throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`16/068,117
`
`07/04/2018
`
`Takashi NISHIYAMA
`
`NIIPPOZZSWOUS
`
`1004
`
`MARK D. SARALINO (PAN)
`RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
`1621 EUCLID AVENUE
`19TH FLOOR
`CLEVELAND, OH 44115
`
`MORALES JON ERIC C
`
`ART UNIT
`3792
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/ 1 9/2020
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`
`following e—mail address(es):
`
`ipdoeket@rennerotto.eom
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`0/7709 A0170” Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/068,117
`Examiner
`JON ERIC 0 MORALES
`
`Applicant(s)
`NISHIYAMA etal.
`Art Unit
`AIA (FITF) Status
`3792
`Yes
`
`- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address -
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE g MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing
`date of this communication.
`|f NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1). Responsive to communication(s) filed on 3/3/2020.
`CI A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`2a). This action is FINAL.
`
`2b) D This action is non-final.
`
`3)[:] An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`4):] Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Expade Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`5)
`
`Claim(s) fl is/are pending in the application.
`
`5a) Of the above Claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`
`
`[:1 Claim(ss)
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`8)
`Claim(s 112Is/are rejected
`
`D Claim(ss_) is/are objected to.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`S)
`are subject to restriction and/or election requirement
`[:1 Claim(s
`* If any claims have been determined aflowable. you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPeredback@uspto.gov.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)|:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`is/are: a)[] accepted or b)l:] objected to by the Examiner.
`11)[:] The drawing(s) filed on
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)D Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`
`a)I:l All
`
`b)|:] Some**
`
`c)l:I None of the:
`
`1C] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2C] Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) [3 Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) C] Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date_
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) E] Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) CI Other-
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20200513
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`2.
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use,
`on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed
`invention.
`
`3.
`
`Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by
`
`Hayes et al. (US 9192333), cited previously.
`
`Regarding claim 1, Hayes discloses an obtainer which obtains, on a per unit
`
`period basis, a result of measuring body motion of a user in a sleep time period (column
`
`3 lines 4-11, column 14 lines 15-19, system and methods are also provided for
`
`detecting brain injury secondary to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or
`
`ischemic stroke, or other neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or
`
`schizophrenia, associated with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 3
`
`using current technologies, such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted
`
`tomography. Once SM parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the
`
`parameters are attributed a value and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by
`
`brain injury. Patients having statistically significant dampened sleep movements are
`
`assigned a determination of present brain injury); a determiner which determines, by
`
`comparing, on a per unit time basis, reference data on body motion of a healthy subject
`
`in a sleep time period and the result of measuring obtained by the obtainer, an
`
`occurrence frequency of a unit period in which a magnitude of a difference between the
`
`reference data and the result of the measuring obtained by the obtainer exceeds a
`
`predetermined threshold value (column 3 lines 31 -34, Column 10 lines 20-29, column
`
`14 lines 15-24, The present invention uniquely detects brain injury by comparing Sleep
`
`Movement, SM, normative features of sleep quality related to Sleep Movement
`
`abnormalities characteristic of brain injury, Once SM parameters are identified from the
`
`sensor signals, the parameters are attributed a value and compared to the SM of
`
`populations unaffected by brain injury. Patients having statistically significant dampened
`
`sleep movements are assigned a determination of present brain injury. Comparisons
`
`between the patient sleep parameters are performed using statistical methods.
`
`Preferably, the determination of a threshold value for detection of clinically significant
`
`brain injury is performed by receiver operating characteristic plot analysis, What
`
`constitutes a "sleep period" can be defined based on video or a caregiver sleep diary
`
`with infants, or with adults, a patient sleep diary. FIG. 3 uses a midnight to 5:00 AM
`
`(2400-0500 hours) time period for illustration, but the whole or a part of a sleep period
`
`can be examined provided there is sufficient data) and an outputter which outputs
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 4
`
`dementia information indicating a likelihood that the user is developing a mild cognitive
`
`disorder, the likelihood being based on a determination result of the determiner (column
`
`3 lines 4-11, column 14 lines 15-24, Comparisons between the patient sleep parameters
`
`are performed using statistical methods. Preferably, the determination of a threshold
`
`value for detection of clinically significant brain injury is performed by receiver operating
`
`characteristic plot analysis, system and methods are also provided for detecting brain
`
`injury secondary to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or ischemic stroke, or
`
`other neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or schizophrenia,
`
`associated with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect using current
`
`technologies, such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted tomography.
`
`Once SM parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the parameters are
`
`attributed a value and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by brain injury.
`
`Patients having statistically significant dampened sleep movements are assigned a
`
`determination of present brain injury).
`
`Concerning claim 2, Hayes discloses the reference data is a result of measuring
`
`body motion of the user in the sleep time period at a time when the user is the healthy
`
`subject (column 5 lines 61 -63, polysomnography PSG were compared, patients with
`
`severe TBI had more sleep disturbances than matched healthy "good sleepers).
`
`With respect to claim 3, Hayes discloses wherein the unit period is 24 hours in
`
`length, when the occurrence frequency of the unit period in which the magnitude of
`
`the difference between the reference data and the result of measuring obtained by
`
`the obtainer exceeds the predetermined threshold value exceeds a
`
`predetermined reference frequency, the determiner determines that the user is
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 5
`
`developing the mild cognitive disorder, and when the determiner determines that the
`
`user is developing the mild cognitive disorder, the outputter outputs the dementia
`
`information indicating that the user is developing the mild cognitive disorder (column 3
`
`lines 4-11, column 14 lines 15-19, system and methods are also provided for detecting
`
`brain injury secondary to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or ischemic
`
`stroke, or other neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or
`
`schizophrenia, associated with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect
`
`using current technologies, such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted
`
`tomography. Once SM parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the
`
`parameters are attributed a value and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by
`
`brain injury. Patients having statistically significant dampened sleep movements are
`
`assigned a determination of present brain injury).
`
`With respect to claim 4, Hayes discloses an updater which updates the reference
`
`data to reflect the result of measuring in a unit period in which the magnitude of the
`
`difference between the reference data and the result of measuring obtained by the
`
`obtainer does not exceed the predetermined threshold value, wherein when an
`
`occurrence frequency of a unit period in which a magnitude of a difference between the
`
`reference data updated by the updater and the result of measuring obtained by the
`
`obtainer after the update exceeds the predetermined threshold value exceeds the
`
`predetermined reference frequency, the determiner determines that the user is
`
`developing the mild cognitive disorder (column 5 lines 61-63, column 14 lines 19-24,
`
`polysomnography PSG were compared, patients with severe TBI had more sleep
`
`disturbances than matched healthy "good sleepers. Comparisons between the patient
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 6
`
`sleep parameters are performed using statistical methods. Preferably, the determination
`
`of a threshold value for detection of clinically significant brain injury is performed by
`
`receiver operating characteristic plot analysis).
`
`Regarding claim 5, Hayes discloses a meter which measures body motion of the
`
`user, wherein the obtainer specifies a sleep time period of the user based on a result of
`
`measuring the body motion of the user by the meter, and obtains the result
`
`of measuring in the sleep time period that has been specified (column 10 lines 20-29, a
`
`"sleep period" can be defined based on video or a caregiver sleep diary with infants, or
`
`with adults, a patient sleep diary. FIG. 3 uses a midnight to 5:00 AM (2400-0500 hours)
`
`time period for illustration, but the whole or a part of a sleep period can be examined
`
`provided there is sufficient data. In addition to analysis of sleep periods, algorithms may
`
`be used to identify more idiosyncratic parameters of sleep such as sleep movement
`
`level or intensity. To analyze such parameters a central tendency measure, e.g., a
`
`mean, can be computed as a reference).
