`
`Introduction
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 1-26 were pending, of which claim 1 is independent.
`
`Claim lhas been amended and claim 26 has been added. No new matter has been added.
`
`Entry of various comments regarding the claims and/orthe art, in the Office Action,
`
`should not be construed as any acquiescence or agreement by Applicants with the stated
`
`reasoning, regardless of whether or not these remarks specifically address any particular
`
`commentfrom the Office Action.
`
`Reconsideration of this application for allowanceofall pending claims is hereby
`
`respectfully requested in view of the claim amendment and the following remarks.
`
`Patentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`Claims 1, 4, 7-10, 13-15, 17-22 and 24-25 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Ikeda (U.S. 2014/0183547) in view of Wilson (JP S62-259462), Israel (U.S.
`
`2016/0005680) and Sutardja (US 7,528,013). Claims 2-3 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
`
`being unpatentable over Ikeda in view of Wilson, Israel and Sutardja, and further in view of
`
`Harndenetal. (U.S. 2003/0062601). Claims 5-6 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Ikeda in view of Wilson, Israel and Sutardja and further in view of Chia (U.S.
`
`2007/0130759). Claims 11, 12, 16 and 23 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Ikeda in view of Wilson, Israel and Sutardja and further in view of Otremba
`
`(U.S. 2014/0097528). Without conceding any correctness of the rejections, Applicant traverses
`
`these rejections for at least the following reasons.
`
`At a minimum,noneof the cited references disclose or suggest that each drain terminals
`
`
`
`Application No.: 17/190,261
`
`amongthe plurality of drain terminals is connected to the drain pad by fourofthe plurality of
`
`second bonding wires (including gold), as recited by claim 1. Further, the alleged nitride
`
`semiconductor chip of Ikeda does not have a heterojunction interface including a two-
`
`dimensionalelectron gaslayer.
`
`Assuch, claim | and all claims dependent thereon are patentable overthe cited references.
`
`
`
`Application No.: 17/190,261
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Having fully respondedto all matters raised in the Office Action, Applicant submits that
`
`all claims are in condition for allowance, an indication for whichis respectfully solicited. If
`
`there are any outstanding issues that might be resolved by an interview or an Examiner’s
`
`amendment, the Examineris requested to call Applicant’s attorney at the telephone number
`
`shownbelow.
`
`To the extent necessary, a petition for an extension of time under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136 is
`
`hereby made. Please charge any shortage in fees due in connection with the filing of this paper,
`
`including extension of time fees, to Deposit Account 500417 and please credit any excess fees to
`
`such deposit account.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`
`/Takashi Saito/
`
`Takashi Saito
`Registration No. 69,536
`
`Please recognize our Customer No. 53080
`as our correspondenceaddress.
`
`500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001-1531
`Phone: 202.756.8244 TS:
`Facsimile: 202.756.8087
`Date: October 13, 2023
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
