`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/316,182
`
`05/10/2021
`
`Makiko TANAKA
`
`070469-1075
`
`5533
`
`McDermott Will and Emery LLP
`The McDermott Building
`500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`PILLAY, DEVINA
`
`1726
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`06/07/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`Thetime period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`mweipdocket@mwe.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-3,6-8 and 13-21 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Cj} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-3,6-8 and 13-21 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)___is/are objected to.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)0) The drawing(s) filedon__ is/are: a)(J accepted or b)( objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)1) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)Z None ofthe:
`b)() Some**
`a)C All
`1... Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1) Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No.
`3.1.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) (J Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20230313
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/316,182
`TANAKA etal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`DEVINA PILLAY
`1726
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 02/21/2023.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)() This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`underthe first inventorto file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
`
`A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), wasfiled in this application after final rejection. Since this
`
`application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has beentimely paid, the finality of the previous Office action
`
`has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on
`
`02/21/2023 has been entered.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not includedin this action can
`
`be found in a prior Office action.
`
`Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 7, 13, 14, and 19-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as
`
`being unpatentable over Smythe (US 2011/0030754 A1) in view of Moczygemba
`
`(US 2017/0027053 A1) in view of Otey (US 2012/0060889 A1).
`
`Regarding claims 1, 6, 13 and 14, Smythe discloses a thermoelectric conversion
`
`module, comprising (See Figs. 1-10):
`
`a first thermoelectric conversion element group (230a) that includes at least one
`
`first thermoelectric member (210) and at least one second thermoelectric member (210)
`
`(see Fig. 5, [0042][0043]) the at least one first thermoelectric member including a first
`
`conductivity-type semiconductor (see side view Fig. 2, each group consists pf multiple p
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 3
`
`and n-type elements, analogous to 100, first-type is n-type/p-type), the at least one
`
`second thermoelectric member including a second conductivity-type semiconductor (p-
`
`type/n-type, 100, see Fig. 2);
`
`a second thermoelectric conversion element group (230b [0042]-[0043]) that
`
`includes at least one third thermoelectric member (110) and at least one fourth
`
`thermoelectric member (110), the at least one third thermoelectric member including the
`
`first conductivity-type semiconductor(n-type/p-type), the at least one fourth
`
`thermoelectric member including the second conductivity-type semiconductor (p-type/n-
`
`type);
`
`a first substrate (202 see Fig. 8 [0040] [0044]) connected to an upperside of the
`
`first thermoelectric conversion element group and the second thermoelectric conversion
`
`element group; and a second substrate (204 see Fig. 8 [(0040][0044]) connected to a
`
`lower side of the first thermoelectric conversion element group and the second
`
`thermoelectric conversion element group,
`
`wherein the at least one first thermoelectric member and the at least one second
`
`thermoelectric member are electrically connected to each other byafirst current path,
`
`the at least one third thermoelectric member and the at least one fourth thermoelectric
`
`member are electrically connected to each other by a second current path,
`
`and the first current path is insulated from the second current path (each of 230
`
`form their own current paths [0044]) .
`
`However, Smythe doesnot disclose:
`
`e
`
`a first region wherethe first thermoelectric conversion element group is disposed
`
`is acold stimulation region for a stimulation site, a second region where the
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 4
`
`second thermoelectric conversion element group is disposed is a hot stimulating
`
`region for a stimulation site and in plan viewafirst size area of the first region is
`
`smaller than a second area size of a second region (claim 1)
`
`
`
`e inaplan viewafirst area size of the first region is smaller than a second area of
`
`the second region (claim 1)
`
`e
`
`atleast a portion of a surrounding region of the first region and at least a portion
`
`of a surrounding region of the second region are along a side ofthe first
`
`substrate or a side of the second substrate (claim 1)
`
`e wherein a portion exceptfor the portion that is along the side ofthe first substrate
`
`or the side of the second substrate in the surrounding region of the first region is
`
`surrounded by the second region (claim 1)
`
`e
`
`the second area is at least 1.5 times and at most 5 times the first area size (claim
`
`6)
`
`Smythe discloses that the power can be adjusted dynamically to different regions
`
`(230) and can havedifferent DC power sources ([0038][0039)]).
`
`Moczygembadiscloses a substrate with thermoelectric modules in different
`
`zones (410-450, see Fig. 4 [0039]-[0045]) wherein the zones can havedifferent shapes
`
`and sizes, including random, circular or orthogonal ([0035]), and wherein the different
`
`zones can be heated and cooled simultaneously ([0043]) for therapy reasons.
