throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/026,864
`
`09/21/2020
`
`Yuki Sugiura
`
`P200880US00
`
`5756
`
`WHDA, LLP
`8500 LEESBURG PIKE
`SUITE 7500
`TYSONS, VA 22182
`
`CLINTON, EVAN GARRETT
`
`2816
`
`09/20/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`Thetime period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`patentmail @ whda.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)C) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on 9/21/2020 is/are: a)(¥) accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`cc) None ofthe:
`b)LJ Some**
`a)Y) All
`1.¥) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 9/21/2020.
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) (J Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20230913
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/026 864
`Sugiura et al.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`Evan G Clinton
`2816
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 9/21/2020.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)() This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on__; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporatedinto this action.
`4)\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`)
`)
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-14 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Claim(s) 13-14 is/are allowed.
`s) 1,5-8 and 10-12 is/are rejected.
`Claim(s
`Claim(s) 2-4and9 is/are objected to.
`C Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/026,864
`Art Unit: 2816
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first
`
`inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102
`
`and 103 (or as subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory
`
`basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AlA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same
`
`under either status.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis
`
`for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale,
`or otherwise available to the public before the effectivefiling date of the claimed invention.
`
`Claims 1, 5-8, 10 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mazzillo
`
`et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2014/0339398)
`
`Regardingclaim 1, Mazzillo teaches a photodetector, comprising:
`
`a semiconductor substrate (Fig. 1, N substrate 2) of a first conductivity type (N type);
`
`a first semiconductor layer (Fig. 1, P layer 12) of a second conductivity type (P type) that is
`
`located above the semiconductor substrate (Fig. 1) and forms a junction with the semiconductor
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/026,864
`Art Unit: 2816
`
`Page 3
`
`substratein a first area (interface I), the second conductivity type being different from the first
`
`conductivity type (p vs n); and
`
`a second semiconductor layer (Fig. 1, guard rings 16) of the second conductivity (P type) type
`
`that is located above the semiconductor substrate (Fig. 1) in a second area outward of the first area (see
`
`Fig. 1), the second semiconductor layer having an impurity concentration lower than an impurity
`
`concentration of the first semiconductor layer (see Fig. 1, layer 12 is P+, layer 16 is P-), wherein the
`
`semiconductor substrate and the first semiconductor layer form a photoelectric converter including a
`
`charge multiplication region in which charges are multiplied by avalanche multiplication (see Title), and
`
`the second semiconductor layer extends to a level below an interface between the
`
`semiconductor substrate and the first semiconductor layer in a thickness direction of the semiconductor
`
`substrate (see Fig. 1).
`
`Regarding claim 5, Mazzillo teaches the photodetector according to claim 1, wherein the
`
`semiconductor substrate includes:
`
`a third portion (Fig. 1, layer 8); and
`
`a fourth portion (Fig. 1, layer 14) that is located on the third portion and in contact with the first
`
`semiconductor layer(Fig. 1), and
`
`an impurity concentration of the fourth portion is higher than an impurity concentration of the
`
`third portion (layer 14 is N, layer 8 is N-).
`
`Regarding claim 6, Mazzillo teaches the photodetector according to claim 1, wherein the
`
`semiconductor substrate includes: a third portion (layer 4); and a fourth portion (layer 8) that is located
`
`outward of the second semiconductor layer on the third portion in a plan view (see Fig. 1, layer 8
`
`extends further outward than layer 16).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/026,864
`Art Unit: 2816
`
`Page 4
`
`Regarding claim 7, Mazzillo teaches the photodetector according to claim 6, wherein the
`
`semiconductor substrate further includesa fifth portion (layer 28) that is located outward of the fourth
`
`portion (Fig. 1; “portion” is undefined in the claim, and therefore the fourth “portion” can be considered
`
`the portion of layer 8 between layer 16 and layer 28) on the third portion in a plan view (Fig. 1, layer 28
`
`is formed on layer 4 and is outward of fourth “portion”), and
`
`an impurity concentration of the fifth portion (paragraph [0058], layer 28 concentration of 5e20)
`
`is higher than an impurity concentration of the fourth portion (paragraph [0045], layer 8 concentration
`
`of 5e15; i.e. the fifth portion concentration is higher than the fourth).
`
`Regarding claim 8, Mazzillo teaches the photodetector according to claim 1, wherein the first
`
`semiconductor layer is separated into an outer portion located in the second area and an inner portion
`
`located in the first area (see Fig. 1, outer portion is where overlap occurs between layers 12 and 16,
`
`inner portion is where overlap does not occur) and
`
`an isolation region ofthe first conductivity type for electrically isolating the outer portion and
`
`the inner portion is not provided between the outer portion and the inner portion (see Fig. 1, no
`
`electrical isolation region is provided).
`
`Regardingclaim 10, Mazzillo teaches the photodetector according to claim 1, further
`
`comprising:
`
`a shallow trenchisolation (STI) (Fig. 1, ST| 24) that covers a portion outward ofthefirst
`
`semiconductor Layer in a top surface of the semiconductor substrate(Fig. 1).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/026,864
`Art Unit: 2816
`
`Page 5
`
`Regarding claim 12, Mazzillo teaches the photodetector according to claim 1. wherein the
`
`photoelectric converter comprises a plurality of photoelectric converters arranged in an array (see Fig.
`
`2).
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102
`
`and 103 (or as subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory
`
`basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AlA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same
`
`under either status.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections
`
`set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is
`not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102,if the differences between the claimed invention
`and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the
`effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the
`claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention
`was made.
`
`Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mazzillo in view of Yuang
`
`et al. (U.S. Publication no. 2006/0125035).
`
`Regardingclaim 11, Mazzillo teaches the photodetector according to claim 10, but does not
`
`teach wherein in a plan view, the STI is a rectangular ring.
`
`Mazzillo does not specifically teach the shape of the STI. However, Yuang teachesthat an STI
`
`used surrounding a photodiode is a rectangular ring (paragraph [0014]). It would have been obvious to a
`
`person ofskill in the art at the time of the effective filing date that the STI of Mazzillo could have been a
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/026,864
`Art Unit: 2816
`
`Page 6
`
`rectangular shape because Yuang teachesthatthis is “typical”
`
`|’
`
`of an STI, and it would have been a simple
`
`substitution of the unknownshape of Mazzillo for the known shape of Yuang with predictable results.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`Claims 2-4, and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be
`
`allowable if rewritten in independent form includingall of the limitations of the base claim and any
`
`intervening claims.
`
`The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter:
`
`Regarding claims 2-4, the prior art, alone or in combination,fails to teach or suggest an isolation
`
`region ofthe first conductivity type that is located between the well and the first semiconductor layer.
`
`Regarding claim 9, the prior art, alone or in combination,fails to teach or suggest wherein the
`
`outer portion and the inner portion are electrically connected by a wire.
`
`Claims 13-14 are allowed.
`
`The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance:
`
`Regarding claims 13-14, the prior art, alone or in combination,fails to teach or suggest a
`
`photoelectric converter that is located in a third area inward of the first area; and an isolation region of
`
`the first conductivity type that is located between the first area and the third area.
`
`Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment
`
`of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompanythe issue fee. Such
`
`submissions should beclearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.”
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/026,864
`Art Unit: 2816
`
`Page 7
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to Evan G Clinton whose telephone number is (571)270-0525. The examiner can
`
`normally be reached Monday-Friday at 8:30am to 5:30pm.
`
`Examiner interviewsare available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a
`
`USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use
`
`the USPTO Automated Interview Request(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor,
`
`Zandra Smith can be reached on (571) 272-2429. The fax phone number for the organization where this
`
`application or proceedingis assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from
`
`Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To
`
`file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For additional
`
`questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free). If you would like
`
`assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or
`
`571-272-1000.
`
`/EVAN G CLINTON/
`Examiner, Art Unit 2816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket