`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/614,393
`
`11/18/2019
`
`TETSUYA YAMAMOTO
`
`731456.559USPC
`
`5206
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`CHANG, YU-WEN
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2413
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`07/16/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`21-40 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 21-40 is/are rejected.
`(1 Claim(s)__is/are objectedto.
`C} Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)(J accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)1) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 04/14/2021.
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20210712
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/614,393
`YAMAMOTOetal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`YU-WEN CHANG
`2413
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 06 July 2021.
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`2.
`
`The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/14/2021 is in
`
`compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure
`
`statement is being considered by the examiner.
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`3.
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot
`
`in view of new grounds ofrejection.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`4.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103)is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 3
`
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the
`
`claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was
`
`commonly ownedasof the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any
`
`evidenceto the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to
`
`point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly
`
`ownedas ofthe effectivefiling date of the later invention in order for the examiner to
`
`consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2)
`
`prior art against the later invention.
`
`Claims 21-22, 24-29, 31-32 and 34-39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Papasakellariou (US 2018/0310257, relying on the provisional
`
`application 62/490,835) in view of Gao et al. (US 2019/0174430).
`
`Regarding Claim 21, Papasakellariou teaches a terminal comprising: circuitry,
`
`which, in operation ([0029] FIG. 17 illustrates an example PUCCH structure for
`
`transmitting HARQ-ACK information or SR information), generates, based on sequence
`
`selection, uplink control information including HARQ-ACK (hybrid automatic repeat
`
`request acknowledgement and negative acknowledgment) for downlink data ([0086]
`
`UCI includes hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement (HARQ-ACk)
`
`information; [0252] a PUCCH structure for conveying HARQ-ACK with one bit or two
`
`bits uses CAZAC sequenceselection. When the UE has one HARQ-ACK bit to transmit
`
`and the UE is not configured to transmit SR, the UE canusea first cyclic shift of a
`
`CAZAC sequenceor a secondcyclic shift of the CAZAC sequence to convey an ACK or
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 4
`
`a NACK,respectively. Similar, when the UE has two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit and
`
`the UE is not configured to transmit SR, the UE can usea first, second, third, or fourth
`
`cyclic shift of a CAZAC sequence; [0253] A first design for multiplexing HARQ-ACK and
`
`a single SR bit in a same PUCCH is to use additional two or four cyclic shifts (referred
`
`to SR cyclic shifts), wnen the UE has one or two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit
`
`respectively, to transmit HARQ-ACK when the UE also hasa positive SR to transmit;
`
`otherwise, when the UE has a negative SR to transmit, the UE usesthe twoor four
`
`cyclic shifts associated with the HARQ-ACK transmission (referred to as HARQ-ACK
`
`cyclic shifts)); and
`
`a transmitter, which, in operation ([0085] A UE transmits data information or UCI
`
`through a respective physical UL shared channel (PUSCH) or a physical UL control
`
`channel (PUCCH)), transmits the uplink control information using a physical uplink
`
`control channel (PUCCH) of one symbol ([0227] operation in high carrier frequencies,
`
`such as in millimeter wave bands, can be associated with large transmission BWs and
`
`PUCCH transmissions over a large BW andin only one symbol of a slot; [0245] A
`
`PUCCH transmission can be over one symbol or over multiple symbols with or without
`
`frequency hopping; [0273] the gNB can configure the UE with a SCS of 15 KHz, a
`
`PUCCH resource that spans 1 slot symbol in time),
`
`wherein a sequencefor the uplink control information including the HARQ-ACK ([0252]
`
`When the UE has one HARQ-ACK bit to transmit and the UE is not configured to
`
`transmit SR, the UE can useafirst cyclic shift of a CAZAC sequence or a secondcyclic
`
`shift of the CAZAC sequence to convey an ACK or a NACK,respectively. Similar, when
`
`the UE has two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit and the UE is not configured to transmit SR,
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 5
`
`the UE can useafirst, second, third, or fourth cyclic shift of a CAZAC sequence) is
`
`different from a sequencefor the uplink control information including both the HARQ-
`
`ACK and a scheduling request ([0253] A first design for multiplexing HARQ-ACK and a
`
`single SR bit in a same PUCCH is to use additional two or four cyclic shifts (referred to
`
`SR cyclic shifts), when the UE has one or two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit respectively,
`
`to transmit HARQ-ACKwhen the UE also has a positive SR to transmit; otherwise,
`
`when the UE has a negative SR to transmit, the UE usesthe twoor four cyclic shifts
`
`associated with the HARQ-ACK transmission (referred to as HARQ-ACK cyclic shifts)).