`
`Furthermore, Moczygemba disclosesa first zone (region, 420) surroundedpartially by a
`
`second zone (region, 410, 430, 440, 450) which providesa different rate of cooling and
`
`the two zones share a portion of the same side and the second zone surrounds the
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 5
`
`remaining portions of the first zone ([0043]). Note thatfirst zone cools to a lower
`
`temperature than the second zone ([0043], claim 13).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time offiling to
`
`modify the regions of Smythe so that the shape and sizeofthefirst, second, and
`
`surrounding regions are the same asinstantly claimed and furthermore so that the first
`
`region provides cooling and second region provides heating as disclosed by
`
`Moczygemba because doing so will allow for a user to receive therapeutic relief and
`
`furthermore because Moczygembadiscloses the zones (regions) can havedifferent
`
`shapes and the types of substrates used can be altered ([0033)).
`
`In addition, Smythe discloses (see Fig. 5) wherein the first substrate (202) or
`
`the second substrate (204) is provided withafirst positive electrode pad (one of 234a)
`
`that is electrically connected to the at least one first thermoelectric member,a first
`
`negative electrode pad (the other one of 234a) that is electrically connectedto the at
`
`least one second thermoelectric member, a second negative electrode pad (one of
`
`234b) that is electrically connected to the at least one third thermoelectric member, and
`
`a second positive electrode pad (other one of 234b) that is electrically connected to the
`
`at least one fourth thermoelectric member.
`
`In addition, Smythe wherein the first positive electrode pad, the first negative
`
`electrode pad, the second negative electrode pad, and the second positive electrode
`
`pad are disposed alongaside ofthe first substrate or a side of the second substrate
`
`(see Fig. 5 [0043)).
`
`Smythe doesnot disclose that the other edges do not have contact padsfor
`
`other external circuits.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 6
`
`Otey disclosesthat circuit patterns which allow for external device connection
`
`(See contact pads at edges) can be arranged to be along a single side or multiple
`
`edges (see Fig. 6D and GE versus 6F) and arranging along a single edge allowsfor the
`
`use of smaller substrates.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time offiling to
`
`modify the positioning of the electrode pads of modified Smythe so that they are only
`
`along a single edge because as disclosed by Otey it would allow for the use of smaller
`
`substrates.
`
`Note that the shapesofthe first region (230a) and second region (230b) of
`
`Smythe have been altered as set forth above by Moczygemba.
`
`Regarding claims 2 and 3, modified Smythe disclosesall of the claim limitations
`
`as set forth above.
`
`In addition, Smythe discloses (See Fig. 8) a first element connecting pad (any
`
`electrically interconnecting contacting pad that attaches to a thermoelectric element
`
`disposed in group 230a) disposed on a surface ofthe first substrate;
`
`and a second element (any other electrically interconnecting contacting pad that
`
`attaches to a thermoelectric element disposed in group 230a) connecting pad disposed
`
`on a surface of the second substrate,
`
`wherein the second element connecting pad is connected (physically connected
`
`through substrate to all thermoelectric elements) to the at least one first thermoelectric
`
`member (a thermoelectric element disposed in group 230a), the at least one second
`
`thermoelectric member (a thermoelectric element disposed in group 230a), the at least
`
`one third thermoelectric member (a thermoelectric element disposed in group 230b),
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 7
`
`and the at least one fourth thermoelectric member (a thermoelectric element disposed
`
`in group 230b) and all thermoelectric elements share two common substrates(first and
`
`second substrate).
`
`Regarding claim 7, modified Smythe disclosesall of the claim limitations as set
`
`forth above.
`
`With regards to “wherein the first thermoelectric conversion element group is
`
`used for heat absorption and the second thermoelectric conversion element group is
`
`usedfor heat dissipation” this is considered an intended use limitation, if a prior art
`
`structure is capable of performing the intended use asrecited in the preamble, then it
`
`meets the claim. See, e.g., In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1429,
`
`1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997) and casescited therein, as it has been held that the recitation of a
`
`new intended use for an old product does not make a claim to that old product
`
`patentable.
`
`In re Schreiber, 44 USPQ2d 1429 (Fed. Cir. 1997). See also MPEP §
`
`2111.02, §2112.02 and 2114-2115.
`
`Regarding claim 19, modified Smythe disclosesall of the claim limitations as set
`
`forth above.
`
`In addition, Smythe discloses that the substrates can accommodate sensors
`
`([(0046]) and that optimal temperature control can be provided as noted abovein the
`
`rejection of Claim 4.
`
`As noted above Moczygembadiscloses different zones can be heated and
`
`cooled simultaneously ([0043]) for therapy reasons.
`
`In addition, Moczygembadiscloses that temperature sensors (477) can allow set
`
`points for temperature control, so that the thermoelectric modules can be turned on and
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 8
`
`off ([0041]), and the sensor can be provided in different zones which can provide
`
`different temperatures ([0043)).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time offiling to
`
`add in temperature sensors as disclosed by Smythe and Moczygembain the system of
`
`Smythe so that different zones can provide different temperatures as disclosed by
`
`Moczygemba because it will allow for therapeutic relief.
`
`Regarding claims 20 and 21, modifiedSmythe disclosesall of the claim
`
`limitations as set forth above.
`
`In addition, Smythe discloses an extended portion (outer periphery where 108 is
`
`placed, see Fig. 1) that extends out from an end of at least one of the first substrate or
`
`the second substrate, wherein the first substrate and the second substrate arefilm-like
`
`substrates (laminates, Abstract) and
`
`wherein the extendedportion includes a third region (region which does not
`
`include traces 116) and a fourth region (region which includes traces 116), andafirst
`
`width of the third region is wider than a second width of the fourth region, the third
`
`region being closer (a portion of the third region is closer to the first substrate) to the
`
`first substrate, the fourth region being farther from the first substrate or the second
`
`substrate than the third region (a portion of the fourth region is further to the first
`
`substrate), the first width and the second width each being a width in a direction
`
`perpendicular to a longitudinal direction (no direction defined with respect to any fixed
`
`object therefore can be any direction) of the extended portion.
`
`Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`Smythe (US 2011/0030754 A1) in view of Moczygemba (US 2017/0027053 A1) in
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 9
`
`view of Otey (US 2012/0060889 A1) as applied to claims 1-3, 6, 7, 13, 14, and 19-21
`
`above andin further view of Kossakovski (US 10,727,390 B2) in view of Ouyang
`
`(US 7,436,059 B1).
`
`Regarding claim 8, modified Smythe disclosesall of the claim limitations as set
`
`forth above.
`
`However, Smythe doesnot disclose a metal layer is continuously provided on a
`
`bottom surface of the second substrate across a boundary between a region opposite
`
`the first region and a region opposite the second region.
`
`Kossakovski discloses an additional metal layer (54) can be provided on a
`
`dielectric substrate (52) to increase heat transfer (C4/L60-67).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention to modify the second substrate of modified Smythe by adding a metallic foil to
`
`the bottom surface as disclosed by Kossakovski to increase the amount of heat transfer
`
`to/from the substrate.
`
`In addition, Smythe discloses that the substrates can accommodate sensors
`
`([0046)).
`
`As noted above Moczygembadiscloses different zones can be heated and
`
`cooled simultaneously ([0043]) for therapy reasons.
`
`In addition, Moczygembadiscloses that temperature sensors (477) can allow set
`
`points for temperature control, so that the thermoelectric modules can be turned on and
`
`off ([0041]), and the sensor can be provided in different zones which can provide
`
`different temperatures ([0043]).
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 10
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time offiling to
`
`add in temperature sensors as disclosed by Smythe and Moczygembain the system of
`
`Smythe so that different zones can provide different temperatures as disclosed by
`
`Moczygemba because it will allow for therapeutic relief.
`
`Ouyang discloses that thermal sensors can havedifferent shapes and completely
`
`cover the region that thermoelectric modules are placed in that control cooling/heating
`
`(C7/L16-L50).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time offiling to
`
`modify the shape and positioning of the first and second thermal sensors of Smythe so
`
`that the first and second cover the first and second regions because as disclosed by
`
`Ouyang the thermal sensors coupled to the thermoelectric modules can have such a
`
`configuration and doing so will enable or more accurate temperature measurement of
`
`the region which is temperature controlled.
`
`In addition, Smythe discloses that the substrates can accommodate sensors
`
`([(0046]) and connectors for sensors.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time offiling to
`
`modify the wiring for the sensors so that they are routed through the substrates as
`
`disclosed by Smythe so thata first wiring pad and a second wiring pad whichelectrically
`
`connectto either of the sensors is provided between the thermoelectric groups at the
`
`shared edge of the groups.
