throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/640,116
`
`02/19/2020
`
`Nobuhiko Hojo
`
`P200158US00
`
`1065
`
`WHDA, LLP
`8500 LEESBURG PIKE
`SUITE 7500
`TYSONS, VA 22182
`
`MERKLING, MATTHEW J
`
`1725
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`06/13/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`Thetime period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`patentmail @ whda.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/640,116
`Examiner
`MATTHEW J MERKLING
`
`Applicant(s)
`Hojo etal.
`Art Unit
`1725
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 5/10/23.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)[¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-4,6,8-14 and 16-18 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C) Claim(s)__ is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-4,6,8-14 and 16-18 is/are rejected.
`1) Claim(s)__is/are objectedto.
`Cj} Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)(] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 2/19/2020 is/are: a)(¥) accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)¥) All
`1.4) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.4.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) (J Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20230607
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`2.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102
`
`and 103 (or as subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory
`
`basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and
`
`the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under eitherstatus.
`
`Specification
`
`3.
`
`The specification and drawings have been reviewed and no clear informalities or objections
`
`have been noted.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`4.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections
`
`set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is
`not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102,if the differences between the claimed invention
`and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinaryskill in the art to which the
`claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention
`was made.
`
`5.
`
`Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 8-14, 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Han (US 2016/0126542) in view of Suyama (US 2017/0279159) and Kawakami (US 2016/0268586).
`
`Regarding claims 1, 13-14 Han discloses a rechargeable battery comprising:
`
`a positive electrode including a positive electrode current collector and a positive electrode
`
`active material layer provided on a surface of the positive electrode current collector (see
`
`paragraph 92 which discloses coating a current collector with a positive electrode mixture);
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`Page 3
`
`a negative electrode including a negative electrode current collector and a negative
`
`electrode active material layer provided on a surface of the negative electrode current collector
`
`(see paragraph 101 whichdiscloses a negative electrode active material coated on a current
`
`collector); and
`
`a non-aqueous electrolyte solution containing a lithium salt (see paragraph 109 which
`
`discloses a lithium salt dissolved in a non-aqueous electrolyte), wherein:
`
`the positive electrode active material layer contains one or more positive electrode active
`
`materials and one or morelithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes (see paragraphs 44-46
`
`whichdisclose coating the active material with LiF and Li3PO4); and
`
`the positive electrode active materials include a lithium transition metal oxide (paragraph
`
`52);
`
`the lithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes include one or morelithium ion-permeable
`
`oxides X;
`
`the oxides X are Li3PO4 (see paragraphs 44-46).
`
`Han teaches a battery with a non-aqueous electrolyte but does not disclose the presence of
`
`an aqueous electrolyte nor doesit teach the claimed concentration.
`
`Suyama also discloses a lithium secondary battery (abstract).
`
`Suyama teachesthat in many Li-ion batteries, a non-aqueous electrolyte (like that of Han) is
`
`used. However, non-aqueous suffer from flammability problems along with a lower energy
`
`density than aqueous electrolytes (paragraph 3). Suyama goeson to teach an aqueous
`
`electrolyte that with the entire solvent being water (paragraph 16) and teachesthat the
`
`concentration of the lithium salt in the electrolyte should be high, such as higher than
`
`10mol/1kg of water (paragraph 16) which overlaps the claimed range.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`Page 4
`
`As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to add an aqueous electrolyte, as suggested by Suyama, to the secondary battery of
`
`Han in order to makefor a higher energy density battery along with a battery that does not
`
`contain a flammable electrolyte. Furthermore, arriving at the claimed range would have been
`
`obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art at the time of the invention.
`
`In the case where the
`
`claimed ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of
`
`obviousness exists (see MPEP §2144.05(I)).
`
`Han teachesa lithium phosphate coating layer including Li3PO4 but does notexplicitly
`
`disclose the claimed composition LixPOy (1<x<3, 3<y<4).
`
`Kawakami also disclosesa lithium phosphate coating layer on a cathode active material (see
`
`abstract).
`
`Kawakami, like Han, teaches the coating is placed on the active material to reduce the
`
`reactions betweenthe active material and the electrolyte (see paragraph 33 of Kawakami and
`
`paragraph 46 of Han). While both Kawakami and Han disclose Li3PO4 as the preferred
`
`composition of the lithium phosphate, Kawakami also discloses that a wider range of
`
`compositions can achieve the same effect, including LixPOy (2<x<4, 3<y<5).
`
`As such,it would have been obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to utilize the wider range of lithium phosphate of Kawakami, which overlaps the
`
`claimed range, in the coating layer of Han. Such a modification is nothing more than a simple
`
`substitution of one knowncoating layer for another to serve the same purpose(shielding active
`
`material from electrolyte reactions) to yield entirely predictable results. Furthermore,arriving
`
`at the claimed range would have been obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art at the time of
`
`the invention.
`
`In the case where the claimed ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by
`
`the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousnessexists (see MPEP §2144.05(1)).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`Page 5
`
`Regarding claim 2, Han further discloses the lithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes cover
`
`at least part of a surface of the positive electrode active materials (see Fig. 1 and 2 where the
`
`coating/electrolyte layer 13 covers active material 10).
`
`Regarding claim 3, Han further discloses the lithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes cover
`
`at least part of the surface of the positive electrode current collector (by being coated on the
`
`current collector, as described in paragraph 92, the outer layer of the solid electrolyte 13 with
`
`inherently cover at least a portion of the current collector).
`
`Regarding claim 4, Han further discloses the positive electrode active material layer further
`
`contains a conductive agent; and the lithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes cover at least part
`
`of a surface of the conductive agent (see paragraph 153 where Han gives an example of the
`
`carbonaceous conductor being mixed with the positive active material and the ion conductor
`
`which will include at least a portion of the carbonaceous material’s outer surface being
`
`covered/in contact with the solid electrolyte).
`
`Regarding claims 6 and 8, Han further discloses the lithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes
`
`include one or more lithium ion-permeable oxides X and compoundY (see claim 1 of Han which
`
`discloses the ion conduction layer and include LiF and Li3PO4).
`
`Regarding claim 9, Han discloses the positive electrode active material layer contains a
`
`condensed polymer of the lithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes; and the polymer contains
`
`the elemental Li, the elemental M?, and the elemental O (such will be the case when the Li3PO4
`
`reacts with the protons in the battery, as described in paragraphs 15-16 of the instant published
`
`application)
`
`Regardingclaims 10-12, Han doesnot explicitly disclose the claimed composition, but does
`
`teach a positive active material. See claim 4 of Han which discloses a composition range which
`
`overlaps the claimed composition range. As such, arriving at the claimed range would have
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`Page 6
`
`been obvious to one ofordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention.
`
`In the case where
`
`the claimed ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of
`
`obviousness exists (see MPEP §2144.05(I)).
`
`Regarding claim 16, Han further discloses the positive electrode active material layer further
`
`contains a binder; and the lithium ion-conducting solid electrolytes cover at least part of a
`
`surface of the conductive agent (see paragraph 153 where Han gives an example of a binder
`
`being mixed with the positive active material and the ion conductor which will include at least a
`
`portion of the carbonaceous material’s outer surface being covered/in contact with the solid
`
`electrolyte).
`
`Regardingclaim 17, Han, as modified above, discloses that the oxides X is 100% LixPOy
`
`(1<x<3, 3<y<A4).
`
`6.
`
`Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han (US
`
`2016/0126542) in view of Suyama (US 2017/0279159) and Kawakami (US 2016/0268586) and applied to
`
`claim 1 above and further in view of Choi (US 2016/0276659).
`
`Regarding claim 18, Han, as modified above, teaches a coating layer on the positive active
`
`material comprising LiF and LixPOy (1<x<3, 3<y<4) but does not teach an additional compound
`
`with a formula of LixSiOy (2<x<4, 3<y<4).
`
`Choi also discloses a cathode active material (see abstract).
`
`Choi, like Han, teaches a coating on a cathode active material comprising Li3PO4 and LiF
`
`(see abstract). Choi goes onto teach that in addition to these compounds,it is beneficial to add
`
`a lithium metal compound such as Li2SiO3 (see claim 4 of Choi). Choi teaches the addition of
`
`this material to the coating layer of the active material in order to improve the battery
`
`characteristics (paragraphs 116 and Table 1).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`Page 7
`
`As such,it would have been obvious to one of ordinaryskill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to add the Li2SiO3 compound of Choi to the coating layer of modified Han in order to
`
`improve the battery characteristics.
`
`Relevant Prior Art
`
`US 2017/0207482 - Coating an active material layer with a solid electrolyte such as Li4Si04
`
`or Li3PO4 (paragraph 99)
`
`US 2017/0179545- Active material with a coating layer comprising Li3PO4 (paragraph 42).
`
`JP 2014154406 A - Discloses an aqueous electrolyte comprising a cathode active material
`
`that is coated with a solid electrolyte.
`
`CN 107565134 A - Discloses exchanging nonaqueous electrolyte with aqueous electrolyte in
`
`the interest of safety.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`7.
`
`Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because
`
`the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for
`
`any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
`
`Conclusion
`
`8.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office
`
`action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the
`
`extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from
`
`the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the eventa first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`Page 8
`
`of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH
`
`shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory
`
`action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing
`
`date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than
`
`SIX MONTHS from the dateofthis final action.
`
`9.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to MATTHEW J MERKLING whosetelephone number is (571)272-9813. The examiner
`
`can normally be reached Monday- Thursday 8am-6pm.
`
`Examiner interviewsare available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use
`
`the USPTO Automated Interview Request(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`Basia Ridley can be reached on 571-272-1453. The fax phone numberfor the organization where this
`
`application or proceedingis assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from
`
`Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To
`
`file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov.Visit
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For additional
`
`questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free). If you would like
`
`assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or
`
`571-272-1000.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/640,116
`Art Unit: 1725
`
`/MATTHEW J MERKLING/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
`
`Page 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket