www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/116,137
`
`12/09/2020
`
`Jing Ya LI
`
`735256.453
`
`8085
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`TORRENTE, RICHARD T
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2485
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`05/26/2021
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Applicant(s)
`Application No.
`LI et al.
`17/116,137
`AIA (First Inventor
`Art
`Examiner
`Examiner-InitiatedInterview Summary
`to File) Status
`Unit
`RICHARD T
`
`TORRENTE 2485|Yes
`
`
`
`RICHARD T TORRENTE
`Shoko Leek
`
`Telephonic
`Attorney of Record PO
`
`Date of Interview: 13 May 2021
`
`Issues Discussed:
`
`Other
`
`The Examinerdiscussed Applicant claims and what the he sees can be amended to overcomepotential
`prior arts found. The Examiner proposedclarifying the claims to include certain limitations to overcome
`found prior arts to put the application in condition for allowance. Further discussions were pursued.
`Applicant called back 5/17/21 stating the Examiner’s proposed amendments was not persuasive and to
`move ahead with prosecution.
`
`/RICHARD T TORRENTE/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2485
`
`37 CFR§ 1.2 Businessto be transacted in writing
`
`Applicant is reminded that a complete written statement as to the substance of the interview must be made of record in
`the application file. It is the applicants responsibility to provide the written statement, unless the interview wasinitiated
`by the Examiner and the Examiner hasindicated that a written summarywill be provided. See MPEP 713.04
`Pleasefurther see:
`MPEP 713.04
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews, paragraph (b)
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: lt is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substanceof interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substanceof any interview of record. A complete
`and proper recordation of the substance of an interview should include the itemslisted in MPEP 713.04 for complete
`and proper recordation including the identification of the general thrust of each argumentor issue discussed, a general
`indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the general results or outcome of the
`interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issuesraised.
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413/41 3b (Rev. Oct. 2019)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20210521
`
`