`
`However, Papasakellariou does not teach a transmission power of the uplink
`
`control information does not depend on whether the uplink control information includes
`
`the scheduling requestor not.
`
`In an analogous art, Gao teach a transmission power of the uplink control
`
`information does not depend on whether the uplink control information includes the
`
`scheduling requestor not ([0168] the target transmission power of the sPUCCH may be
`
`determined to be Pspuccu-1 by using formulas (2-1) and (2-2) ...
`
`Pspuccn(i) = min{Pemax. c(i), Po_ spuccH + PLe + 10logi0(Mspucct.o(i)) + Arr.c(i) + Ar_spuccn(F) + g(i)}
`
`(2-2)).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the
`
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined Gao’s method with
`
`Papasakellariou’s method sothat the efficiency of the power amplifier can be improved
`
`with a lower peak-to-average-power-ratio. Thus, the performance of the system can be
`
`improved.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 6
`
`Regarding Claim 22, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao, specifically
`
`Papasakellariou teaches the numberof bits of the HARQ-ACK is 1 or 2 ([0252] a
`
`PUCCH structure for conveying HARQ-ACK with one bit or two bits uses CAZAC
`
`sequence selection).
`
`Regarding Claim 24, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao, specifically
`
`Papasakellariou teaches the sequence is a sequenceincluding a cyclic shift or a
`
`sequence defined by a cyclic shift ([0252] When the UE has one HARQ-ACK bit to
`
`transmit and the UE is not configured to transmit SR, the UE can usea first cyclic shift
`
`of a CAZAC sequenceor a second cyclic shift of the CAZAC sequence to convey an
`
`ACK or a NACK, respectively. Similar, when the UE has two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit
`
`and the UE is not configured to transmit SR, the UE can useafirst, second, third, or
`
`fourth cyclic shift of a CAZAC sequence; [0253] A first design for multiplexing HARQ-
`
`ACK and a single SR bit in a same PUCCH is to use additional two or four cyclic shifts).
`
`Regarding Claim 25, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao, specifically
`
`Papasakellariou teaches a sequencefor the uplink control information including ACK
`
`(acknowledgement) as the HARQ-ACKis different from a sequencefor the uplink
`
`control information including NACK (negative acknowledgment) as the HARQ-ACK
`
`([0252] When the UE has one HARQ-ACK bit to transmit and the UE is not configured
`
`to transmit SR, the UE can usea first cyclic shift of a CAZAC sequence or a second
`
`cyclic shift of the CAZAC sequence to convey an ACK or a NACK,respectively).
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 7
`
`Regarding Claim 26, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao, specifically
`
`Papasakellariou teaches a physical resource block wherethe uplink control information
`
`including both the HARQ-ACK and the scheduling requestis transmitted is same as a
`
`physical resource block where the uplink control information including the HARQ-ACK is
`
`transmitted ([0225] Nsymp¥4 symbols 1710 are used for transmitting HARQ-ACK
`
`information 1720 or RS 1730 in a RB. HARQ-ACK bits b 1740 modulate 1750 a CAZAC
`
`sequence 1760 using binary phase shift keying (BPSK) or quaternary phase shift keying
`
`(QPSK) modulation. A modulated CAZAC sequenceis transmitted after performing an
`
`IFFT 1770. A RSis transmitted through an unmodulated CAZAC sequence. For SR
`
`transmission, b=-1. A UE can transmit both HARQ-ACK and SR in a same slot by
`
`selecting a resource configured for SR transmission and transmitting HARQ-ACK
`
`information).
`
`Regarding Claim 27, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao, specifically
`
`Papasakellariou teaches the number of sequences assigned to one terminalis 4 for the
`
`HARQ-ACK of1 bit ([0252] When the UE has one HARQ-ACK bit to transmit and the
`
`UE is not configured to transmit SR, the UE can usea first cyclic shift of a CAZAC
`
`sequence or a secondcyclic shift of the CAZAC sequence to convey an ACK ora
`
`NACK,respectively; [0253] A first design for multiplexing HARQ-ACK and a single SR
`
`bit in a same PUCCH is to use additional twoor four cyclic shifts (referred to SR cyclic
`
`shifts), when the UE has one or two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit respectively, to
`
`transmit HARQ-ACK when the UE also hasa positive SR to transmit (i.e., 4 sequences
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 8
`
`are: a first cyclic shift of a CAZAC sequence, a secondcyclic shift, additional two
`
`cyclic shifts)), and
`
`the number of sequences assigned to one terminalis 8 for the HARQ-ACK of2 bits
`
`([(0252] when the UE has two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit and the UE is not configured
`
`to transmit SR, the UE can useafirst, second, third, or fourth cyclic shift of a CAZAC
`
`sequence; [0253] A first design for multiplexing HARQ-ACK anda single SR bit ina
`
`same PUCCH is to use additional two or four cyclic shifts (referred to SR cyclic shifts),
`
`when the UE has one or two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit respectively, to transmit
`
`HARQ-ACK when the UE also hasa positive SR to transmit (i.e., 8 sequences are: a
`
`first, second, third, or fourth cyclic shift, additional four cyclic shifts)).
`
`Regarding Claim 28, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao, specifically
`
`Papasakellariou teaches wherein in transmission of both HARQ-ACK and a scheduling
`
`request, the uplink control information is generated using one mode out of: a mode
`
`using the sequencefor the uplink control information including both the HARQ-ACK and
`
`the scheduling request ([0253] A first design for multiplexing HARQ-ACK anda single
`
`SR bit in a same PUCCH is to use additional two or four cyclic shifts (referred to SR
`
`cyclic shifts), when the UE has one or two HARQ-ACK bits to transmit respectively, to
`
`transmit HARQ-ACK when the UE also has a positive SR to transmit); and a mode
`
`using both a sequencefor the uplink control information including the HARQ-ACK and a
`
`sequencefor the uplink control information including the scheduling request ([0238] The
`
`UE can also be configured whether to jointly or separately transmit SR and HARQ-
`
`ACK/CSI. Separate transmission can apply, for example, when SR and HARQ-ACK/CSI
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 9
`
`have different reception reliability requirements and particularly when SR has higher
`
`reception reliability requirements than HARQ-ACK/CSI; [0265] The UE behavior
`
`whether to jointly or separately transmit SR and HARQ-ACK/CSI can be configured to
`
`the UE by the gNB or be determined by the UE based on a predetermined or configured
`
`required transmission power differential; [0266] FIG. 20 illustrates a flow chart of a
`
`method 2000 for determination by a UE whether to jointly or separately transmit SR and
`
`HARQ-ACK).
`
`Regarding Claim 29, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao, specifically
`
`Papasakellariou teaches a receiver, which, in operation, receives information related to
`
`a resource of the PUCCH, wherein the uplink control information is generated and
`
`transmitted based on the information ([0265] The UE behavior whether to jointly or
`
`separately transmit SR and HARQ-ACK/CSI can be configured to the UE by the gNB;
`
`[0255] Whenthe SR cyclic shifts are in same frequency resources as the HARQ-ACK
`
`cyclic shifts, the SR cyclic shifts are different than the HARQ-ACK cyclic shifts and all
`
`are cyclic shifts of a same CAZAC sequence. Whenthe SR cyclic shifts are in different
`
`frequency resources than the HARQ-ACK cyclic shifts, the SR cyclic shifts can be same
`
`or different than the HARQ-ACK cyclic shifts and can be cyclic shifts of a same or
`
`different CAZAC sequence).
`
`Regarding Claim 31, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 21.
`
`Regarding Claim 32, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 22.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 10
`
`Regarding Claim 34, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 24.
`
`Regarding Claim 35, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 25.
`
`Regarding Claim 36, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 26.
`
`Regarding Claim 37, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 27.
`
`Regarding Claim 38, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 28.
`
`Regarding Claim 39, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 29.
`
`Claims 23, 30, 33 and 40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Papasakellariou in view of Gao et al. and Nayeb Nazaret al. (US
`
`2020/0067680, relying on the provisional application 62/500,772).
`
`Regarding Claim 23, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao doesnot teach
`
`the number of terminals multiplexed in the same physical resourceblockis up to 6 for
`
`the HARQ-ACK of 1 bit.
`
`In an analogous art, Nayeb Nazar teaches the number of terminals multiplexed in
`
`the same physical resource blockis up to 6 for the HARQ-ACK of1 bit ([0093] If 12
`
`cyclic shifts are available within a PRB, up to six users may be supported in a PUCCH
`
`(e.g., short PUCCH) spanning 1 PRB).
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 11
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the
`
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined Nayeb Nazar’s method
`
`with Papasakellariou’s method so that the error rate for ACK/NACK detection can be
`
`improved with the spacing of the cyclic shift of a UE (Nayeb Nazar [0091]). Moreover, a
`
`maximum possible number of UEs can be multiplexed for PUCCH transmission. Thus,
`
`the system capacity is increased.
`
`Regarding Claim 30, the combination of Papasakellariou and Gao doesnot teach
`
`the information includes information related to a cyclic shift used in the sequence.
`
`In an analogous art, Nayeb Nazar teaches the information includes information
`
`related to a cyclic shift used in the sequence ([(0099] The WTRU mayderive the
`
`resources (e.g., cyclic time shifts of a sequence) over which it may transmit ACK/NACK
`
`and/or SR from a received PUCCH parameter (e.g., a Short PUCCH index such as
`
`NpuccH??ot), The PUCCH parameter may be received from a higherlayer (e.g., from a
`
`network entity) or as part of downlink control information (e.g., in the NR-PDCCH). This
`
`resource index mayindicate at least one of (e.g., both of) a PUCCH region across the
`
`bandwidth or the cyclic shifts that may be allocated to the WTRU for UL signaling).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the
`
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined Nayeb Nazar’s method
`
`with Papasakellariou’s method so that a better coordinated resourceallocation
`
`mechanism can be achieved among different UEs. Moreover, the error rate for
`
`ACK/NACK detection can be improved with the spacing of the cyclic shift of a UE
`
`(Nayeb Nazar [0091)).
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 12
`
`Regarding Claim 33, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 23.
`
`Regarding Claim 40, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as
`
`set forth in Claim 30.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The prior art made of record and notrelied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicant's disclosure.
`
`Nagomi et al. (US 2017/0273071) teaches method for transmitting PUCCH and
`
`sPUCCH.
`
`Falconetti et al. (US 2019/0230596) teaches method for performing power control
`
`of PUCCH.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP
`
`§ 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortenedstatutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the eventafirst replyis filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuantto 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`Page 13
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to YU-WEN CHANG whosetelephone number is
`
`(408)918-7645. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:00am-5:00pm PT.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-basedcollaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO AutomatedInterview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Awww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Un Cho can be reached on 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-
`
`my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on accessto the Private
`
`PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access
`
`to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-
`
`272-1000.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 16/614,393
`Art Unit: 2413
`
`IY.C./
`Examiner, Art Unit 2413
`
`/UN C CHO/
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2413
`
`Page 14
`
`