`
`Claim(s) 15-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over Smythe (US 2011/0030754 A1) in view of Moczygemba (US 2017/0027053 A1)
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 11
`
`in view of Otey (US 2012/0060889 A1) as applied to claims 1-3, 6, 7, 13, 14, and 19-
`
`21 above andin further view of Chu (US 6,804,966 B1).
`
`Regarding claims 15-18, modified Smythe discloses all of the claim limitations as
`
`set forth above.
`
`However, Smythe doesnot disclose that the thermoelectric element groups can
`
`have different thermoelectric densities such that the following conditions are achieved:
`
`wherein a closest distance between the first thermoelectric conversion element
`
`group and the second thermoelectric conversion element group is greater than a
`
`distance between the at least one first thermoelectric member and the at least
`
`one second thermoelectric member
`
`wherein a distance between the first thermoelectric conversion element group
`
`and the second thermoelectric conversion element group is less than a distance
`
`between the at least one third thermoelectric member and the at least one fourth
`
`thermoelectric member
`
`wherein the distance between the first thermoelectric conversion element group
`
`and the second thermoelectric conversion element group is at least 0.1 mm and
`
`at most 2.0 mm
`
`wherein a sum of a total number of the at least one third thermoelectric member
`
`and a total number of the at least one fourth thermoelectric member is greater
`
`than or equal to asum of a total number of the at least one first thermoelectric
`
`member and a total number of the at least one second thermoelectric member.
`
`Chu disclosesthat different thermoelectric groups can be provide different rates
`
`of cooling and this can be controlled by providing different densities of thermoelectric
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 12
`
`elements (C6/L17-39) and also spacing between different regions (100A, 100B, and
`
`110) (C6/40-51).
`
`It is noted that the amount heating is also affected by the density of
`
`thermoelectric elements since the opposing side to cooling of Chu will be heated.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time offiling to
`
`modify the densities of the thermoelectric elements which are contained in the
`
`respective groupings and spacing between to groupings to achieve the above claimed
`
`limitations in modified Smythe because Chu discloses doing so would allow for optimal
`
`cooling/heating to be delivered to necessary areas.
`
`In addition, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the at the time
`
`offiling to modify the spacing between the thermoelectric groups of modified Smythe
`
`such that the spacing is greater than the packing the one first thermoelectric member
`
`and the at least one second thermoelectric member because it will allow for optimal
`
`cooling of the necessary components of the device dependent on geometry.
`
`Notwithstanding, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to the recited
`
`dimensions through routine experimentation and optimization. Applicant has not
`
`disclosed that the dimensions are for a particular unobvious purpose, produce an
`
`unexpected result, or are otherwise critical, and it appears prima facie that the process
`
`would possessutility using another dimension. Indeed, it has been held that mere
`
`dimensionallimitations are prima facie obvious absent a disclosure that the limitations
`
`are for a particular unobvious purpose, produce an unexpectedresult, or are otherwise
`
`critical. See, for example, /n re Rose, 220 F.2d 459, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955); In re
`
`Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 189 USPQ 143 (CCPA 1976); Gardner v. TEC Systems,Inc.,
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 13
`
`725 F.2d 1338, 220 USPQ 777 (Fed. Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 830, 225 USPQ
`
`232 (1984); In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966).
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`Applicant argues that the wiring of the device being located on the same size
`
`allows for a compact size and therefore allows for reduction of size of a haptic device
`
`and the prior art does not discloses the specific configuration of the first and second
`
`region.
`
`Examiner notes that the prior art of Moczygembadiscloses that output wiring can
`
`be located on the sameside of wearable devices (See Fig. 4). Output contact pads on
`
`one side versus on several sides would allow for reduction of substrate size, see Otey
`
`(US 2012/0060889 A1 acomparison of circuit patterns shownin Fig. 6D versus 6E).
`
`The prior art of Moczygemba gives motivation for providing the specific
`
`configuration of the first region, since the prior art discloses that the region shapes can
`
`be changed for therapeutic reasons.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to DEVINA PILLAY whose telephone numberis (571)270-
`
`1180. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30-6:00.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-basedcollaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/316,182
`Art Unit: 1726
`
`Page 14
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Jeffrey T Barton can be reached on 517-272-1307. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Centeris
`
`available to registered users. Tofile and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,
`
`visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-
`
`center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For
`
`additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197
`
`(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`DEVINA PILLAY
`Primary Examiner
`Art Unit 1726
`
`/DEVINA PILLAY/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1726
`
`