`
`Concerning claim 6, Hayes discloses a meter 12 which measures body motion of
`
`the user, wherein the obtainer specifies a sleep time period of the user based on a
`
`result of measuring the body motion of the user by the meter, and obtains the result
`
`of measuring in the sleep time period that has been specified (column 6 lines 59-67,
`
`systems for detecting brain injury may comprise actigraphic device sensors which are
`
`accelerometers (not shown). The accelerometers may be attached to the patient's limbs
`
`or other anatomy expected to be repositioned during sleep, or the accelerometer
`
`sensors may be attached to the sleeping surface in a manner similar to the placement
`
`of pressure sensors), the dementia information output system further comprises a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 7
`
`discerner which discerns whether or not an electrical device used by the user is in a
`
`power-on state (column 6 lines 28-30, The sensor is powered by a battery or other DC
`
`power source and is wired to an oscilloscope for detection of changes to the sensor's
`
`output) ; and a determiner which determines whether or not the user is developing the
`
`mild cognitive disorder based on whether or not the discerner discerns that the
`
`electrical device is in the power-on state in the sleep time period of the user that has
`
`been specified by the obtainer, and the occurrence frequency of the unit period in which
`
`the magnitude of the difference between the reference data and the result of measuring
`
`obtained by the obtainer exceeds the predetermined threshold value (column 10 lines
`
`20-29, a "sleep period" can be defined based on video or a caregiver sleep diary with
`
`infants, or with adults, a patient sleep diary. FIG. 3 uses a midnight to 5:00 AM time
`
`period for illustration, but the whole or a part of a sleep period can be examined
`
`provided there is sufficient data. In addition to analysis of sleep periods, algorithms may
`
`be used to identify more idiosyncratic parameters of sleep such as sleep movement
`
`level or intensity. To analyze such parameters a central tendency measure, e.g., a
`
`mean, can be computed as a reference), and when the determiner determines that the
`
`user is developing the mild cognitive disorder, the outputter outputs the dementia
`
`information indicating that the user is developing the mild cognitive disorder (column 3
`
`lines 4-11, column 14 lines 15-19, system and methods are also provided for detecting
`
`brain injury secondary to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or ischemic
`
`stroke, or other neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or
`
`schizophrenia, associated with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect
`
`using current technologies, such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 8
`
`tomography. Once SM parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the
`
`parameters are attributed a value and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by
`
`brain injury. Patients having statistically significant dampened sleep movements are
`
`assigned a determination of present brain injury).
`
`With respect to claim 7, Hayes discloses wherein when the occurrence frequency
`
`of the unit period in which the magnitude of the difference exceeds the predetermined
`
`threshold value exceeds the predetermined reference frequency and when a frequency
`
`in which the discerner discerns that the electrical device is in the power-on state in the
`
`sleep time period of the user exceeds a prescribed frequency, the determiner
`
`determines that the user is developing the mild cognitive disorder ((column 3 lines 4-11,
`
`column 14 lines 15-19, system and methods are also provided for detecting brain injury
`
`secondary to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or ischemic stroke, or other
`
`neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or schizophrenia, associated
`
`with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect using current technologies,
`
`such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted tomography. Once SM
`
`parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the parameters are attributed a value
`
`and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by brain injury. Patients having
`
`statistically significant dampened sleep movements are assigned a determination of
`
`present brain injury).
`
`Regarding claim 8, Hayes discloses wherein the outputter outputs the dementia
`
`information by presenting the dementia information (column 3 lines 4-11, column 14
`
`lines 15-19, system and methods are also provided for detecting brain injury secondary
`
`to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or ischemic stroke, or other
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 9
`
`neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or schizophrenia, associated
`
`with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect using current technologies,
`
`such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted tomography. Once SM
`
`parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the parameters are attributed a value
`
`and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by brain injury. Patients having
`
`statistically significant dampened sleep movements are assigned a determination of
`
`present brain injury).
`
`Concerning claim 9, Hayes discloses the outputter outputs the dementia
`
`information by transmitting the dementia information to a notification device (column 9
`
`lines 58-63, the data storage device 40 and a display 42 also store and display
`
`processed and analyzed data).
`
`With respect to claim 10, Hayes discloses obtaining, on a per unit period basis, a
`
`result of measuring body motion of a user in a sleep time period (column 3 lines 4-11,
`
`column 14 lines 15-19, system and methods are also provided for detecting brain injury
`
`secondary to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or ischemic stroke, or other
`
`neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or schizophrenia, associated
`
`with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect using current technologies,
`
`such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted tomography. Once SM
`
`parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the parameters are attributed a value
`
`and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by brain injury. Patients having
`
`statistically significant dampened sleep movements are assigned a determination of
`
`present brain injury); determining, by comparing, on a per unit time basis, reference
`
`data on body motion of a healthy subject in a sleep time period and the result of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 10
`
`measuring obtained by the obtainer, an occurrence frequency of a unit period in which a
`
`magnitude of a difference between the reference data and the result of the measuring
`
`obtained by the obtainer exceeds a predetermined threshold value (column 3 lines 31 -
`
`34, Column 10 lines 20-29, column 14 lines 15-24, The present invention uniquely
`
`detects brain injury by comparing Sleep Movement, SM, normative features of sleep
`
`quality related to Sleep Movement abnormalities characteristic of brain injury, Once SM
`
`parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the parameters are attributed a value
`
`and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by brain injury. Patients having
`
`statistically significant dampened sleep movements are assigned a determination of
`
`present brain injury. Comparisons between the patient sleep parameters are performed
`
`using statistical methods. Preferably, the determination of a threshold value for
`
`detection of clinically significant brain injury is performed by receiver operating
`
`characteristic plot analysis, What constitutes a "sleep period" can be defined based on
`
`video or a caregiver sleep diary with infants, or with adults, a patient sleep diary. FIG. 3
`
`uses a midnight to 5:00 AM (2400-0500 hours) time period for illustration, but the whole
`
`or a part of a sleep period can be examined provided there is sufficient data) and
`
`outputting dementia information indicating a likelihood that the user is developing a mild
`
`cognitive disorder based on a determination result of determining the occurrence
`
`(column 3 lines 4-11, column 14 lines 15-24, Comparisons between the patient sleep
`
`parameters are performed using statistical methods. Preferably, the determination of a
`
`threshold value for detection of clinically significant brain injury is performed by receiver
`
`operating characteristic plot analysis, system and methods are also provided for
`
`detecting brain injury secondary to other medical conditions such as neurotoxicity or
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 11
`
`ischemic stroke, or other neurological conditions, such as, for example, Alzheimer's or
`
`schizophrenia, associated with brain injuries which may be similarly difficult to detect
`
`using current technologies, such as, magnetic resonance imaging or computer assisted
`
`tomography. Once SM parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the
`
`parameters are attributed a value and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by
`
`brain injury. Patients having statistically significant dampened sleep movements are
`
`assigned a determination of present brain injury).
`
`Concerning claim 11, Hayes discloses wherein the unit period represents at least
`
`one day, and the unit time represents a plurality of consecutive days (Column 10 lines
`
`20-29, What constitutes a "sleep period" can be defined based on video or a caregiver
`
`sleep diary with infants, or with adults, a patient sleep diary. FIG. 3 uses a midnight to
`
`5:00 AM (2400-0500 hours) time period for illustration, but the whole or a part of a sleep
`
`period can be examined provided there is sufficient data).
`
`Regarding claim 12, Hayes discloses wherein the unit period represents at least
`
`one day, and the unit time represents a plurality of consecutive days (Column 10 lines
`
`20-29, What constitutes a "sleep period" can be defined based on video or a caregiver
`
`sleep diary with infants, or with adults, a patient sleep diary. FIG. 3 uses a midnight to
`
`5:00 AM (2400-0500 hours) time period for illustration, but the whole or a part of a sleep
`
`period can be examined provided there is sufficient data).
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`4.
`
`Applicant's arguments filed 3/3/2020 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive. Examiner finds that determining, by comparing, on a per unit time basis,
`
`reference data on body motion of a healthy subject in a sleep time period and the result
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 12
`
`of measuring obtained by the obtainer, an occurrence frequency of a unit period in
`
`which a magnitude of a difference between the reference data and the result of the
`
`measuring obtained by the obtainer exceeds a predetermined threshold value (column 3
`
`lines 31-34, Column 10 lines 20-29, column 14 lines 15-24, The present invention
`
`uniquely detects brain injury by comparing Sleep Movement, SM, normative features of
`
`sleep quality related to Sleep Movement abnormalities characteristic of brain injury,
`
`Once SM parameters are identified from the sensor signals, the parameters are
`
`attributed a value and compared to the SM of populations unaffected by brain injury.
`
`Patients having statistically significant dampened sleep movements are assigned a
`
`determination of present brain injury. Comparisons between the patient sleep
`
`parameters are performed using statistical methods. Preferably, the determination of a
`
`threshold value for detection of clinically significant brain injury is performed by receiver
`
`operating characteristic plot analysis, What constitutes a "sleep period" can be defined
`
`based on video or a caregiver sleep diary with infants, or with adults, a patient sleep
`
`diary. FIG. 3 uses a midnight to 5:00 AM (2400-0500 hours) time period for illustration,
`
`but the whole or a part of a sleep period can be examined provided there is sufficient
`
`data).
`
`Conclusion
`
`5.
`
`THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time
`
`policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 13
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
`
`6.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to JON ERIC C MORALES whose telephone number is
`
`(571)272—3107. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 830AM-
`
`530PM CST.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Carl Layno can be reached on 571-272—4949. The fax phone number for
`
`the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/068,117
`Art Unit: 3792
`
`Page 14
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571 -272-1 000.
`
`——Examiner, Art Unit 3792
`
`/J.C.M/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 3792
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket