmidt teachesthat the
`
`expanded graphite can be formedbytreating a natural graphite with concentrated
`
`sulfuric acid and concentrated nitric acid (Paragraph 0038), as recited in claim 11 of the
`
`present invention. Schmidt also teachesthat a variety of types of expanded graphite
`
`can be used, whichis discussed in the examples.
`
`It would have been knownbyone of
`
`ordinary skill in the art that these types of expanded graphite have a particle size
`
`between 1 and 500 microns and an expansion volume between 10 and 300 mL/g, as
`
`recited in claim 10 of the present invention.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective
`
`filing date of the present invention to have included an expanded graphite in the positive
`
`electrode active material layer of Shiozaki, in addition to the conductive agent, because
`
`Schmidt teaches that this material improves the number of cycles of charge/discharge
`
`that can be performed using the battery without losing capacity.
`
`It also would have
`
`been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have included the expanded graphite in
`
`the amount of 1-75 wt% because Schmidt teaches that this amount allowsfor the
`
`improvement of battery capacity.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in
`
`the art that the expanded graphite could be made bytreating natural graphite with
`
`concentrate sulfuric acid and concentrated nitric acid because Schmidt teaches that this
`
`is a common technique for forming this material. Finally, it would have been obvious to
`
`one of ordinary skill in the art to have used an expanded graphite having a particle size
`
`of 1-500 microns and an expansion volume of 10-300 mL/g because Schmidt teaches
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 5
`
`that this results in improved properties of the electrode and improved capacity of the
`
`battery.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 1, 2 and 4-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over Shiozaki (JP Publication 2016-127000) in view of Kuzuo (JP Publication 2001-
`
`332245).
`
`Shiozaki discloses a secondary battery comprising a positive electrode, a
`
`negative electrode, and a non-aqueous electrolyte, wherein the positive electrode
`
`comprises a current collector, a protective layer comprising a conductive material and
`
`inorganic compound, and an active material layer (Paragraphs 0012, 0016, 0022,
`
`0023), as recited in claims 1 and 2 of the present invention. Shiozaki also discloses that
`
`the content of the inorganic compoundin the protective layer is 90-99 wt% (Paragraph
`
`0023), as recited in claims 1 and 2 of the present invention. Shiozaki teaches that the
`
`protective layer has a thickness of 1-5 microns (Paragraph 0022), as recited in claims 4
`
`and 5 of the present invention. Shiozaki also teachesthat the inorganic compound can
`
`be manganeseoxide, silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, and aluminum oxide (Paragraph
`
`0023), as recited in claims 6 and 7 of the present invention.
`
`Shiozaki fails to disclose that a thermally expandable material, different from a
`
`conductive material, is present in the cathode and has larger volume expansion than the
`
`conductive material, that the expandable material is present in an amountof 0.1-5
`
`mass%, or 0.1-1 mass%.
`
`Kuzuo discloses a positive electrode of a battery comprising: a current collector
`
`and an electrode mixture on the current collector, wherein the electrode mixture or a
`
`layer between the electrode mixture layer and current collector can comprise a heat
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 6
`
`expandable microcapsule in an amount of 0.01-5 wt% (Paragraphs 0010 and 0021), as
`
`recited in claims 1, 2, 8 and 9 of the present invention. Kuzuo also discloses that the
`
`electrode mixture can comprise a conductive agent, such as carbon black (Paragraph
`
`0021).
`
`It would have been knownby one ofordinary skill in the art that a heat
`
`expandable microcapsule would have a larger volume expansion than carbon black, as
`
`recited in claims 1 and 2 of the present invention.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective
`
`filing date of the present invention to have included an expandable microcapsule in the
`
`protective layer or active material layer of Shiozaki, in addition to the conductive agent,
`
`because Kuzuo teaches that this material protects the electrode from high temperatures
`
`and overheating.
`
`It also would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to
`
`have included the expandable microcapsules in the amount of 0.01-5 wt% because
`
`Kuzuo teaches that this amount allows for effective protection from heat without being
`
`detrimental to other properties of the electrode.
`
`5.
`
`Claims 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Shiozaki (JP Publication 2016-127000) in view of Kuzuo (JP Publication 2001-332245)
`
`as applied to claims 1, 2 and 4-9 above, and further in view of Schmidt (U.S. Patent
`
`Publication 2013/0164635).
`
`The teachings of Shiozaki and Kuzuo have been discussedin paragraph 4
`
`above. Shiozaki states that the conductive material can be carbon black, acetylene
`
`black, ketjen black or graphite (Paragraph 0019), as recited in claim 11 of the present
`
`invention.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 7
`
`Shiozaki and Kuzuo fail to disclose that expanded graphite could be an
`
`expandable material used in the positive electrode, that an average particle size of the
`
`expanded graphite is 1-500 microns and the expansion volume is 10-300 m/g, and that
`
`expanded graphite is formed by treating a natural graphite with concentrated sulfuric
`
`acid and concentrated nitric acid.
`
`Schmidt discloses a lithium sulfur secondary battery comprising: a cathode, an
`
`anode and electrolyte, wherein the cathode comprises sulfur, 1-75 wt% of an expanded
`
`graphite and further conductive agents (Paragraph 0012). Schmidt teaches that the
`
`expanded graphite can be formedbytreating a natural graphite with concentrated
`
`sulfuric acid and concentrated nitric acid (Paragraph 0038), as recited in claims 11 and
`
`13 of the present invention. Schmidt also teachesthat a variety of types of expanded
`
`graphite can be used, whichis discussed in the examples.
`
`It would have been known
`
`by one of ordinary skill in the art that these types of expanded graphite have a particle
`
`size between 1 and 500 microns and an expansion volume between 10 and 300 mL/g,
`
`as recited in claims 10 and 12 of the present invention.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective
`
`filing date of the present invention that an expanded graphite could also be usedin the
`
`positive electrode of Shiozaki because Schmidt teaches that this material improves the
`
`number of cycles of charge/discharge that can be performed using the battery without
`
`losing capacity.
`
`It also would have been obvious to one ofordinary skill in the art that
`
`the expanded graphite could be made bytreating natural graphite with concentrate
`
`sulfuric acid and concentrated nitric acid because Schmidt teaches thatthis is a
`
`common technique for forming this material. Finally, it would have been obvious to one
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 8
`
`of ordinary skill in the art to have used an expanded graphite having a particle size of 1-
`
`500 microns and an expansion volume of 10-300 mL/g because Schmidt teaches that
`
`this results in improved properties of the electrode and improved capacity of the battery.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`6.
`
`Applicant’s arguments, filed 8/10/2021, have been fully considered and are
`
`persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, due to the
`
`amendments made to the claims, a new ground(s)of rejection is made in view of newly
`
`found prior art references.
`
`Applicants argue that Shiozakifails to disclose that the active material layer or
`
`protective layer comprise both a conductive material and an expandable material, and
`
`that the expandable material has larger volume expansion than the conductive material.
`
`The references, Kuzuo and/or Schmidt, are now combined with Shiozaki to teach either
`
`an expandable microcapsule or an expanded graphite that can be added to either a
`
`positive electrode active material mixture or a layer in between an active material layer
`
`and a current collector. Kuzuo and Schmidt teach that these are in addition to a
`
`conductive agent, such as carbon black.
`
`It would have been knownbyone of ordinary
`
`skill in the art that expandable microcapsules and expanded graphite have a larger
`
`volume expansion than carbon black. Additionally, Kuzuo teaches that the expandable
`
`microcapsulesprotect the battery from overheating. Thus, Kuzuo and/or Schmidt
`
`combined with Shiozaki teach everylimitation of claims 1 and 2 of the presentinvention.
`
`Regarding the new claims, Schmidt teaches everylimitation of the properties of
`
`the expanded graphite.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 9
`
`Conclusion
`
`7.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortenedstatutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the eventafirst replyis filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date ofthis final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`8.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to BRITTANY L RAYMOND whosetelephone number is
`
`(571)272-6545. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9 am-5 pm.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-basedcollaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Cynthia Kelly can be reached on 571-272-1526. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/580,195
`Art Unit: 1722
`
`Page 10
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is
`
`available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,
`
`visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-
`
`center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For
`
`additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197
`
`(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`BRITTANY L. RAYMOND
`Examiner
`
`Art Unit 1722
`
`/BRITTANY L RAYMOND/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket