throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/587,961
`
`09/30/2019
`
`Chong Soon LIM
`
`735256.414C1
`
`9936
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`PEREZ FUENTES, LUIS M
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2481
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`06/25/2020
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-18 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`CC) Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) O Claim(s)___is/are objected to.
`C) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)C The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 09/30/2019 is/are: a)(¥) accepted or b)( objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`cc) None ofthe:
`b)LJ Some**
`a)Y) All
`1.4) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.4) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 99/30/2019; 02/18/2020)
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20200619
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/587,961
`LIM etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`LUIS PEREZ-FUENTES
`2481
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 09/30/2019.
`LC} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)(J This action is FINAL. 2b))This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\(Z Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/587,961
`Art Unit: 2481
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`This communication is being filed in response to the submission having a mailing date
`7.
`of (09/30/2019) in which a (3) month Shortened Statutory Period for Response has been set.
`
`Upon entry, claims (1 -18) stand pending on this application, of which (1, 7 and 13) are
`Z.
`independent claims.
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AlA Status
`
`filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined underthe
`The present application,
`3.
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) that were submitted on (09/30/2019 and
`4.
`02/18/2020) is/are in compliance wth the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the
`information disclosure statement have been considered by the examiner.
`
`Specification
`
`The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine
`5.
`the presenceof all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting
`any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification.
`
`The submitted Drawings on date (09/30/2019) have been accepted and considered
`6.
`under the 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Drawings
`
`Claim Rejections
`
`35 USC § 103 rejection
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`7.
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AlIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection wil not be considered anew ground of
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the
`same undereither status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis
`for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwthstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the mannerin which the invention was made.
`
`The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ
`7.1.
`459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under
`35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
`1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claimsat issue.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/587,961
`Art Unit: 2481
`
`Page 3
`
`3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinentart.
`4. Considering objective evidence presentin the application indicating obviousness or non-obviousness.
`
`Claims (1 -18) are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Leannec;
`8.2.
`et al (“Asymmetric Coding Units in QTBT’. hereafter “Leannec”,
`in view of Chien; et al. (US
`9,532,058; hereafter “Chien’).
`
`Claim 7. An image decoder comprising: Leannec discloses the invention substantially as
`claimed. Leannec teaches the principles of quad-tree methodology, comprising (e.g. QTBT
`methodology for block spitting in accordance with JVET proposal, as shown in Fig.
`f. The
`capers further cresents an actcditional asymmetric binary partitioning of the CUs and an
`associaled syntax, specificaily directed fo block-partiioning for sizes higher and/or mullipie of
`3, either in any of the vertical or horizontal directions, as shown in Figs. (2 3}, in order to
`improve OTBT coding efficiency even further: [Leanmec; pag. T-2.f
`faking the teachings of Learinec as a whole, and considering the basics and scientific
`purpose of fis papers, iis note thai some ofthe components as claimed are missed and/or
`not fully disciosed.
`in a similar led of endeavor, Chien teaches a codec (encoder and decoder} device of
`figs. (7, 3, &) and melnod of Figs. (7, &), in cormplain wih the lalesViegacy codec slandards,
`empioying “quacd-tree” techniques, applicable to square and non-square suo-block shapes,
`as shown in Figs. 2; including both iuma and chroma sampies; alsa in vertical and horizontal
`directions, as also shown in Figs. 2; (Chien; Summary; Cal 9 -10))}
`a circuitry; and a memery coupled to ine circuttry; wherein the circuitry, in
`operation: (e.g. see structure of Figs. (3, 6); f[Chien; Col 12; 18])
`soliis a block of a picture into a plurality of sub blocks (e.g. see partition unit (o5)
`Figs. (3. 6}; [(Chien}) in a first direction using a first partition mode; and (e.g. direction of
`the iargel partition; Fig. 2; Chien; Col 10; 77))
`decodes the plurality of sub Blocks, (e.g. see decoder in Figs. (3. 6); [Chren}}
`wherein, when ihe block is sized N pixels by 2N pixeis and the first direction is along
`ihe 2N pixels, N being an integer, (e.g. see similar in Figs. 2; iChien; Col. 10; 11)
`the first partition mode includes splitting the Block into the plurality of sub
`Biocks including at least one sub block sized N/4 pixels by 2N pixels, (e.g. see sindar in
`Figs. 2: fChien; Col 1G; 17
`and exciudes splitting the block into two sub Glocks sized N/2 pixels By 2N
`pixels; fe.g. see simular in Figs. 2; iChien; Col. 10; 71}
`Therefore,
`it would fave been obvious to ane skilled in the art before the effective
`filing dale af the claimed invention,
`to modify the teachings of Leannec with the system of
`Chien in order to (e.g. more efficient codec techniques, improving the video quality; }Chien:
`summary].}
`
`Claim 2. Leannec/Chien discloses - The image decoder according to ciaim 1, wherein the
`first partition mode includes splitting the Glock info two sub blocks sized N/4 pixels by
`aN pixels and ene sub Block sized N/2 pixels by 2N pixels. (The same rationale and
`mativation apolies as given for the claim 7. in addition see Figs. 2 in both Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Claim 3. Leannec/Chien discloses - The image decoder according to claim 2, wherein the
`first partition mode includes splitting the Block into a first sub Block sized N/4 pixels
`by 2N pixels, a second sub block sized N/2 pixels By 2N pixels, and a third sub Block
`sized N/4 pixels by 2N pixels, wherein ihe second suO Block is interposed between the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/587,961
`Art Unit: 2481
`
`Page 4
`
`first sub block and the third sub Bioek. (The same rationale and motivation applies as
`given for the claim 7, in addilian see Figs. 2 in both Leannec/Chien}
`
`Claim 4, Leannec/Chien discloses - The image deceder according to claim 1, wherein the
`first direction is a vertical direction or a herizantal direction. (The same rationale and
`motivation applies as given for the claim |. in addiion see analogous vertical and horizontal
`direction soll techniques in at least Figs. 2 in boln Leannec/Chien}
`
`Cigim & Leannec/Chien discloses - The image deceder according to claim 1, wherein the
`first partition mode inciudes splitting the block inte one sub biecksized N/4 pixels By
`2M pixels and one sub block sized 3N/4 pixels by 2N pixels. (The same rationale and
`mativation apolies as given for the claim 7. in addition see Figs. 2 in both Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Ciain &. Leannec/Chien discloses - The image decoder according to claim 1, wherein the
`ciroullry, in operation: parses a parameter indicative of ihe firsi partition mode; (e.g.
`see analogous parser unl (35) in at least Figs. (3, 6); fChien})}
`
`Ciaim 7. Leannec/Chien discloses - An image decoder comprising:
`an entropy decoder which, in operation, receives and decodes an encoded
`bitstream (e.g. see encoded data IN, parser unit (35); Figs. (GS, 6}; [{Chien].) to obtain
`quantized transform coefficients (e.g. see quantizer uni (54); Figs. (3, 6); [(Chien]) anda
`parameter indicative of a partition mode; (e.g. see pariilion mode incicaior (182) in
`decoder (30), Figs. (3, 6); (Chien!)
`& Blockpartition determiner which, in operation, derives a partition mode using
`the parameter; (e.g. see partition mode indicator (182) in decoder (30), Figs. (3, 6); [Cmen]}
`an inverse quantizer and transformer which, in operation, inverse quantizes the
`quantized transtorm coefficients to obtain transform coetticients and inverse
`transforms the transform coetlicients io obtain residuais; (e.g. see inverse quantizer
`(86). Figs. (3, 6) [Chien]}
`an adder which, in operation, adds the residuais outputied from the linverse
`quantizer and transformer and predictions outputied from a prediction controller io
`recenstruct Blocks; and (e.g. see adder (90), Figs. (3, 6): [Chien].}
`the predictien controller coupled to an inter predictor, an intra predictor, and a
`memory, wherein the inter predictor, in operation, generates a prediction of a current
`block (e.g. prediction mociule (81) including spatioiemp Glocks (82, 84), Figs. (3, 6); [Chien]
`based on a reference biock in a decoded reference picture; (e.g. see reference
`memory (92), Figs. (3, 6); (Chien)}
`and the intra predictor, in operation, generates a prediction of a current black
`based on an encoded reference Block in a current picture, wherein the block pariitien
`deierminer, in operation:
`(2.9. prediction module (81) including spatiatemp blocks (2,
`84}, Figs. (3, Gi; [Chien}}
`soliis a block of a picture into a plurality of sub blocks in a first direction using
`a first partition mode; and (e.g. see Figs. 2 in both Leannec/Chien.}
`decodes the plurality of sub Blocks, wherein, when the Block is sized Ni pixels
`by 2M pivels and the first direction is along the 2N pixels, N being an infeger, (e.g. see
`Figs. 2 in both Leannec/Chien.}
`the first partition mode includes splitting the black inte the plurality of sub
`blocks including at least one sub Block sized N/4 pixels by 2N pixels, and excludes
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/587,961
`Art Unit: 2481
`
`Page 5
`
`splitting the Block into two sub blocks sized N/2 pixels by 2N pixels; (e.g. see Figs. 2 in
`both Leannec/Ghien. The same motivation apolies as given to claim 1 above.)
`
`Claim & Leannec/Chien discloses - The image deceder according to claim 7, wherein the
`first partition mode includes splitting the block inte two sub blocks sized N/4 pixels by
`aN pixels and one sub block sized N/2 pixels by 2N pixels. (The samerationaie and
`motivation applies as given for the claims (1 and 2) See also Pigs. 2 in both Leannec/Ciien.}
`
`Cigim 9 Leannec/Chien discloses - The image deceder according to claim & wherein the
`first partion mode includes splitting the block inte a first sub block sized N/4 pixels
`by 42N pixels, a second sub block sized Nie pixels by 2N pixels, and a third sub Block
`sized N/é pixels by 2N pixels, wherein the second sub block is interposed between the
`first sub block and the third sub bloce.
`(The same rationaie and motivation anoles as
`given for the claims (7 and 3). See aise Figs. 2 in both Leannec/Chien}
`
`Claim 70. Leannec/Chien discloses - The image decoder according to claim 7, wherein
`the first direction is a vertical direction or a herizontal direction. (The same rationale
`and motivation aoniies as given tor the claims 7 and 4. in addition see also Figs. 2 in Both
`Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Claim 77. Leannec/Chien discloses - The image decoder according to claim 7, wherein
`the first partition mode includes apliiling the Biock into one sub block sized N/4 pixeis
`by 2N pixels and one sub block sized 3N/4 pixels by 2N pixels. (The same rationale and
`motivation apoles as given for the claims 1 and 5. See also Figs. 2 in bath Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Claim iz. Leannec/Chien discloses - The image decoder according te claim 7, wherein
`ine entropy decoder, in operation: parses a parameter indicative of the first partition
`mrode.
`(The same rationale and motivation anplies as given for the ciaims f and 6 See also
`Figs. Zin both Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Claim 13. Leannec/Ghien discloses - A deceding method comprising:
`splitting @ block of a picture into a plurality of sub blocks in a first direction
`using a rst partition mode; and
`decoding the glurality of sub Blocks, Lowherein, when the block is sized N pixels
`by 2N pixels and ihe lirst direction is along the 2N pixels, N being an integer,
`ihe lirst pariiion mode includes splitting the block into the plurality of sub
`blocks including al least one sub Glock sized N/4 pixels by 2N pixels,
`and excludes splitting the block inte two iSsub blocks sized NV2 pixels by 2N
`pixels. (Current lists all ihe same elements as described in claim 7 and & above, bul in
`“decoder-method’ form, and is/are therelore rejected on the same premise.)
`
`Claim 14, Leannec/Chien discioses - The decoding method according toe claim 73,
`wherein the tirst partition mode includes solitting the block into two sub Blocks sized
`AV? pixels by 2N pixels and one sub blocx sized N/2 pixels by 2N pixels. (The same
`rationale and motivation apnites as given for the claims (7 and 2). in addition see Figs. 2 in
`both Leannec/Chien.}
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/587,961
`Art Unit: 2481
`
`Page 6
`
`Claim 1& Leannec/Chien discioses - The decoding method according to claim 74,
`wherein the frst pariilion mode includes solitting the block inte 2 first sub block sized
`N‘4 pixels by 2N pixels, a second sub block sized N/2 pixels by 2N pixels, and a third
`suo Block sized N/4 pixels by 2N pixels, wherein the second sub block is interposed
`28 between the first sub Block and the third sub Block. (The same rationaie and
`motivation applies as given for ihe claims (1 and 3). in addilion see Figs. 2 in both
`Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Claim 16. Leannec/Ghien discloses - The decoding methed according te claim 13,
`wherein the first direction is a vertical direction or a horizontal direction. (The same
`rationale and mativation anphes as given for the claims (71 and 4). In addition see Figs. 2 in
`both Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Ciain 17. Leannec/Chien discioses - The decoding method according to claim 13,
`wherein the first partilfon mode includes splitting the biock info one sub block sized
`(4 pixels Soy 2N pixeis and one sul Block sized 3N/4 pixela by 2N pixels. (The same
`rationale and mativation anphes as given for the claims (7 and 3). In addition see Figs. 2 in
`both Leannec/Chien.}
`
`Claim 18 Leannec/Chien discloses - The decoding methed according te claim 13,
`comprising: parsing @ parameter indicative of the first partition mode. (The same
`rationale and motivation apolies as given for ihe claims ( and 6) in addition see Figs. 2 in
`both Leannec/Chien}
`
`Prior Art citation
`
`The followng List of PA, made of record and not relied upon, is considered pertinent
`70.
`to Applicant's disclosure:
`
`10.1. Patent documentation:
`
`US 9532058 B2
`US 20190222841
`US 20170347128
`US 20170347096
`US 20170272750
`US 20150043641
`
`Chien;etal.
`Panusopone,;etal.
`Panusopone;et al.
`Hong;etal.
`An;et al.
`Gamei;,et al.
`
`HO4N19/1 76; HO4N19/71;
`HO4N19/119; HO4N19/70; HO4N19/96
`HO4N19/1 74; HO4N19/70; HO4N19/96
`HO4N19/1 19; HO4N19/1 72; HO4N19/70;
`HO04N19/147; HO4N19/96; HO4N19/119;
`H04N19/50; HO4N19/103; HO4N19/649;
`
`10.2. Non Patent Literature;
`
`_ Asymmetric coding unit in QTBT; Leannec; Oct-2016;
`_ Local-constrained quadtree plus binary tree block partition structure; Wang; 2016;
`_ Effective Quaadtree Plus Binary Tree Block Partition Decision; Wang; et al; May-11-2017;
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from Examiner
`171.
`should be directed to LUIS PEREZ-FUENTES(luis.perez-fuentes@uspto.gov) whose phone
`numberis (571) 270 -1168. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8am-
`5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccesstul, the examiner's
`supervisor, WILLIAM VAUGHNcan be reached on (571) 272-3922. The fax and phone
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/587,961
`Art Unit: 2481
`
`Page 7
`
`numberfor the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 272 -
`1168. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for the published
`applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for
`unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about
`the PAIR system,http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on accessto the
`Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-
`free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or
`access to the automated information system, please call (800)786-9199 (USA/CANADA)or
`(571)272- 1000.
`
`/LUIS PEREZ-FUENTES/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket