throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`16/838,420
`
`04/02/2020
`
`Noriaki KIDO
`
`733156.560
`
`1080
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`PHUNKULH, BOB A
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2412
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`10/01/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-6 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)____is/are objected to.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)(] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 4/02/2020 is/are: a)(¥) accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)¥) All
`1.4) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 04/02/2020;06/11/2020
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20210927
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`16/838,420
`KIDO etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`BOB A PHUNKULH
`2412
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 04/02/2020.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)L) This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/838,420
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 2
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 1-2, 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`ZONG (US 2019/0014459 A1), in view of LU etal. (US 2018/0063255 A1), hereinafter
`
`LU.
`
`Regarding claim 1, ZONG discloses a camera, comprising:
`
`an image capturing section (smart device 110, see ¥ 0083);
`
`a controller that connects to a server receiving a global Internet Protocol (IP)
`
`address of an Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)-compatible terminal, that receives the
`
`global IP address from the server, and that establishes peer-to-peer (P2P)
`
`communication with the IPv6-compatible terminal (smart camera 110 communicate with
`
`P2P server, see J 0086, and IP packets may be IPv4 or IPv6 compatible, see { 0064);
`
`and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/838,420
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 3
`
`a communicator that transmits image data captured by the image capturing
`
`section to the IPv6-compatible terminal by P2P communication (the smart camera 110
`
`and terminal 120 send data packets, see { 0086).
`
`Although ZONGdisclose performing hole punching by a server instead of the
`
`camera, ZONGfails to explicitly discloses that camera or terminal device performs hole
`
`punching.
`
`In the same field of endeavor, LU discloses when the mobile phone APP wants
`
`to access the NAS, firstly a hole punching processis tried to establish a P2P
`
`(Peer to Peer) connection with the NAS and perform data transmission. If the P2P
`
`connection is unsuccessfully established, data transmission between the mobile phone
`
`APP andthe NASis performed through a relay connection process (see ¥ 0157).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art
`
`before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement LU's teaching in the
`
`camera device taught by ZONGin order to establish a TCP connection between two
`
`peers on the Internet behind NAT devices.
`
`Regarding claim 2, ZONG discloses in a case where an IPv4-compatible terminal
`
`is located within a wireless communication range of a router to which the camerais
`
`connected, the controller establishes P2P communication with the IPv4-compatible
`
`terminal by using a private IP address of the IPv4-compatible terminal (the smart device
`
`110 communication with terminal 120 via router 130, see figure 1).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/838,420
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 4
`
`Regarding claim 5, ZONG discloses in a case where the IPv4-compatible
`
`terminal is located outside the wireless communication range of the router to which the
`
`camera is connected and a UPnP function of the router is usable, the controller
`
`establishes P2P communication with the |Pv4-compatible terminal (the smart device
`
`110 communicate with terminal 120 outside of the local network via router 130, see
`
`figure 1).
`
`Regarding claim 6, ZONG discloses a communication method, comprising:
`
`connecting to a server, the server receiving a global IP address of an IPv6-
`
`compatible terminal (connecting to P2P server, and providing pair of IP address and
`
`port number, see ¥ 0086);
`
`receiving the global IP address from the server; establishing P2P communication
`
`with the IPv6-compatible terminal (smart camera 110 communicate with P2P server,
`
`see { 0086, and IP packets may be IPv4 or IPv6 compatible, see § 0064); and
`
`transmitting image data captured by an image capturing section to the IPv6-
`
`compatible terminal by P2P communication (the smart camera 110 and terminal 120
`
`send data packets, see { 0086).
`
`Although ZONGdisclose performing hole punching by a server instead of the
`
`camera, ZONGfails to explicitly discloses that camera or terminal device performs hole
`
`punching.
`
`In the same field of endeavor, LU discloses when the mobile phone APP wants
`
`to access the NAS, firstly a hole punching processis tried to establish a P2P
`
`(Peer to Peer) connection with the NAS and perform data transmission. If the P2P
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/838,420
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 5
`
`connection is unsuccessfully established, data transmission between the mobile phone
`
`APP andthe NASis performed through a relay connection process (see { 0157).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art
`
`before the effectivefiling date of the claimed invention to implement LU's teaching in the
`
`camera device taught by ZONGin order to establish a TCP connection between two
`
`peers on the Internet behind NAT devices.
`
`Claims 3-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the
`
`combination of ZONG-LU as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of DAWESet
`
`al. (US 2015/0054947A1).
`
`Regarding claims 3 and 4, ZONGfails to disclose in a case wherethe IPv4-
`
`compatible terminal is located outside the wireless communication range of the router to
`
`which the camera is connected and a Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) function of the
`
`router is unusable, the controller establishes communication with the IPv4-compatible
`
`terminal via a relay server or wherein in a case where the IPv4-compatible terminalis
`
`capable of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) communication, the controller transmits the
`
`image data to the IPv4-compatible terminal based on UDP, and in a case where the
`
`IPv4-compatible terminal is incapable of UDP communication, the controller transmits
`
`the image data to the IPv4-compatible terminal based on a Transmission Control
`
`Protocol (TCP).
`
`In the same field of endeavor, DAWESdiscloses IP camera coupled or
`
`conntected to the system delivers seamless video streams to the user via
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/838,420
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 6
`
`communication paths using one or more of UPnP port forwarding relay server routing
`
`using TCP and User Datagram Protocol (UDP), see 4 0195, 0209, 0427).
`
`Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art
`
`before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate DAWES's
`
`teaching the device taught by the combination of ZONG-LU in order to provide security
`
`system or home monitoring application coupled or connect to monitoring and/or control
`
`applications residing outside of LAN in which the camera are situated.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any responseto this action should be mailed to:
`
`The following address mail to be delivered by the United States Postal
`Service (USPS)only:
`
`Mail Stop
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`or faxed to:
`
`(571) 273-8300, (for formal communications intendedfor entry)
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to Bob A. Phunkulh whose telephone number is (571)
`
`272-3083. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 8:00 A.M.
`
`to 5:00 P.M. (first week of the bi-week) and Monday-Friday (for second week ofthe bi-
`
`week).
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor CHARLESC. JIANG can be reach on (571) 270-7191.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 16/838,420
`Art Unit: 2412
`
`Page 7
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on accessto the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free).
`
`/BOB A PHUNKULH/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2412
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket